![ITAT Remands Case Back to CIT(A) for Reconsideration Due to Non-Compliance and Evidence Issues [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ITAT-Remands-ITAT-Cuttack-CITA-Evidence-Issues-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-Commissioner-Of-Income-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Remands Case Back to CIT(A) for Reconsideration Due to Non-Compliance and Evidence Issues [Read Order]")
ITAT Remands Case Back to CIT(A) for Reconsideration Due to Non-Compliance and Evidence Issues [Read Order]
In the recent case, the Cuttack bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) remanded the appeal by the assessee against the Commissioner Of Income...
![Delay in Filing Income Tax Appeal as Orders sent to Email was in Spam Folder: ITAT Condones Delay of 145 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/ITAT-Cuttack-Income-Tax-Appeal-Condonation-of-Delay-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "Delay in Filing Income Tax Appeal as Orders sent to Email was in Spam Folder: ITAT Condones Delay of 145 Days [Read Order]")
![Maintenance & Electricity Charges not in the form of Deposits excluded from Cost of Property for computing LTCG: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Maintenance-and-Electricity-Charges-Deposits-Cost-of-Property-for-computing-LTCG-Cost-of-Property-LTCG-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Maintenance & Electricity Charges not in the form of Deposits excluded from Cost of Property for computing LTCG: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT confirms Addition of Unexplained Income for SBN Deposits during Demonetization Period in Absence of Legitimate Source [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ITAT-Unexplained-Income-SBN-Deposits-during-Demonetization-Absence-of-Legitimate-Source-taxscan.jpg "ITAT confirms Addition of Unexplained Income for SBN Deposits during Demonetization Period in Absence of Legitimate Source [Read Order]")
Penalty cannot be levied u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act when Sustainability of Addition is Debatable: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Cuttack Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, held that penalty cannot be levied u/s 271(1)(c) of income tax act, when sustainability of...
![Penalty cannot be levied u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act when Sustainability of Addition is Debatable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Sustainability-of-Addition-ITAT-Income-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty cannot be levied u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act when Sustainability of Addition is Debatable: ITAT [Read Order]")
Revisional Order by PCIT will be invalid if Original Reassessment order was not validly passed: Orissa HC [Read Order]
The Orissa High Court (HC) has held the revisional order by PCIT will be invalid if the original reassessment order was not validly passed. The Revenue is directed to challenge the common order...
![Revisional Order by PCIT will be invalid if Original Reassessment order was not validly passed: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Revisional-order-PCIT-Reassessment-order-Orissa-High-Court-taxscan-.jpg "Revisional Order by PCIT will be invalid if Original Reassessment order was not validly passed: Orissa HC [Read Order]")
![Vague Show Cause Notice: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Show-Cause-Notice-ITAT-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Vague Show Cause Notice: ITAT deletes Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Mistakes must be Expected during Migration from Physical Hearing to Faceless: ITAT Imposes Cost of Rs. 25,000 on Assessee for Restoration of Ex-Parte Order [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Cuttack Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, while imposing a cost of Rs 25,000 on the assessee, for restoration of ex- parte order, held...
![Mistakes must be Expected during Migration from Physical Hearing to Faceless: ITAT Imposes Cost of Rs. 25,000 on Assessee for Restoration of Ex-Parte Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Physical-Hearing-Faceless-Physical-Hearing-to-Faceless-ITAT-Ex-Parte-Order-Restoration-taxscan.jpg "Mistakes must be Expected during Migration from Physical Hearing to Faceless: ITAT Imposes Cost of Rs. 25,000 on Assessee for Restoration of Ex-Parte Order [Read Order]")
![Revisional Order against a Deceased Assessee is not valid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Revisional-Order-Deceased-Assessee-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Revisional Order against a Deceased Assessee is not valid: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Expenditure Incurred towards Computer Software and Stationery, Revenue in Nature: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Expenditure-Expenditure-Incurred-Computer-Software-Stationery-Computer-Software-and-Stationery-Revenue-Revenue-in-Nature-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Expenditure Incurred towards Computer Software and Stationery, Revenue in Nature: ITAT [Read Order]")
Income Tax Benefit to Trust u/s 11 cannot be Denied for Mere One Day Delay in filing of Audit Report: ITAT [Read Order]
The Cuttack Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the Income Tax benefit to trust under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act 1961 could not be denied for mere one day delay in...
![Income Tax Benefit to Trust u/s 11 cannot be Denied for Mere One Day Delay in filing of Audit Report: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Benefit-to-Trust-Delay-in-filing-of-Audit-Report-filing-of-Audit-Report-Audit-Report-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Income Tax Benefit to Trust u/s 11 cannot be Denied for Mere One Day Delay in filing of Audit Report: ITAT [Read Order]")