![ITAT quashes AO’s Rs. 57.03 Lakh Cash Deposit Addition & Penalty, Grants Fresh Hearing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-Lucknow-Income-tax-Income-Tax-News-ITAT-quashes-penalty-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT quashes AO’s Rs. 57.03 Lakh Cash Deposit Addition & Penalty, Grants Fresh Hearing [Read Order]")
ITAT quashes AO’s Rs. 57.03 Lakh Cash Deposit Addition & Penalty, Grants Fresh Hearing [Read Order]
The Lucknow Bench Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed the addition of Rs. 56.50 lakh made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the...
![Cash Deposits during Demonetisation: ITAT deletes Addition u/s 69A of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Cash-Deposits-Demonetisation-ITAT-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Cash Deposits during Demonetisation: ITAT deletes Addition u/s 69A of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Unexplained Cash Credit Addition of Rs. 1.36 Crore u/s 69A: ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Decision to Delete Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Unexplained-Cash-Credit-Deletion-of-Addition-ITAT-Upholds-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Section-69A-taxscan.jpg "Unexplained Cash Credit Addition of Rs. 1.36 Crore u/s 69A: ITAT Upholds CIT(A) Decision to Delete Addition [Read Order]")
![CIT(A) fails to exclude COVID-19 period for Calculating Limitation: ITAT directs Recalculation of 90-Day limit starting from October 3, 2021 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/COVID-19-ITAT-ITAT-directs-recalculation-taxscan.jpg "CIT(A) fails to exclude COVID-19 period for Calculating Limitation: ITAT directs Recalculation of 90-Day limit starting from October 3, 2021 [Read Order]")
![‘No person will derive any Undue Benefit by not preferring Appeal against any Assessment order passed under Act’: ITAT condones 2564-day delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/ITAT-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Assessment-order-Appeal-against-any-Assessment-order-ITAT-condones-ITAT-Lucknow-Undue-Benefit-by-not-preferring-Appeal.jpg "‘No person will derive any Undue Benefit by not preferring Appeal against any Assessment order passed under Act’: ITAT condones 2564-day delay [Read Order]")
No Additions allowed in Completed/Unabated Assessments u/s 153A or 153C without Incriminating Material found during Search: ITAT [Read Order]
The Lucknow Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) ruled that no additions were allowed in completed/unabated assessments under Section 153A or 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 without...
![No Additions allowed in Completed/Unabated Assessments u/s 153A or 153C without Incriminating Material found during Search: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/No-Additions-Completed-Unabated-Assessments-Incriminating-Material-Search-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "No Additions allowed in Completed/Unabated Assessments u/s 153A or 153C without Incriminating Material found during Search: ITAT [Read Order]")
AO Fails to Verify FMV with Valuation Officer u/s 50C(2) upon Taxpayer’s Dispute: ITAT Invalidates STCG Addition [Read Order]
The Lucknow Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) invalidated the addition of short-term capital gains ( STCG ) after the assessing officer failed to consult a valuation officer to...
![AO Fails to Verify FMV with Valuation Officer u/s 50C(2) upon Taxpayer’s Dispute: ITAT Invalidates STCG Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ITAT-ITAT-Lucknow-Income-Tax-Section-50C2-of-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Ac-Short-Term-Capital-Gains-Taxscan.jpg "AO Fails to Verify FMV with Valuation Officer u/s 50C(2) upon Taxpayer’s Dispute: ITAT Invalidates STCG Addition [Read Order]")
ITAT Criticizes Revenue's Unnecessary Appeal against CIT(A)'s Exemption u/s 26AAB despite AO already accepting claim
The Lucknow Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) criticized revenue for its unnecessary appeal against the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]’s decision regarding income tax...
Quantum of Disallowance made by AO Excessive and unreasonably High: ITAT Reduces Disallowance [Read Order]
The Lucknow Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has reduced the disallowance as the quantum of disallowance made by the Assessing Officer (AO) was excessive and unreasonably high. In...
![Quantum of Disallowance made by AO Excessive and unreasonably High: ITAT Reduces Disallowance [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Quantum-Quantum-of-Disallowance-Disallowance-AO-taxscan.jpg "Quantum of Disallowance made by AO Excessive and unreasonably High: ITAT Reduces Disallowance [Read Order]")
Capital Gain Exemption u/s 54 Cannot be Denied Based on Inadvertent and Bonafide Typographical Error: ITAT [Read Order]
The Lucknow Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the capital gain exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax could not be denied on inadvertent and bonafide typographical...
![Capital Gain Exemption u/s 54 Cannot be Denied Based on Inadvertent and Bonafide Typographical Error: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Capital-Gain-Exemption-Inadvertent-Inadvertent-and-Bonafide-Typographical-Error-Typographical-Error-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Capital Gain Exemption u/s 54 Cannot be Denied Based on Inadvertent and Bonafide Typographical Error: ITAT [Read Order]")
![No Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) in absence of TDS Deduction on Purchase of Trade items: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/TDS-Deduction-TDS-Deduction-Trade-ITAT-taxscan.png "No Disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) in absence of TDS Deduction on Purchase of Trade items: ITAT [Read Order]")