Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Fees Paid by Law Firm to use Name & Goodwill of Founder is Business Expense, Deductible u/s 37 of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC rules in Favour of Remfry & Sagar [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Remfry-Sagar-Delhi-High-Court-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Fees Paid by Law Firm to use Name & Goodwill of Founder is Business Expense, Deductible u/s 37 of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC rules in Favour of Remfry & Sagar [Read Order]")
Fees Paid by Law Firm to use Name & Goodwill of Founder is Business Expense, Deductible u/s 37 of Income Tax Act: Delhi HC rules in Favour of Remfry & Sagar [Read Order]
In a recent case, the Delhi High Court has held that the fees paid by IPR law firm Remfry & Sagar to acquire the goodwill of the founder is a...
![Relief to Reebok India: CESTAT rules Technical Know-How not Registered in India, cannot be Taxable under IPR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Relief-to-Reebok-India-CESTAT-rules-IPR-Reebok-India-taxscan.jpg "Relief to Reebok India: CESTAT rules Technical Know-How not Registered in India, cannot be Taxable under IPR [Read Order]")
![Transfer of Technical Know-How falls under IPR Service & Liable to Service Tax only if IPR Registered under Indian Law: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Technical-Know-How-Transfer-of-Technical-Know-How-Transfer-Service-Liable-IPR-Service-Tax-IPR-Registered-under-Indian-Law-Indian-Law-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Transfer of Technical Know-How falls under IPR Service & Liable to Service Tax only if IPR Registered under Indian Law: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Payment of Royalty for IPR Services not Taxable in India: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Payment-royalty-IPR-services-taxable-India-CESTAT-Service-Tax-Demand-TAXSCAN.jpg "Payment of Royalty for IPR Services not Taxable in India: CESTAT quashes Service Tax Demand [Read Order]")
![Different Branded, Unbranded Shoes alleged to be violative of IPR infringement to be absolutely confiscated as being Prohibited Goods under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/IPR-Infringement-Confiscated-Customs-Act-CESTAT-Shoes-Taxscan.jpg "Different Branded, Unbranded Shoes alleged to be violative of IPR infringement to be absolutely confiscated as being Prohibited Goods under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Punjab & Haryana HC directs GST Dept. to grant appropriate time to Subway before forcing it to pay differential GST on IPR
The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed the GST Dept. to grant appropriate time to Subway before forcing it to pay differential GST on Intellectual Property Rights (IPR). The Subway has...
![Permanent Transfer of IPRs attracts 18% GST: CBIC [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Permanent-Transfer-IPR-GST-CBIC-taxscan.jpeg "Permanent Transfer of IPRs attracts 18% GST: CBIC [Read Notification]")
![No Service Tax applicable on Permanent Transfer of IPR: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/No-Service-Tax-Permanent-Transfer-IPR-CESTAT-taxscan.jpeg "No Service Tax applicable on Permanent Transfer of IPR: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Renting of E-bikes and Bicycles without operator attracts 18% GST: AAR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/E-bikes-Bicycles-Renting-E-bikes-AAR-Renting-Bicycles-GST-Taxscan.jpg "Renting of E-bikes and Bicycles without operator attracts 18% GST: AAR [Read Order]")
![‘Know How’ isn’t covered under IPR, No Service Tax applicable: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Know-How.jpeg "‘Know How’ isn’t covered under IPR, No Service Tax applicable: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Depreciation cannot be disallowed merely on ground that IPR was not used for Manufacturing Activities: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]
A division bench of the Delhi High Court has held that the claim for depreciation under Section 32 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be disallowed merely on the ground that the intellectual property...
![Depreciation cannot be disallowed merely on ground that IPR was not used for Manufacturing Activities: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Depreciation-Taxscan.jpg "Depreciation cannot be disallowed merely on ground that IPR was not used for Manufacturing Activities: Delhi HC [Read Judgment]")