CBI arrests Two Income Tax Officials in Bribery Case at Silchar, Assam
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has arrested two Income Tax Officials in relation to bribe allegations. The CBI team from Shillong...
![ITAT deletes ₹58 Lakh Capital Investment addition due to Name Discrepancy of Taxpayer in Records [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Cuttack-Income-Tax-capital-investment-taxscan.jpg "ITAT deletes ₹58 Lakh Capital Investment addition due to Name Discrepancy of Taxpayer in Records [Read Order]")
![“Treating Cash Deposits from ‘Business Income’ as ‘Unexplained’ Results in Double Taxation”: ITAT Quashes S.69A Addition under Income Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Income-Tax-Business-Income-Cash-deposit-Double-Taxation-taxscan.jpg "“Treating Cash Deposits from ‘Business Income’ as ‘Unexplained’ Results in Double Taxation”: ITAT Quashes S.69A Addition under Income Tax [Read Order]")
![Non-Compliance and Failure to Explain Bank Credits: ITAT upholds ₹3.13 Crore S.69 Addition under Income Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Income-Tax-ITAT-Income-Tax-Act-Cash-deposits-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-Compliance and Failure to Explain Bank Credits: ITAT upholds ₹3.13 Crore S.69 Addition under Income Tax [Read Order]")
![Unexplained Cash Deposit during Demonetization: ITAT directs Assessee to Establish Genuineness [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-Unexplained-cash-deposit-Demonetization-Unexplained-income-during-demonetization-taxscan.jpg "Unexplained Cash Deposit during Demonetization: ITAT directs Assessee to Establish Genuineness [Read Order]")
Failure to Prove University's Profit Motive: Chattisgarh HC quashes Denial of S.10(23C) Exemption Claim under Income Tax [Read Order]
Recently in a ruling, the Chhattisgarh High Court quashed the Revenue’s denial of a university's application for income tax exemption under Section 10(23C)(vi) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ( ITA ),...
![Failure to Prove Universitys Profit Motive: Chattisgarh HC quashes Denial of S.10(23C) Exemption Claim under Income Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Claim-Income-tax-exemption-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Prove Universitys Profit Motive: Chattisgarh HC quashes Denial of S.10(23C) Exemption Claim under Income Tax [Read Order]")
Delhi HC quashes Income Tax Reassessment Advanced on Same Grounds as Prior Assessment and Order [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court recently allowed a Petition seeking to quash an impugned reassessment order issued by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-63(1), Delhi against the Financials of the Petitioner...
![Delhi HC quashes Income Tax Reassessment Advanced on Same Grounds as Prior Assessment and Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Delhi-high-court-Income-Tax-Reassessment-Prior-Assessment-and-Order-Income-Tax-Taxscan.jpeg "Delhi HC quashes Income Tax Reassessment Advanced on Same Grounds as Prior Assessment and Order [Read Order]")
Misleading Advice by Auditor Led to Excess Income Tax Payment: ITAT Orders Rectification [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) of Bangalore in a recent case ordered rectification of the revised return filed by the assessee, observing that misadvice by the assessee’s tax auditor led...
![Misleading Advice by Auditor Led to Excess Income Tax Payment: ITAT Orders Rectification [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-ITAT-Orders-Excess-Income-Tax-Excess-Income-Tax-Payment-Auditor-Taxscan-.jpg "Misleading Advice by Auditor Led to Excess Income Tax Payment: ITAT Orders Rectification [Read Order]")
Karnataka HC sets aside Income Tax Order Passed u/s 201(1) & 201(1A), exceeding reasonable period of 4 years [Read Order]
The Karnataka High Court, in a recent ruling, set aside the order passed under Sections 201(1) and 201(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as being beyond the reasonable period of 4 years. In this...
![Karnataka HC sets aside Income Tax Order Passed u/s 201(1) & 201(1A), exceeding reasonable period of 4 years [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Karnataka-HC-Income-Tax-Order-exceeding-period-4-years-taxscan.jpg "Karnataka HC sets aside Income Tax Order Passed u/s 201(1) & 201(1A), exceeding reasonable period of 4 years [Read Order]")
No Penalty after Completion of Scrutiny Assessment u/s 143(3) of IT Act, when necessary Evidence is Furnished: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court directed for the deletion of the penalty imposed by the Assessment Unit ( AO ) and set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), even after the petitioner has...
![No Penalty after Completion of Scrutiny Assessment u/s 143(3) of IT Act, when necessary Evidence is Furnished: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-Scrutiny-Assessment-Delhi-High-Court-ITAT-penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Penalty after Completion of Scrutiny Assessment u/s 143(3) of IT Act, when necessary Evidence is Furnished: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Deposit already made under IDS: Bombay HC directs Dept to Issue Certificates [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-Bombay-HC-Income-tax-IDS-scheme-IDS-2016-TAXSCAN.jpg "Income Tax Deposit already made under IDS: Bombay HC directs Dept to Issue Certificates [Read Order]")
JCIT cannot Transfer Case u/s 127 to Subordinate Officer without Hearing Assessee: Patna HC [Read Order]
The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax ( JCIT ) cannot transfer a case to the subordinate officer behind the back of the assessee. The Patna High Court ruled that the transfer shall take place only...
