![Cash Payment of Defaulted EMI Instalment to Financier after Cheque Bounce is “Reasonable Cause”: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 273B [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Cash-Payment-of-Defaulted-EMI-Instalment-to-Financier-Cheque-Bounce-is-Reasonable-Cause-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-us-273B-TAXSCAN.jpg "Cash Payment of Defaulted EMI Instalment to Financier after Cheque Bounce is “Reasonable Cause”: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 273B [Read Order]")
Cash Payment of Defaulted EMI Instalment to Financier after Cheque Bounce is “Reasonable Cause”: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 273B [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the penalty imposed under Section 273B of the Income Tax Act holding that the...
![ITAT confirms Addition of Unexplained Income for SBN Deposits during Demonetization Period in Absence of Legitimate Source [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ITAT-Unexplained-Income-SBN-Deposits-during-Demonetization-Absence-of-Legitimate-Source-taxscan.jpg "ITAT confirms Addition of Unexplained Income for SBN Deposits during Demonetization Period in Absence of Legitimate Source [Read Order]")
![ITAT quashes Penalty Order as Non-Filing of Income Tax Return and Concealing Particulars Cannot be Levied u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ITAT-quashes-Penalty-Order-as-Non-Filing-of-Income-Tax-Return-and-Concealing-Particulars-Levied-u-s-2711c-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT quashes Penalty Order as Non-Filing of Income Tax Return and Concealing Particulars Cannot be Levied u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
![ITAT Quashes Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Solely Based on Vague Information from Investigation Wing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ITAT-Quashes-Reassessment-Proceedings-Vague-Information-from-Investigation-Wing-Reassessment-Proceedings-Investigation-Wing-Reassessment-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Quashes Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Solely Based on Vague Information from Investigation Wing [Read Order]")
![Price Incurred in Excess of FRP by Sugar Cooperatives for Sugar Cane Purchased Allowable as per Latest Amendment u/s 155(19): ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Price-Incurred-in-Excess-of-FRP-Sugar-Cooperatives-for-Sugar-Cane-Purchased-Allowable-as-per-Latest-Amendment-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Price Incurred in Excess of FRP by Sugar Cooperatives for Sugar Cane Purchased Allowable as per Latest Amendment u/s 155(19): ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Unfair Representation During Liquidation Process [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently deleted the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, considering the unfair representation of the assessee during...
![ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Unfair Representation During Liquidation Process [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ITAT-Penalty-us-2711c-Unfair-Representation-During-Liquidation-Process-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for Unfair Representation During Liquidation Process [Read Order]")
Reassessment Proceedings Without Issuance of Notice u/s 143(2) is Bad in Law: ITAT quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT )has held that reassessment proceedings without the issuance of notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is bad in law. ...
![Reassessment Proceedings Without Issuance of Notice u/s 143(2) is Bad in Law: ITAT quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Reassessment-Proceedings-Issuance-of-Notice-ITAT-quashes-Assessment-Order-taxscan.jpg "Reassessment Proceedings Without Issuance of Notice u/s 143(2) is Bad in Law: ITAT quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]")
Failure to file Audit Report through a Qualified CA: ITAT upholds Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has recently upheld a penalty under Section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 as the assessee had failed to file the audit report through a...
![Failure to file Audit Report through a Qualified CA: ITAT upholds Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Failure-to-file-Audit-Report-through-a-Qualified-CA-ITAT-upholds-Penalty-us-271B-of-Income-Tax-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to file Audit Report through a Qualified CA: ITAT upholds Penalty u/s 271B of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Lessor entitled to Claim Depreciation on Leased Assets under Finance Lease: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Lessor-Depreciation-Leased-Assets-under-Finance-Lease-Depreciation-on-Leased-Assets-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Lessor entitled to Claim Depreciation on Leased Assets under Finance Lease: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Deletion of Unexplained Income without a Remand Report is Invalid: ITAT quashes Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Deletion-of-unexplained-income-unexplained-income-remand-report-ITAT-order-taxscan.jpg "Deletion of Unexplained Income without a Remand Report is Invalid: ITAT quashes Order [Read Order]")
Common Interest received on Deposits with Co-Operative Bank as Income is not Eligible for Deduction u/s.80P(2)(d): ITAT [Read Order]
The Bangalore bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the common interest received on deposits with co-operative Bank as income is not eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(d)...
![Common Interest received on Deposits with Co-Operative Bank as Income is not Eligible for Deduction u/s.80P(2)(d): ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Common-interest-received-on-deposits-Co-operative-Bank-as-income-is-not-eligible-for-deduction-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Common Interest received on Deposits with Co-Operative Bank as Income is not Eligible for Deduction u/s.80P(2)(d): ITAT [Read Order]")
Lack of Jurisdiction u/s 153C owing to Absence of Incriminating Materials: ITAT dismisses Revenue's Appeal [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, dismissed the revenue’s appeal, on finding that there is lack of jurisdiction under Section 153C of...
![Lack of Jurisdiction u/s 153C owing to Absence of Incriminating Materials: ITAT dismisses Revenues Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Lack-of-Jurisdiction-Absence-of-Incriminating-Materials-Jurisdiction-Incriminating-Materials-ITAT-Revenues-Appeal-taxscan.jpg "Lack of Jurisdiction u/s 153C owing to Absence of Incriminating Materials: ITAT dismisses Revenues Appeal [Read Order]")