Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Delhi HC Prohibits Further Income Tax Proceedings against Kapil Sibal
On Thursday (23rd March 2023), the Delhi High Court, presided by the division bench of Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju...
![Expenditure incurred by Flipkart towards ESOP eligible for Deduction u/s 37 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Flipkart-ESOP-Deduction-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Tax-ITAT-Expenditure-incurred-taxscan.jpg "Expenditure incurred by Flipkart towards ESOP eligible for Deduction u/s 37 of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
No TDS applicable on Race Promotion Contract Fees Taxable at the hands of Payee: ITAT quashes Income Tax Disallowance [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT )has recently quashed the disallowance for payment done in lieu of race promotion contract expenses as the same was taxable at the hands of...
![No TDS applicable on Race Promotion Contract Fees Taxable at the hands of Payee: ITAT quashes Income Tax Disallowance [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/TDS-Race-promotion-contract-Taxable-payee-Income-Tax-Contract-Fees-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "No TDS applicable on Race Promotion Contract Fees Taxable at the hands of Payee: ITAT quashes Income Tax Disallowance [Read Order]")
Provisions of Deemed Gift u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) of Income Tax Act cannot be Applied Retrospectively: ITAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has recently held that provisions of deemed gift under section 56(2)(vii)(b) of Income Tax Act 1961 could not be applied retrospectively. ...
![Provisions of Deemed Gift u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) of Income Tax Act cannot be Applied Retrospectively: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Deemed-Gift-Gift-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Provisions of Deemed Gift u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) of Income Tax Act cannot be Applied Retrospectively: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Liability for paying Tax either under ‘Construction of Complex Service’ or ‘Works Contract’ would lie on Builder or promoter prior to 01.07.2010: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), ruled that there is no liability for paying tax either under ‘construction of complex service’ or ‘works...
![No Liability for paying Tax either under ‘Construction of Complex Service’ or ‘Works Contract’ would lie on Builder or promoter prior to 01.07.2010: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Liability-for-paying-Tax-paying-Tax-Construction-of-Complex-Service-Works-Contract-Builder-promoter-CESTAT-taxscasn.jpg "No Liability for paying Tax either under ‘Construction of Complex Service’ or ‘Works Contract’ would lie on Builder or promoter prior to 01.07.2010: CESTAT [Read Order]")
