ITAT Pune
Explore the latest ITAT Pune judgments, orders, and appellate decisions on direct tax matters from the Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
![ITAT Rules Abandoned IPO Expenses as Revenue in Nature, Deletes Disallowance u/s 37(1) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Rules-ITAT-Rules-Abandoned-IPO-Expenses-IPO-Revenue-in-Nature-Deletes-Disallowance-Disallowance-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Rules Abandoned IPO Expenses as Revenue in Nature, Deletes Disallowance u/s 37(1) [Read Order]")
ITAT Rules Abandoned IPO Expenses as Revenue in Nature, Deletes Disallowance u/s 37(1) [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that expenses incurred on an abandoned Initial Public Offering (IPO) are revenue in...
![Disallowance of R&D Expense Deductions due to Missing DSIR Form 3CL: ITAT allows Full Deduction for 2016-17 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Pune-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Form-3CL-TAXSCAN.jpg "Disallowance of R&D Expense Deductions due to Missing DSIR Form 3CL: ITAT allows Full Deduction for 2016-17 [Read Order]")
![85% of Unaccounted Cash Receipts as Income: ITAT Directs AO to Tax based on Net Profit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Pune-Net-Profit-Tax-Based-on-Net-Profit-Taxscan.jpg "85% of Unaccounted Cash Receipts as Income: ITAT Directs AO to Tax based on Net Profit [Read Order]")
![Validity of Digital Evidence Without S.65B(4) Certificate: ITAT Upholds Addition of ₹4.20 Crore [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/digital-evidence.jpg "Validity of Digital Evidence Without S.65B(4) Certificate: ITAT Upholds Addition of ₹4.20 Crore [Read Order]")
![Non-Payment of Advance Tax by Senior Citizen: ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A) Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/ITAT-ITAT-Pune-Senior-Citizen-CITA-Order-Non-Payment-of-Advance-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Payment of Advance Tax by Senior Citizen: ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A) Order [Read Order]")
![ITAT quashes Penalty u/s 271B, Holds Reasonable Cause for Delay in Tax Audit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Tax-Audit-2.jpg "ITAT quashes Penalty u/s 271B, Holds Reasonable Cause for Delay in Tax Audit [Read Order]")
Deduction u/s 80IA(4) cannot be Denied for Delayed Filing of Form 10CCB Audit Report: ITAT [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal(ITAT) ruled that the deduction under section 80IA(4) of Income Tax Act,1961 cannot be denied solely due to the delayed filing of Form 10CCB, as the...
![Deduction u/s 80IA(4) cannot be Denied for Delayed Filing of Form 10CCB Audit Report: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Deduction-us-80IA4-Delayed-Filing-of-Form-10CCB-Audit-Report-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Deduction u/s 80IA(4) cannot be Denied for Delayed Filing of Form 10CCB Audit Report: ITAT [Read Order]")
CPC Assessed Income under New Regime via Form 10IE: ITAT sets aside Order as Return Filed under Old Regime, Conditions of S. 115 BAC Not Fully Met [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the assessment order which was assessed under the new regime citing that the return was filed under the new regime and conditions...
![CPC Assessed Income under New Regime via Form 10IE: ITAT sets aside Order as Return Filed under Old Regime, Conditions of S. 115 BAC Not Fully Met [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-ITAT-Pune-CPC-Assessed-Income-Income-CPC-New-Regime-via-Form-10IE-Form-10IE-taxscan.jpg "CPC Assessed Income under New Regime via Form 10IE: ITAT sets aside Order as Return Filed under Old Regime, Conditions of S. 115 BAC Not Fully Met [Read Order]")
Non-appearance due to COVID pandemic: ITAT quashes exparte order citing sufficient ground for non-compliance [Read Order]
The Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) quashed the exparte order of the Assessing Officer (AO) accepting that the COVID-19 pandemic was a reasonable and sufficient cause for the...
![Non-appearance due to COVID pandemic: ITAT quashes exparte order citing sufficient ground for non-compliance [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-COVID-pandemic-non-compliance-taxscan.jpg "Non-appearance due to COVID pandemic: ITAT quashes exparte order citing sufficient ground for non-compliance [Read Order]")
Delay in filing appeal due to pending cases in civil courts and financial struggle: ITAT condones 180 days delay [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) condoned the delay of 180 days for delay in filing appeal due to pending cases in civil courts and financial struggle of the assessee. ...
![Delay in filing appeal due to pending cases in civil courts and financial struggle: ITAT condones 180 days delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/TAT-condones-delay-ITAT-Pune-Appeal-delay-due-to-civil-court-cases-ITAT-lenient-on-delay-Delay-condonation-petition-taxscan.jpg "Delay in filing appeal due to pending cases in civil courts and financial struggle: ITAT condones 180 days delay [Read Order]")
AO Adds Gross Receipt of ₹24,89,121 u/s 144 for Commission Income Instead of Net Income: ITAT Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the matter concerning the addition of Rs. 24,89,121 as gross receipts of commission income under Section 144 of the Income Tax Act,...
![AO Adds Gross Receipt of ₹24,89,121 u/s 144 for Commission Income Instead of Net Income: ITAT Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-Pune-ITAT-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Gross-Receipt-Section-144-of-the-Income-Tax-Act-Section-144-Net-Income-taxscan.jpg "AO Adds Gross Receipt of ₹24,89,121 u/s 144 for Commission Income Instead of Net Income: ITAT Remands Matter for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
Taxpayer Mistakenly Labeled ₹21,28,710 as Commission Expenses Instead of Construction Expenses: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted an addition of Rs. 21,28,710 made by the Assessing Officer due to the taxpayer’s mistakenly misclassification of construction...
![Taxpayer Mistakenly Labeled ₹21,28,710 as Commission Expenses Instead of Construction Expenses: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Income-Tax-ITAT-ITAT-Pune-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Taxpayer Mistakenly Labeled ₹21,28,710 as Commission Expenses Instead of Construction Expenses: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]")