![GST Refund Claims using Bogus / Fake Firms: Haryana issues Instructions [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/GST-Refund-Claims-ITC-Input-Tax-Credit-Fake-ITC-Case-Bogus-Firms-Taxscan.jpeg "GST Refund Claims using Bogus / Fake Firms: Haryana issues Instructions [Read Circular]")
GST Refund Claims using Bogus / Fake Firms: Haryana issues Instructions [Read Circular]
In order to curb GST evasion using bogus firms, the Haryana State departments issued strict instructions to the officers. A recent circular issued...
![GST Fraud: Patiala House Court refuses Bail to Chartered Accountant allegedly involved in Preparing Forged Certificates [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/GST-Fraud-Patiala-House-Court-Bail-Chartered-Accountant-Forged-Certificates-taxscan.jpg "GST Fraud: Patiala House Court refuses Bail to Chartered Accountant allegedly involved in Preparing Forged Certificates [Read Order]")
![Gurugram GST refund Fraud Case: Court rejects Bail Application of 2 Chartered Accountants [Read Petition]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Gurugram-GST-refund-Fraud-Case-Court-Bail-Application-Chartered-Accountants-Taxscan.jpeg "Gurugram GST refund Fraud Case: Court rejects Bail Application of 2 Chartered Accountants [Read Petition]")
![Rejection of GST Refund without Speaking Order: Calcutta HC directs Dept to re-consider Claim in 8 Weeks [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Rejection-of-GST-Refund-Calcutta-High-Court-GST-Refund-GST.jpeg "Rejection of GST Refund without Speaking Order: Calcutta HC directs Dept to re-consider Claim in 8 Weeks [Read Order]")
GST: Interest on Delayed Refund of IGST covered u/s 50 cannot Exceed 6%, rules Supreme Court [Read Order]
The Supreme Court has observed that in case of delay in granting Integrated GST refund cannot exceed 6% as per the principal provisions of section 50 of the Central GST Act, 2017, especially when the...
![GST: Interest on Delayed Refund of IGST covered u/s 50 cannot Exceed 6%, rules Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Interest-Refund-IGSt-Supreme-Court-taxscan.jpg "GST: Interest on Delayed Refund of IGST covered u/s 50 cannot Exceed 6%, rules Supreme Court [Read Order]")
![GST Refund: Uttar Pradesh Govt issues Clarification [Read Circular]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/GST-Refund-Uttar-Pradesh-Govt-taxscan.jpg "GST Refund: Uttar Pradesh Govt issues Clarification [Read Circular]")
Taxpayer should get Reasonable Time to file Reply: Delhi HC quashes Order Rejecting GST Refund [Read Order]
In Richie Rich Exim Solutions vs Commissioner of CGST, the Delhi High Court quashed the rejection order or refund of RS. 98,54,248/- claimed by the petitioner under the ground in violation of GST...
![Taxpayer should get Reasonable Time to file Reply: Delhi HC quashes Order Rejecting GST Refund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Taxpayer-Reasonable-Time-Delhi-HC-Order-GST-Refund-taxascan.jpg "Taxpayer should get Reasonable Time to file Reply: Delhi HC quashes Order Rejecting GST Refund [Read Order]")
![GST Refund cannot be rejected merely on Ground of Delay: Allahabad High Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/GST-Refund-cannot-rejected-merely-Ground-Delay-Allahabad-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "GST Refund cannot be rejected merely on Ground of Delay: Allahabad High Court [Read Order]")
![Relief to Swiggy: Karnataka High Court orders GST Refund of Rs. 27 Cr Illegally collected [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Swiggy-Karnataka-High-Court-orders-GST-Refund-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief to Swiggy: Karnataka High Court orders GST Refund of Rs. 27 Cr Illegally collected [Read Order]")
Bombay HC quashes Order rejecting GST Refund Application, directs Commissioner to pass order after granting opportunity of being heard [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has quashed the Order rejecting GST Refund Application, and directed the Commissioner to pass order after granting the opportunity of being heard. The Petitioner, M/s. Globus...
![Bombay HC quashes Order rejecting GST Refund Application, directs Commissioner to pass order after granting opportunity of being heard [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Bombay-High-Court-quashes-Order-GST-Refund-Application-GST-refund-Commissioner-pass-order-Taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC quashes Order rejecting GST Refund Application, directs Commissioner to pass order after granting opportunity of being heard [Read Order]")
Adjudicating Authority committed error by not sanctioning GST Refund as 10% Deposit required for Filing Second Appeal inclusive of 7.5% pre-deposit made for First Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that Adjudicating Authority committed error by not sanctioning GST refund claim of pre-deposit, penalty...
![Adjudicating Authority committed error by not sanctioning GST Refund as 10% Deposit required for Filing Second Appeal inclusive of 7.5% pre-deposit made for First Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Adjudicating-Authority-GST-deposits-pre-deposit-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Adjudicating Authority committed error by not sanctioning GST Refund as 10% Deposit required for Filing Second Appeal inclusive of 7.5% pre-deposit made for First Appeal: CESTAT [Read Order]")