![TCS could not be Comparable for Bench Marking Off Shore Outsourcing Since Assessee Purchases Software for Customers, not a Developer: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/TCS-Bench-Marking-Off-Shore-Outsourcing-Off-Shore-Outsourcing-Assessee-Purchases-Software-for-Customers-Software-Developer-Delhi-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "TCS could not be Comparable for Bench Marking Off Shore Outsourcing Since Assessee Purchases Software for Customers, not a Developer: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
TCS could not be Comparable for Bench Marking Off Shore Outsourcing Since Assessee Purchases Software for Customers, not a Developer: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court has held that Tata Consultancy Service (TCS) could not be comparable for benchmarking offshore outsourcing since the assessee...
![J&K State Rural Roads Development Agency’s Term Deposits Interest Exempted from TDS as is Wholly Financed by Central Govt: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/JK-State-Rural-Development-Deposits-Exempted-TDS-Wholly-Financed-Central-Jammu-Kashmir-TAXSCAN.jpg "J&K State Rural Roads Development Agency’s Term Deposits Interest Exempted from TDS as is Wholly Financed by Central Govt: Jammu & Kashmir HC [Read Order]")
![AO Fails to Follow Procedures in Issuing Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/AO-Procedures-Issuing-Notice-Income-Tax-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO Fails to Follow Procedures in Issuing Notice u/s 148 of Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]")
![Sale of Share was Substantiated with Documentary Evidence, Addition of Capital Gain As Unexplained Income is not Valid: Bombay HC upholds Order of ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Sale-of-Share-was-Substantiated-with-Documentary-Evidence-Sale-of-Share-Documentary-Evidence-Capital-Gain-Unexplained-Income-Bombay-HC-upholds-Order-of-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Sale of Share was Substantiated with Documentary Evidence, Addition of Capital Gain As Unexplained Income is not Valid: Bombay HC upholds Order of ITAT [Read Order]")
Assessee Liable to Pay Late Filing Fee for Delay in Filing TDS Statement: ITAT Dismisses Appeal [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has dismissed an appeal by an assessee who was liable to pay a late filing fee for delay in filing a Tax Deduction at Source (TDS)...
![Assessee Liable to Pay Late Filing Fee for Delay in Filing TDS Statement: ITAT Dismisses Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Assessee-Liable-Pay-Late-Filing-Fee-Delay-Filing-TDS-ITAT-Dismisses-Appeal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Assessee Liable to Pay Late Filing Fee for Delay in Filing TDS Statement: ITAT Dismisses Appeal [Read Order]")
ITAT Directs AO to Delete Addition made on Bogus Purchase without considering Relevant documents of Assessee: Bombay HC Directs Re-Consideration [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court directed the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) to re-consider the order for deleting the addition made by the assessing officer on bogus purchase on the ground of...
![ITAT Directs AO to Delete Addition made on Bogus Purchase without considering Relevant documents of Assessee: Bombay HC Directs Re-Consideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/ITAT-Directs-AO-to-Delete-Addition-made-on-Bogus-Purchase-without-considering-Relevant-documents-of-Assessee-Bombay-HC-Directs-Re-Consideration-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Directs AO to Delete Addition made on Bogus Purchase without considering Relevant documents of Assessee: Bombay HC Directs Re-Consideration [Read Order]")
AO Fails to Follow Procedures to Proceed Reassessment Proceedings under Income Tax Act; issued notices to different PAN Number: ITAT quashes notice u/s 148 [Read Order]
The Kolkata Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act), by the Assessing Officer (AO) for failing to...
![AO Fails to Follow Procedures to Proceed Reassessment Proceedings under Income Tax Act; issued notices to different PAN Number: ITAT quashes notice u/s 148 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/AO-Fails-to-Follow-Procedures-to-Proceed-Reassessment-Proceedings-Proceed-Reassessment-Proceedings-Income-Tax-Act-notices-to-different-PAN-number-PAN-number-ITAT-quashes-notice-taxscan.jpg "AO Fails to Follow Procedures to Proceed Reassessment Proceedings under Income Tax Act; issued notices to different PAN Number: ITAT quashes notice u/s 148 [Read Order]")
Non-Response on Notice Issued By NFAC due to Lack of Familiarity with ITBA Portal: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has directed the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) to re-adjudicate the case of a taxpayer who did not respond to notices issued...
![Non-Response on Notice Issued By NFAC due to Lack of Familiarity with ITBA Portal: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Non-Response-on-Notice-I-NFAC-Lack-of-Familiarity-with-ITBA-Portal-ITAT-directs-Readjudication-Notice-Issued-By-NFAC-taxscan.jpg "Non-Response on Notice Issued By NFAC due to Lack of Familiarity with ITBA Portal: ITAT directs Readjudication [Read Order]")
AO Fails to Clarify Concealment of Particulars of Income or Furnished Inaccurate Particulars: Delhi HC quashes 300% Penalty [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court quashed the 300% penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on grounds that the Assessing Officer (AO) failed to clarify the concealment of particulars...
![AO Fails to Clarify Concealment of Particulars of Income or Furnished Inaccurate Particulars: Delhi HC quashes 300% Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/AO-Fails-to-Clarify-Concealment-of-Particulars-of-Income-Delhi-Highcourt-quashes-300-Penalty-Penalty-Concealment-of-Particulars-of-Income-Delhi-Highcourt-taxscan.jpg "AO Fails to Clarify Concealment of Particulars of Income or Furnished Inaccurate Particulars: Delhi HC quashes 300% Penalty [Read Order]")
Bonafide Impression that Predecessor Already Submitted AIR Not A "Reasonable Cause" for Delay of 526 Days: Kerala HC Upholds Penalty u/s 271FA of IT Act [Read Order]
In a recent Judgement, the Kerala High Court upheld the penalty imposed under section 271A of the Income Tax Act,1961 for non-filing of an Annual Information Return (AIR) by the sub-registrar on the...
![Bonafide Impression that Predecessor Already Submitted AIR Not A Reasonable Cause for Delay of 526 Days: Kerala HC Upholds Penalty u/s 271FA of IT Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Bonafide-Impression-that-Predecessor-Already-Submitted-AIR-Reasonable-Cause-v-Kerala-HC-Upholds-Penalty-of-IT-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Bonafide Impression that Predecessor Already Submitted AIR Not A Reasonable Cause for Delay of 526 Days: Kerala HC Upholds Penalty u/s 271FA of IT Act [Read Order]")
Interest Income earned by Cooperative Bank on Investments made with other Cooperative Bank is eligible for Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Revision Order [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Pune Bench while deleting the revision order passed under Section 263 of Income Tax Act, 1961 held that interest income earned by cooperative bank on...
![Interest Income earned by Cooperative Bank on Investments made with other Cooperative Bank is eligible for Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Revision Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Interest-Income-Cooperative-Bank-Investments-Cooperative-Bank-eligible-Deduction-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Interest Income earned by Cooperative Bank on Investments made with other Cooperative Bank is eligible for Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) Income Tax Act: ITAT deletes Revision Order [Read Order]")