![Re-Assessment Proceedings u/s 147 of Income Tax Act can be Initiated on Relevant Material on Which Reasonable Person can Form Requisite Belief that Income Tax has Escaped: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Re-Assessment-Re-Assessment-Proceedings-Income-Tax-Act-Reasonable-Person-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Re-Assessment Proceedings u/s 147 of Income Tax Act can be Initiated on Relevant Material on Which Reasonable Person can Form Requisite Belief that Income Tax has Escaped: ITAT [Read Order]")
Re-Assessment Proceedings u/s 147 of Income Tax Act can be Initiated on Relevant Material on Which Reasonable Person can Form Requisite Belief that Income Tax has Escaped: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that if there is relevant material on the basis of which a reasonable person can form a...
![Form 3CM and Form 3CL issued by DSIR is not mandatory for allowing deduction u/s 35(1)(i) of Income Tax Act: ITAT quashes Revision Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Form-3CM-and-Form-3CL-issued-by-DSIR-deduction-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-quashes-Revision-Order-TAXSCAN.jpg "Form 3CM and Form 3CL issued by DSIR is not mandatory for allowing deduction u/s 35(1)(i) of Income Tax Act: ITAT quashes Revision Order [Read Order]")
![Mere Suspicious Information received from DDIT cant be a ground to raise Addition u/s 69B of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Mere-Suspicious-Information-DDIT-Addition-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Mere Suspicious Information received from DDIT cant be a ground to raise Addition u/s 69B of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty Notice Issued u/s 274 of Income Tax Act not Specifying Charge against Assessee is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Penalty-Notice-Income-Tax-Act-Specifying-Charge-Assessee-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty Notice Issued u/s 274 of Income Tax Act not Specifying Charge against Assessee is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Cancellation of Registration of Charitable Trust u/s 12 AB(4) of Income Tax Act by PCIT not having Jurisdiction is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Cancellation-of-Registration-of-Charitable-Trust-Cancellation-of-Registration-Charitable-Trust-Income-Tax-Act-PCIT-Jurisdiction-is-Invalid-taxscan.jpg "Cancellation of Registration of Charitable Trust u/s 12 AB(4) of Income Tax Act by PCIT not having Jurisdiction is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
Mere Suspicion cannot take place for the purpose of passing an Order: ITAT deletes Addition made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that mere Suspicion cannot take place for the purpose of passing an order hence addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act,...
![Mere Suspicion cannot take place for the purpose of passing an Order: ITAT deletes Addition made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Mere-Suspicion-place-for-the-purpose-of-passing-an-Order-ITAT-deletes-Addition-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mere Suspicion cannot take place for the purpose of passing an Order: ITAT deletes Addition made u/s 68 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Additional Depreciation is allowable u/s 32(1(iia) of Income Tax Act on Plant & Machinery Installed in the Captive Power Plant: ITAT
The Kolkata bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the additional depreciation is allowable under Section 32(1)(iia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on plant and machinery installed...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act Cannot be Imposed for Mistake by Accountant: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a penalty cannot be imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) for a mistake made by the...
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act Cannot be Imposed for Mistake by Accountant: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Imposed-for-Mistake-by-Accountant-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act Cannot be Imposed for Mistake by Accountant: ITAT [Read Order]")
Consultant's failure to comply with Notice of CIT-Exemptions won't result in Non-registration of Trust u/s 12A of Income Tax Act: ITAT Condones delay of 671 days [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the consultant’s failure to comply with the notice of the Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) Exemptions won’t result in...
![Consultants failure to comply with Notice of CIT-Exemptions wont result in Non-registration of Trust u/s 12A of Income Tax Act: ITAT Condones delay of 671 days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Notice-of-CIT-Exemptions-Notice-CIT-Exemptions-CIT-Non-registration-of-Trust-Non-registration-Trust-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-ITAT-Condones-delay-Taxscan.jpg "Consultants failure to comply with Notice of CIT-Exemptions wont result in Non-registration of Trust u/s 12A of Income Tax Act: ITAT Condones delay of 671 days [Read Order]")
Addition Made by AO Towards Share Premium u/s 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act Already Offered to Tax by Assessee Before Settlement Commission: ITAT upholds Deletion of Addition [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the deletion of addition holding that the addition made by the Assessing Officer (AO) towards the share premium under Section...
![Addition Made by AO Towards Share Premium u/s 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act Already Offered to Tax by Assessee Before Settlement Commission: ITAT upholds Deletion of Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Addition-Made-by-AO-Towards-Share-Premium-Addition-AO-Share-Premium-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Addition Made by AO Towards Share Premium u/s 56(2)(viib) of Income Tax Act Already Offered to Tax by Assessee Before Settlement Commission: ITAT upholds Deletion of Addition [Read Order]")
Deduction claimed u/s 80C of Income Tax Act can't be rejected merely on ground of Non-mentioning of Claim in ITR: ITAT [Read Order]
The Kolkata bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the deduction claimed under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be rejected merely on the ground of non-mentioning...
![Deduction claimed u/s 80C of Income Tax Act cant be rejected merely on ground of Non-mentioning of Claim in ITR: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Deduction-claimed-Income-Tax-Act-cant-be-rejected-of-Non-mentioning-of-Claim-ITR-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Deduction claimed u/s 80C of Income Tax Act cant be rejected merely on ground of Non-mentioning of Claim in ITR: ITAT [Read Order]")
