ITAT Chennai
Explore the latest ITAT Chennai judgments, orders, and appellate decisions on direct tax matters from the Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
![Investment Allowance claimed u/s. 32AC of Income Tax Act towards new asset shall not allowable if assessee already claim depreciation on New Asset: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Investment-Allowance-claimed-Income-Tax-Act-towards-new-asset-claim-depreciation-on-New-Asset-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Investment Allowance claimed u/s. 32AC of Income Tax Act towards new asset shall not allowable if assessee already claim depreciation on New Asset: ITAT [Read Order]")
Investment Allowance claimed u/s. 32AC of Income Tax Act towards new asset shall not allowable if assessee already claim depreciation on New Asset: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Chennai bench held that investment allowance claimed under Section 32AC of the Income tax Act,1961 towards...
![Person failing to furnish Return of Income is deemed to have concealed particulars of his income: ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Person-failing-to-furnish-return-of-income-return-of-income-income-ITAT-ITAT-upholds-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Person failing to furnish Return of Income is deemed to have concealed particulars of his income: ITAT upholds Penalty [Read Order]")
![Retained Amount from Security Deposit of leased housing property due to cancellation of Lease Deed is assessable under head ‘Income from House Property’: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Retained-amount-from-Security-Deposit-of-leased-housing-property-due-to-cancellation-of-Lease-income-from-House-Property-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Retained Amount from Security Deposit of leased housing property due to cancellation of Lease Deed is assessable under head ‘Income from House Property’: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Loss on Forward Exchange Contracts of export business are business loss, not speculative loss u/s 43(5) of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Loss-on-Forward-Exchange-Contracts-export-business-business-loss-speculative-loss-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Loss on Forward Exchange Contracts of export business are business loss, not speculative loss u/s 43(5) of Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Extraction of Minerals from Beach sand is Manufacturing Process u/s 2(29BA) of Income Tax Act: ITAT allows Income Tax Deduction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Extraction-Minerals-Beach-sand-Manufacturing-Process-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Income-Tax-Deduction-TAXSCAN.jpg "Extraction of Minerals from Beach sand is Manufacturing Process u/s 2(29BA) of Income Tax Act: ITAT allows Income Tax Deduction [Read Order]")
No addition can be made u/s 153A in absence of incriminating evidence found as a result of search, if the assessment is unabated: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that in absence of any incriminating material, no addition can be made in the assessment framed under Section 153A/153C of the Income Tax...
![No addition can be made u/s 153A in absence of incriminating evidence found as a result of search, if the assessment is unabated: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/No-additio-absence-of-incriminating-evidence-found-as-a-result-of-search-assessment-is-unabated-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No addition can be made u/s 153A in absence of incriminating evidence found as a result of search, if the assessment is unabated: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Separate Agreement between Eshakthi and its Non-Resident US Subsidiary for Reimbursement of Expenses: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act 1961, as there was no separate agreement between the Eshakthi and...
![No Separate Agreement between Eshakthi and its Non-Resident US Subsidiary for Reimbursement of Expenses: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Separate-Agreement-ITAT-No-Separate-Agreement-between-Eshakthi-and-its-Non-Resident-US-disallowance-taxscan.jpg "No Separate Agreement between Eshakthi and its Non-Resident US Subsidiary for Reimbursement of Expenses: ITAT Upholds Deletion of Disallowance u/s 40(a)(i) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
ITAT directs to Estimate 25% Profit Towards Income from Sale of Milk Products Deposited in Bank During Demonetisation Period [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Chennai Bench directed to estimate 25% profit towards income from sale of milk products deposited in banks during the demonetisation period. Kannan...
![ITAT directs to Estimate 25% Profit Towards Income from Sale of Milk Products Deposited in Bank During Demonetisation Period [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ITAT-directs-to-Estimate-25-Profit-Towards-Income-from-Sale-of-Milk-Products-ITAT-Profit-Sale-of-Milk-Products-Demonetisation-Period-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT directs to Estimate 25% Profit Towards Income from Sale of Milk Products Deposited in Bank During Demonetisation Period [Read Order]")
Section 269SS not applicable when Substantial Sale Consideration of Immovable property is evidenced by registered agreement: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271D [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that Sale transaction evidenced by registered agreement prevents implementation of Section 269SS from curbing black money The...
![Section 269SS not applicable when Substantial Sale Consideration of Immovable property is evidenced by registered agreement: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271D [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Substantial-Sale-Sale-Consideration-Consideration-of-Immovable-property-Immovable-property-ITAT-deletes-Penalty-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Section 269SS not applicable when Substantial Sale Consideration of Immovable property is evidenced by registered agreement: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271D [Read Order]")
ITAT deletes Addition u/s 80IC on ground of Section 92BA being omitted by the Finance Act, 2017 [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal held that the issue is no longer res integra in view of the decision of the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the case of PCIT vs. Texport...
![ITAT deletes Addition u/s 80IC on ground of Section 92BA being omitted by the Finance Act, 2017 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/ITAT-Section-Finance-Act-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT deletes Addition u/s 80IC on ground of Section 92BA being omitted by the Finance Act, 2017 [Read Order]")
Mere System Error is no basis for Disallowance: ITAT allows full Deduction to Assessee u/s 10AA after Re-computation by AO [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Trinbunal (ITAT) held that the credit of advance tax and TDS credit would be allowable to the assessee and those entities have not claimed the credit...
![Mere System Error is no basis for Disallowance: ITAT allows full Deduction to Assessee u/s 10AA after Re-computation by AO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Mere-system-error-is-no-basis-for-disallowance-ITAT-allows-full-deduction-re-computation-by-AO-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mere System Error is no basis for Disallowance: ITAT allows full Deduction to Assessee u/s 10AA after Re-computation by AO [Read Order]")
Mere Non Acceptance of Claim made by assessee would not lead to Automatic Levy of Penalty u/s 270A(9)(a): ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax appellate tribunal (ITAT) held that Merely because the claim made by the assessee was not accepted would not lead to automatic levy of penalty. It is settled law...
![Mere Non Acceptance of Claim made by assessee would not lead to Automatic Levy of Penalty u/s 270A(9)(a): ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Non-Acceptance-Claim-Mere-Non-Acceptance-of-Claim-assessee-Levy-of-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Mere Non Acceptance of Claim made by assessee would not lead to Automatic Levy of Penalty u/s 270A(9)(a): ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]")