![S. 50C of Income Tax Act Not Applicable on Compulsory Acquisition of Land: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/S.-50C-of-Income-Tax-Act-Compulsory-Acquisition-of-Land-Calcutta-HC-Taxscan.jpg "S. 50C of Income Tax Act Not Applicable on Compulsory Acquisition of Land: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
S. 50C of Income Tax Act Not Applicable on Compulsory Acquisition of Land: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a significant case Calcutta high court held that section 50C of Income Tax Act 1961 was not applicable on compulsory acquisition of land. ...
![Books of Accounts Need not be Maintained If Income is Offered on Presumptive Basis u/s 44AD of IT Act: ITAT deletes Addition against Vegetable Vendor [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Books-of-Accounts-Income-Presumptive-us-44AD-of-IT-Act-ITAT-Addition-Vegetable-Vendor-Taxscan.jpg "Books of Accounts Need not be Maintained If Income is Offered on Presumptive Basis u/s 44AD of IT Act: ITAT deletes Addition against Vegetable Vendor [Read Order]")
![CESTAT quashes Service Tax liability on Miscellaneous Income treated as Receipts towards Construction Services [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/CESTAT-Customs-excise-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-liability-liability-Miscellaneous-Income-Income-Receipts-Construction-Services-Services-Taxscan.jpg "CESTAT quashes Service Tax liability on Miscellaneous Income treated as Receipts towards Construction Services [Read Order]")
![Delhi HC remands Income Tax Demand of Rs. 1,140 Cr against OYO for fresh Hearing to CIT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/INCOME-TAX-DEMAND.jpg "Delhi HC remands Income Tax Demand of Rs. 1,140 Cr against OYO for fresh Hearing to CIT [Read Order]")
![Mere Change of Opinion does not provide Jurisdiction to Re-Open Assessment: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Mere-Change-of-Opinion-Jurisdiction-Re-Open-Assessment-Bombay-HC-Taxscan.jpg "Mere Change of Opinion does not provide Jurisdiction to Re-Open Assessment: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Eligibility u/s 80P in respect of Buildings/Godowns Used by Co-operative Society: ITAT directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]
The Indore bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently directed the assessing officer to re-adjudicate assessee’s eligibility under section 80P of income tax act 1961 in respect of...
![Eligibility u/s 80P in respect of Buildings/Godowns Used by Co-operative Society: ITAT directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Eligibility-us-80P-Buildings-Godowns-Co-operative-Society-ITAT-Re-Adjudication-Taxscan.jpg "Eligibility u/s 80P in respect of Buildings/Godowns Used by Co-operative Society: ITAT directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]")
Non-Response to Notice due to Negligence of Chartered Accountant/ Income Tax Practitioner: Madras HC directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]
The Madras High court has recently directed to the Income tax authority for Re-adjudicate the assessee's matter when it was caused by the negligence of Income tax Practitioner. V.Srikanth, counsel...
![Non-Response to Notice due to Negligence of Chartered Accountant/ Income Tax Practitioner: Madras HC directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Non-Response-to-Notice-Negligence-of-Chartered-Accountant-Income-Tax-Practitioner-Madras-HC-Re-Adjudication-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Response to Notice due to Negligence of Chartered Accountant/ Income Tax Practitioner: Madras HC directs Re-Adjudication [Read Order]")
Purchase of Property within Specified Period of One year before Sale of Capital Asset Allowable as Capital Gain exemption u/s 54F: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently held purchase of property within specified period of one year before sale of capital asset allowable as capital gain exemption...
![Purchase of Property within Specified Period of One year before Sale of Capital Asset Allowable as Capital Gain exemption u/s 54F: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Purchase-of-Property-Specified-Period-of-One-year-before-Sale-of-Capital-Asset-Capital-Gain-exemption-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Purchase of Property within Specified Period of One year before Sale of Capital Asset Allowable as Capital Gain exemption u/s 54F: ITAT [Read Order]")
Advance given to Protect Business Interest of Assessee-Company does not Attract Provisions of Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of Income Tax Appellate Authority (ITAT) recently held that advance given to protect business interest of assessee –company did not attract provisions of deemed dividend under section...
![Advance given to Protect Business Interest of Assessee-Company does not Attract Provisions of Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Advance-Protect-Business-Interest-of-Assessee-Company-Attract-Provisions-of-Deemed-Dividend-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Advance given to Protect Business Interest of Assessee-Company does not Attract Provisions of Deemed Dividend u/s 2(22)(e): ITAT [Read Order]")
Sale Deed does not Mention Shares held by Co-Owners: ITAT upholds Equal Income Tax Liability on Rental Income [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, held that if the sale deed does not mention the share held by co- owners, there would be equal...
![Sale Deed does not Mention Shares held by Co-Owners: ITAT upholds Equal Income Tax Liability on Rental Income [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Sale-Deed-Shares-held-by-Co-Owners-ITAT-Equal-Income-Tax-Liability-Rental-Income-Taxscan.jpg "Sale Deed does not Mention Shares held by Co-Owners: ITAT upholds Equal Income Tax Liability on Rental Income [Read Order]")
Negligence of CHA resulted in attempt of Fraudulent Export: CESTAT reduces Penalty u/s 114AA to Rs. 2 Lakhs [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) reduced the penalty under section 114AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to Rs. 2 Lakh for the negligence...
![Negligence of CHA resulted in attempt of Fraudulent Export: CESTAT reduces Penalty u/s 114AA to Rs. 2 Lakhs [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Fraudulent-Export-Fraudulent-Export-CHA-CESTAT-Penalty-Customs-Excise-Service-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Negligence of CHA resulted in attempt of Fraudulent Export: CESTAT reduces Penalty u/s 114AA to Rs. 2 Lakhs [Read Order]")