Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Vagueness and Ambiguity in recording of Satisfaction would nullify Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/No-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Vagueness and Ambiguity in recording of Satisfaction would nullify Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]")
Vagueness and Ambiguity in recording of Satisfaction would nullify Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune bench has held that the vagueness and ambiguity in recording of satisfaction would nullify the entire...
![Reference of Matter by AO to DVO for valuation of Property is Not Mandatory: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/ITAT-Agra-Taxscan.jpg "Reference of Matter by AO to DVO for valuation of Property is Not Mandatory: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Service of Notice for Re-Assessment is not mere Procedural Requirement: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Tax-Notice-Taxscan.jpg "Service of Notice for Re-Assessment is not mere Procedural Requirement: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Assessment Order inconsistent with a Binding Precedent can be rectified by invoking S. 154: Calcutta High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Voting-Rights-Calcutta-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Assessment Order inconsistent with a Binding Precedent can be rectified by invoking S. 154: Calcutta High Court [Read Judgment]")
![ITAT Quashes S. 158BC Assessment since Notice u/s 143(2) was not Issued [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Notice-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT Quashes S. 158BC Assessment since Notice u/s 143(2) was not Issued [Read Order]")
![CBDT Issues Guidelines for Selection of Cases for Scrutiny for the year 2017-18 [Read Instruction]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Re-Assessment-Taxscan.jpg "CBDT Issues Guidelines for Selection of Cases for Scrutiny for the year 2017-18 [Read Instruction]")
