ITAT Hyderabad
Explore the latest ITAT Hyderabad judgments, orders, and appellate decisions on direct tax matters from the Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
![Rejection of Books u/s 145 Does Not Retrospectively Waive Mandatory Obligation to Furnish Audit Report u/s 44AB: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/02/500x300_2083371-itat-hyderabad-tax-audit-report-filing-section-145-rejection-section-44ab-audit.webp "Rejection of Books u/s 145 Does Not Retrospectively Waive Mandatory Obligation to Furnish Audit Report u/s 44AB: ITAT [Read Order]")
Rejection of Books u/s 145 Does Not Retrospectively Waive Mandatory Obligation to Furnish Audit Report u/s 44AB: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad, held that the rejection of books under Section 145 during assessment proceedings does not...
![AO Fails to Carry Out Adequate Verification with GST dept: ITAT Remands Alleged Bogus Purchase Addition of ₹10.51 Crore [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/02/250x150_2083383-gst-itat-alleged-bogus-taxscan.webp "AO Fails to Carry Out Adequate Verification with GST dept: ITAT Remands Alleged Bogus Purchase Addition of ₹10.51 Crore [Read Order]")
![Non-speaking, cryptic, and mechanical Income Tax Order by quasi-judicial authorities is Invalid: ITAT rules in Favour of Lions Club [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/30/250x150_2082164-lions-club-taxscan.webp "Non-speaking, cryptic, and mechanical Income Tax Order by quasi-judicial authorities is Invalid: ITAT rules in Favour of Lions Club [Read Order]")
![Concessional Tax Rate u/s 115BAA denied due to Non-Filing of Form 10-IC: ITAT direct AO to Re-consider Claim Conditionally [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/30/250x150_2082143-form-10-1c-taxscan.webp "Concessional Tax Rate u/s 115BAA denied due to Non-Filing of Form 10-IC: ITAT direct AO to Re-consider Claim Conditionally [Read Order]")
![Half-Yearly Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part VIII]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/02/250x150_2072304-half-yearly-income-tax-case-digest-itat-decisions-2025-part-8.webp "Half-Yearly Income Tax Case Digest: ITAT Decisions 2025 [Part VIII]")
Assessee could not Produce Evidence before Tribunal due to Judicial Custody: ITAT sets aside Addition of Bank Credits to Income Tax [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside additions made on account of cash deposits and bank credits for Assessment Years (AY) 2019–20 and 2020–21, noting that...
![Assessee could not Produce Evidence before Tribunal due to Judicial Custody: ITAT sets aside Addition of Bank Credits to Income Tax [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/500x300_2064490-assessee-could-not-produce-evidence-produce-evidence-evidence-produce-evidence-before-tribunal-due-taxscan.webp "Assessee could not Produce Evidence before Tribunal due to Judicial Custody: ITAT sets aside Addition of Bank Credits to Income Tax [Read Order]")
Additions u/s 153A for Unabated Years Set Aside in Absence of Incriminating Material: ITAT Remands as Assessee was under Judicial Custody [Read Order]
The ITAT Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside additions made under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for Assessment Years (AYs) 2017-18 and 2018-19,...
![Additions u/s 153A for Unabated Years Set Aside in Absence of Incriminating Material: ITAT Remands as Assessee was under Judicial Custody [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/16/500x300_2064489-judicial-custody-incriminating-material-itat-remands-taxscan.webp "Additions u/s 153A for Unabated Years Set Aside in Absence of Incriminating Material: ITAT Remands as Assessee was under Judicial Custody [Read Order]")
FTC Claim Not Denied Despite Delay as Filing of Form 67 Held Directory, Not Mandatory: ITAT [Read Order]
The Tribunal observed that the AO erred in denying credit for FTC even though the necessary form had been placed on record before the assessment order was passed. The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax...
![FTC Claim Not Denied Despite Delay as Filing of Form 67 Held Directory, Not Mandatory: ITAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/13/500x300_2063353-ftc-claim-despite-delay-filing-form-67-directory-mandatory-itat-taxscan.webp "FTC Claim Not Denied Despite Delay as Filing of Form 67 Held Directory, Not Mandatory: ITAT [Read Order]")
NHAI Grant Not Deductible from Project Cost: ITAT Upholds Deletion of ₹43.43 Crore Depreciation Disallowance [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has upheld deletion of the disallowance of Rs. 43.43 crore as depreciation and confirmed that the Rs. 38.40 crore grant received...
![NHAI Grant Not Deductible from Project Cost: ITAT Upholds Deletion of ₹43.43 Crore Depreciation Disallowance [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/09/500x300_2062044-itat-hyderabad-disallowance-taxscan.webp "NHAI Grant Not Deductible from Project Cost: ITAT Upholds Deletion of ₹43.43 Crore Depreciation Disallowance [Read Order]")
![Form 67 Filed in Time Under Amended R. 128(9): ITAT Allows ₹49.65 Lakh FTC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/04/500x300_2059130-foreign-tax-credit-form-67-filing-ftc-taxscan.webp "Form 67 Filed in Time Under Amended R. 128(9): ITAT Allows ₹49.65 Lakh FTC [Read Order]")
Taxpayer's Statement Validates Dumb Document Found During Search: ITAT Upholds Unexplained Investment Addition [Read Order]
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the addition of Rs. 25 lakhs as unexplained investment based on the document found during search and rejected the claim of...
![Taxpayers Statement Validates Dumb Document Found During Search: ITAT Upholds Unexplained Investment Addition [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/29/500x300_2056267-taxpayer-dumb-document-itat-unexplained-investment-addition-taxscan.webp "Taxpayers Statement Validates Dumb Document Found During Search: ITAT Upholds Unexplained Investment Addition [Read Order]")
Only Registered Sale Agreements Eligible of Capital Gain Exemption u/s 54: ITAT says Unregistered Agreement Lacks Evidentiary Value
The Hyderabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that purchase of property via unregistered sale agreement is not a valid transfer to claim exemption under Section 54 of the...
