![Mere filing of Affidavit is not sufficient to prove the Capacity and Source of Persons who gave Money to Assessee: ITAT grants Rs.10 lakh Relief [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Mere-filing-of-Affidavit-sufficient-Capacity-and-Source-Capacity-Assessee-Money-to-Assessee-Money-ITAT-Relief-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Mere filing of Affidavit is not sufficient to prove the Capacity and Source of Persons who gave Money to Assessee: ITAT grants Rs.10 lakh Relief [Read Order]")
Mere filing of Affidavit is not sufficient to prove the Capacity and Source of Persons who gave Money to Assessee: ITAT grants Rs.10 lakh Relief [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) while granting Rupees 10 lakh relief to assessee held that merely...
![FTC cannot be Denied If Requirements of Rule 128(9) of the Income Tax Rules Are Not Violated: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/FTC-Income-Tax-Rules-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "FTC cannot be Denied If Requirements of Rule 128(9) of the Income Tax Rules Are Not Violated: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Late Fee and Interest in respect of the TDS Statements cannot be Levied prior to 01/06/2015: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/TDS-Statements-TDS-Late-Fee-Interest-ITAT-Income-Tax-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Late Fee and Interest in respect of the TDS Statements cannot be Levied prior to 01/06/2015: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Payment to Contract Teachers does not amount to ‘Fee for Professional Services’, TDS u/s 194J Not Applicable: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Payment-to-Contract-Teachers-Contract-Teachers-Fee-for-Professional-Services-Fee-Professional-Services-TDS-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Payment to Contract Teachers does not amount to ‘Fee for Professional Services’, TDS u/s 194J Not Applicable: ITAT [Read Order]")
![TDS Credit cannot be Denied when Form 26AS along with Reconciliation of Income as per Books are Produced before AO: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/TDS-Credit-TDS-Form-26AS-Income-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "TDS Credit cannot be Denied when Form 26AS along with Reconciliation of Income as per Books are Produced before AO: ITAT [Read Order]")
Salary received in India for Services rendered in USA during Short Term Assignment Not Taxable in India: ITAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the addition made by the Assessing officer (AO) and ruled that the salary received by the assessee in India for the services...
![Salary received in India for Services rendered in USA during Short Term Assignment Not Taxable in India: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Salary-received-India-for-Services-Assignment-Taxable-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Salary received in India for Services rendered in USA during Short Term Assignment Not Taxable in India: ITAT [Read Order]")
Non-Compliance of Notices and Non-furnishing of Evidence Even After Five Opportunities granted by AO: ITAT Imposes Cost of Rs. 10,000 [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Hyderabad Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, imposed a cost of Rs 10,000, on non-compliance of notices and non-furnishing of evidence, even...
![Non-Compliance of Notices and Non-furnishing of Evidence Even After Five Opportunities granted by AO: ITAT Imposes Cost of Rs. 10,000 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Notices-Non-furnishing-Five-Opportunities-ITAT-Cost-Income-Tax-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Compliance of Notices and Non-furnishing of Evidence Even After Five Opportunities granted by AO: ITAT Imposes Cost of Rs. 10,000 [Read Order]")
No Reasonable Cause for Delay in filing Appeal: ITAT Refuses to Condone Huge Delay of 3047 based on Vague Reasons [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has refused to condone the huge delay of 3047 days based on vague reasons and on the ground of absence of reasonable cause for filing...
![No Reasonable Cause for Delay in filing Appeal: ITAT Refuses to Condone Huge Delay of 3047 based on Vague Reasons [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Reasonable-Cause-filing-Appeal-Appeal-ITAT-Huge-Delay-Taxscan.jpg "No Reasonable Cause for Delay in filing Appeal: ITAT Refuses to Condone Huge Delay of 3047 based on Vague Reasons [Read Order]")
Non-Compliance of Statutory Notices due to Unavoidable Circumstances: ITAT Imposes Cost of Rs. 10,000 on Assessee for Callous and Non-Cooperation Attitude [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) while observing non-compliance of statutory notices due to unavoidable circumstances imposed cost of Rupees 10,000 on assessee for...
![Non-Compliance of Statutory Notices due to Unavoidable Circumstances: ITAT Imposes Cost of Rs. 10,000 on Assessee for Callous and Non-Cooperation Attitude [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Non-Compliance-of-Statutory-Notices-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non-Compliance of Statutory Notices due to Unavoidable Circumstances: ITAT Imposes Cost of Rs. 10,000 on Assessee for Callous and Non-Cooperation Attitude [Read Order]")
![Huge Delay of 988 Days in filing Appeal cannot be condoned for Vague Reasons: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Appeal-Delay-Vague-Reasons-Reasons-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Huge Delay of 988 Days in filing Appeal cannot be condoned for Vague Reasons: ITAT [Read Order]")
Imposes Penalty for violation of Section 269SS without Jurisdiction: ITAT quashes the Order [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)[(CIT)(A)]/NFAC and directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to cancel the penalty...
![Imposes Penalty for violation of Section 269SS without Jurisdiction: ITAT quashes the Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Penalty-Jurisdiction-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Imposes Penalty for violation of Section 269SS without Jurisdiction: ITAT quashes the Order [Read Order]")
Rules framed by Board are Statutory in Nature: ITAT notes no violation of Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), noted that there is no violation of Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules and observed that rules framed by the Board are statutory in nature. ...
![Rules framed by Board are Statutory in Nature: ITAT notes no violation of Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Rule-Nature-ITAT-violation-Rule-Income-Tax-Rules-TAXSCAN.jpg "Rules framed by Board are Statutory in Nature: ITAT notes no violation of Rule 46A of Income Tax Rules [Read Order]")