![Non Compliance to Income Tax Notices Due to working in Saudi Arabia: ITAT Remands Rs.1.90 Cr Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Income-Tax-Notices-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Non Compliance to Income Tax Notices Due to working in Saudi Arabia: ITAT Remands Rs.1.90 Cr Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Non Compliance to Income Tax Notices Due to working in Saudi Arabia: ITAT Remands Rs.1.90 Cr Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Lucknow Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has remanded a case involving an addition of Rs. 1,90,90,465 back to the Assessing...
![ITAT Sets Aside Rs.1.25 Crore Penalty on UP State Bridge Corp, Orders Fresh Review Linked to Pending Quantum Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Lucknow-Penalty-on-UP-State-Bridge-Corp-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Sets Aside Rs.1.25 Crore Penalty on UP State Bridge Corp, Orders Fresh Review Linked to Pending Quantum Appeal [Read Order]")
![ITAT Dismisses Awadh Public Schools 9-Year Tax Appeal for Unjustified Delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Lucknow-Awadh-Public-School-TAXSCAN.jpeg "ITAT Dismisses Awadh Public Schools 9-Year Tax Appeal for Unjustified Delay [Read Order]")
![ITAT Sets Aside CIT Order Denying 10(23C) Registration, Cites Lack of Opportunity and No Evidence Against Educational Purpose [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Registration-ITAT-CIT-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Sets Aside CIT Order Denying 10(23C) Registration, Cites Lack of Opportunity and No Evidence Against Educational Purpose [Read Order]")
![No Clear Finding on Merits: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Decide the Matter Afresh [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/ITAT-ITAT-Lucknow-ITAT-directs-reassessment-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Clear Finding on Merits: ITAT Directs CIT(A) to Decide the Matter Afresh [Read Order]")
AO adds Rs. 64.88 lakh Expenditure u/s 14A citing Business nature: ITAT deletes addition due to Expenditure spent not exclusively for Business [Read Order]
The Lucknow Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted the disallowance of Rs. 64.88 lakh made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, citing that...
![AO adds Rs. 64.88 lakh Expenditure u/s 14A citing Business nature: ITAT deletes addition due to Expenditure spent not exclusively for Business [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/ITAT-ITAT-Lucknow-Section-14A-of-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-on-business-expenditure-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO adds Rs. 64.88 lakh Expenditure u/s 14A citing Business nature: ITAT deletes addition due to Expenditure spent not exclusively for Business [Read Order]")
ITAT Upholds Denial of Exemption u/s 54, Citing Failure to Invest in New Asset Within Specified Timeframe [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Lucknow Bench has upheld the denial of exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, to the appellant for failing to invest in a new residential...
![ITAT Upholds Denial of Exemption u/s 54, Citing Failure to Invest in New Asset Within Specified Timeframe [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Upholds-Denial-Denial-of-Exemption-Denial-of-Exemption-Section-54-Citing-Failure-to-Invest-Specified-Timeframe-Failure-to-Invest-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Upholds Denial of Exemption u/s 54, Citing Failure to Invest in New Asset Within Specified Timeframe [Read Order]")
AO not Legally Entitled to Calculates Sales on Hypothetical Basis ignoring Evidence: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Lucknow Bench, has ruled that Assessing Officer (AO) is not legally entitled to estimate sales on a hypothetical basis while ignoring documentary evidence....
![AO not Legally Entitled to Calculates Sales on Hypothetical Basis ignoring Evidence: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Lucknow-ITAT-case-on-hypothetical-sales-calculation-TAXSCAN.jpg "AO not Legally Entitled to Calculates Sales on Hypothetical Basis ignoring Evidence: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT Deletes ₹1.36Cr Addition as Travel Agent's Demonetization Deposits proved as Business Income [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Lucknow Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) overturned a tax demand related to ₹1.36 crores in cash deposits made during the demonetisation period by the...
![ITAT Deletes ₹1.36Cr Addition as Travel Agents Demonetization Deposits proved as Business Income [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Lucknow-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-Income-tax-addition-case-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Deletes ₹1.36Cr Addition as Travel Agents Demonetization Deposits proved as Business Income [Read Order]")
![ITAT Weekly Round - Up [Feb 1st-Feb 7th,2025]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-Weekly-0-Round-Up-Feb-1st-Feb-7-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Weekly Round - Up [Feb 1st-Feb 7th,2025]")
ITAT sets aside CIT(A)'s order due to Erroneous Delay Calculation, directs fresh Hearing on Condonation Request [Read Order]
The Lucknow bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] due to an erroneous calculation of the delay in filing an...
![ITAT sets aside CIT(A)s order due to Erroneous Delay Calculation, directs fresh Hearing on Condonation Request [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-2-1.jpg "ITAT sets aside CIT(A)s order due to Erroneous Delay Calculation, directs fresh Hearing on Condonation Request [Read Order]")