![Imposition of Penalty under GST Act: Madras HC extends Time Limit fixed for filing Appeal with required Pre-Deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/GST-penalty-appeal-GST-Time-limit-for-GST-penalty-appeal-Madras-High-Court-Imposition-of-gst-penalty-Extension-of-appeal-taxscan.jpg "Imposition of Penalty under GST Act: Madras HC extends Time Limit fixed for filing Appeal with required Pre-Deposit [Read Order]")
Imposition of Penalty under GST Act: Madras HC extends Time Limit fixed for filing Appeal with required Pre-Deposit [Read Order]
The Madras High Court extended the time limit fixed for filing appeal with required pre-deposit, in the matter of imposition of penalty under the...
![Service Tax Demand Under ‘Manpower supply Service’ by Invoking Extended Period: CESTAT Quashes Demand on ground of Limitation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/Service-Tax-Demand-Manpower-supply-Service-Extended-Period-CESTAT-Demand-Limitation-taxscan.jpg "Service Tax Demand Under ‘Manpower supply Service’ by Invoking Extended Period: CESTAT Quashes Demand on ground of Limitation [Read Order]")
![Relief to DLF Home Developers, Mere Registration, non payment of Service Tax cannot be a reason to allege Suppression: CESTAT sets aside Penalty on Preferential Location Services [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/DLF-Home-Developers-of-Service-Tax-CESTAT-Preferential-Location-Services-taxscan.jpg "Relief to DLF Home Developers, Mere Registration, non payment of Service Tax cannot be a reason to allege Suppression: CESTAT sets aside Penalty on Preferential Location Services [Read Order]")
![Payment of Premium or Salami for Transfer of Interest in Property are Exempted from Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/payment-of-premium-interest-in-property-exempted-from-service-tax-cestat-taxscan.jpg "Payment of Premium or Salami for Transfer of Interest in Property are Exempted from Service Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![CENVAT Credit of Excise Duty allowable even if Final Products are Destroyed during Course of Testing: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/CENVAT-Excise-Duty-Final-Products-are-Destroyed-Course-of-Testing-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "CENVAT Credit of Excise Duty allowable even if Final Products are Destroyed during Course of Testing: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Relief to Hindustan Unilever : CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/r 26 (2) of Central Excise Rules on Issuance of Supplementary Invoices on ground of Non-involvement of Sale [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) granted relief to Hindustan Unilever by quashing the penalty imposed under rule 26(2) of the Central Excise...
![Relief to Hindustan Unilever : CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/r 26 (2) of Central Excise Rules on Issuance of Supplementary Invoices on ground of Non-involvement of Sale [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Hindustan-Unilever-CESTAT-Quashes-Penalty-Central-Excise-Rules-Supplementary-Invoices-Non-involvement-of-Sale-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Hindustan Unilever : CESTAT Quashes Penalty u/r 26 (2) of Central Excise Rules on Issuance of Supplementary Invoices on ground of Non-involvement of Sale [Read Order]")
CESTAT upholds Imposition of penalty for failure in not being proactive for fulfilling regulation 10(d) of CBLR [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) imposed penalty for the failure of not being proactive for fulfilling regulation 10(d) of Customs Brokers Licensing...
![CESTAT upholds Imposition of penalty for failure in not being proactive for fulfilling regulation 10(d) of CBLR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/CESTAT-upholds-Imposition-penalty-fulfilling-regulation-CBLR-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds Imposition of penalty for failure in not being proactive for fulfilling regulation 10(d) of CBLR [Read Order]")
Calcutta HC Quashes Imposition of Penalty at Rate of 200% as E-Way Bill Satisfied Conditions u/s 129 of CGST and WBGST Act [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court quashed the imposition of penalty at rate of 200% as E-Way Bill satisfied conditions under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Service Tax, 2017 (CGST) and West Bengal Goods...
![Calcutta HC Quashes Imposition of Penalty at Rate of 200% as E-Way Bill Satisfied Conditions u/s 129 of CGST and WBGST Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Calcutta-High-Court-Calcutta-HC-Quashes-Imposition-of-Penalty-Imposition-of-Penalty-Penalty-E-Way-Bill-Satisfied-Conditions-E-Way-Bill-CGST-WBGST-Act-taxscan.jpg "Calcutta HC Quashes Imposition of Penalty at Rate of 200% as E-Way Bill Satisfied Conditions u/s 129 of CGST and WBGST Act [Read Order]")
ITAT Upholds Imposition of Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act due to Non Audit of Books of Account [Read Order]
The Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT) upheld the imposition of penalty by the assessing officer under section 271B of the Income Tax Act,1961 due to non-audit of books of...
![ITAT Upholds Imposition of Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act due to Non Audit of Books of Account [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/ITAT-Upholds-Imposition-of-Penalty-ITAT-Imposition-of-Penalty-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Non-Audit-of-Books-of-Account-Books-of-Account-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT Upholds Imposition of Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act due to Non Audit of Books of Account [Read Order]")
Dealer doesn’t disputed Tax Demand: Madras High Court quashes order confirming Imposition of Penalty at 1.5 Times of Tax Demand [Read Order]
The Madras High Court quashed the order confirming the imposition of penalty at 1.5 times of the tax demand. The respondent, Harish Agencies is a dealer in petrol and high-speed diesel in...
![Dealer doesn’t disputed Tax Demand: Madras High Court quashes order confirming Imposition of Penalty at 1.5 Times of Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Madras-HC-imposition-of-penalty-tax-demand-Taxscan.jpg "Dealer doesn’t disputed Tax Demand: Madras High Court quashes order confirming Imposition of Penalty at 1.5 Times of Tax Demand [Read Order]")