![Once Income Tax Penalty Quashed for Lack of Concealment, 276C Prosecution Cannot Survive: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/28/500x300_2108521-income-tax-penalty-lack-concealment-prosecution-rajasthan-hc-taxscan.webp "Once Income Tax Penalty Quashed for Lack of Concealment, 276C Prosecution Cannot Survive: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]")
Once Income Tax Penalty Quashed for Lack of Concealment, 276C Prosecution Cannot Survive: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Rajasthan High Court explained that when theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has already removed a penalty after finding...
![Is Income Tax Penalty Notice without Specifying Limb u/s 271(1)(c) Valid? Supreme Court to Examine Revenue Petition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/11/21/250x150_2107199-income-tax-penalty-notice-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "Is Income Tax Penalty Notice without Specifying Limb u/s 271(1)(c) Valid? Supreme Court to Examine Revenue Petition [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Penalty Cannot Be Levied on Estimated Additions for Alleged Bogus Purchases: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/20/250x150_2089066-income-tax-pently-bogus-purchases-sales-taxscan.webp "Income Tax Penalty Cannot Be Levied on Estimated Additions for Alleged Bogus Purchases: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Mere Disallowance of Capitalized Interest Not Misreporting: ITAT deletes Income Tax Penalty u/s 270A [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/16/250x150_2077533-mere-disallowance-capitalized-interest-itat-income-tax-penalty-taxscan.webp "Mere Disallowance of Capitalized Interest Not Misreporting: ITAT deletes Income Tax Penalty u/s 270A [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) for Multiple Defaults Reduced to One: ITAT Limits Levy to Rs. 10,000 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/15/250x150_2076930-income-tax-penalty-itat-taxscan.webp "Income Tax Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) for Multiple Defaults Reduced to One: ITAT Limits Levy to Rs. 10,000 [Read Order]")
Salaried Taxpayer Wins ₹1.46 Lakh Income Tax Penalty Case Despite Misreporting: Here’s How [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) provided relief to a salaried taxpayer who was wrongly penalised for underreporting income. The tribunal cancelled a ...
![Salaried Taxpayer Wins ₹1.46 Lakh Income Tax Penalty Case Despite Misreporting: Here’s How [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/06/500x300_2073465-salaried-taxpayer-income-tax-penalty-income-tax-taxscan.webp "Salaried Taxpayer Wins ₹1.46 Lakh Income Tax Penalty Case Despite Misreporting: Here’s How [Read Order]")
Deduction Claim on Unpaid Ad-hoc Bonus from AY 1984-85: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12L Income Tax Penalty from 2002 ITAT Order citing Plausibility [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court recently set aside a penalty of ₹12,82,700 imposed on Carona Limited, noting that merely claiming deduction on unpaid ad-hoc bonus could not attract penalty under Section...
![Deduction Claim on Unpaid Ad-hoc Bonus from AY 1984-85: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12L Income Tax Penalty from 2002 ITAT Order citing Plausibility [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/500x300_2063729-deduction-deduction-claim-deduction-claim-on-unpaid-ad-hoc-bonus-ad-hoc-bonus-taxscan.webp "Deduction Claim on Unpaid Ad-hoc Bonus from AY 1984-85: Bombay HC Quashes ₹12L Income Tax Penalty from 2002 ITAT Order citing Plausibility [Read Order]")
Recording of satisfaction u/s 271E insufficient for Income Tax Penalty proceedings u/s 271D: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]
In a recent decision, the High Court of Rajasthan has held that recording of satisfaction by DCIT under Section 271E of the Income Tax Act is insufficient for the initiation and imposition of...
![Recording of satisfaction u/s 271E insufficient for Income Tax Penalty proceedings u/s 271D: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Rajasthan-High-Court-Penalty-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Recording of satisfaction u/s 271E insufficient for Income Tax Penalty proceedings u/s 271D: Rajasthan HC [Read Order]")
No Misreporting in PF and Cess Deduction Claims Made in Good Faith: ITAT quashes 84 Lakhs S.270 Penalty under Income Tax [Read Order]
Recently in a ruling the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Bangalore quashed an ₹84 lakh penalty imposed on a company for under-reporting income under the Income Tax Act 1961 (ITA), specifically...
![No Misreporting in PF and Cess Deduction Claims Made in Good Faith: ITAT quashes 84 Lakhs S.270 Penalty under Income Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Misreporting-PF-Cess-Deduction-Claims-ITAT-Penalty-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpeg "No Misreporting in PF and Cess Deduction Claims Made in Good Faith: ITAT quashes 84 Lakhs S.270 Penalty under Income Tax [Read Order]")
ITAT sets aside Penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) as Demonstrates Sufficient Cause for 326 Day Delay in Quantum Appeal and 1 Delay in Penalty Appeal [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside the penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, after the assessee demonstrated "sufficient cause" for...
![ITAT sets aside Penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) as Demonstrates Sufficient Cause for 326 Day Delay in Quantum Appeal and 1 Delay in Penalty Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-Penalty-Demonstrates-Sufficient-Cause-Quantum-Appeal-Penalty-Appeal-taxscan.jpg "ITAT sets aside Penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) as Demonstrates Sufficient Cause for 326 Day Delay in Quantum Appeal and 1 Delay in Penalty Appeal [Read Order]")
Non-Participation in GST Proceedings Confirmed Tax Liability with 100% Penalty: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit to Contest [Read Order]
The Madras High Court orders pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed demand to nullify the contested order. The court's decision came in light of the assessee's non-participation in the Goods and Services...
![Non-Participation in GST Proceedings Confirmed Tax Liability with 100% Penalty: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit to Contest [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Goods-and-service-tax-Madras-High-court-Tax-Liability-GST-Proceedings-GST-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Non-Participation in GST Proceedings Confirmed Tax Liability with 100% Penalty: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit to Contest [Read Order]")