ITAT Pune
Explore the latest ITAT Pune judgments, orders, and appellate decisions on direct tax matters from the Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
![Additional Income Disclosed Originated Out of Seized Material: ITAT Upholds Penalty Levied u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Additional-Income-Additional-Income-Disclosed-Originated-Out-of-Seized-Material-Seized-Material-ITAT-Penalty-ITAT-Upholds-Penalty-Taxscan.jpg "Additional Income Disclosed Originated Out of Seized Material: ITAT Upholds Penalty Levied u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
Additional Income Disclosed Originated Out of Seized Material: ITAT Upholds Penalty Levied u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, on finding the additional income disclosed and...
![ITAT Upholds addition made on Mismatch in Sales Turnover Report in Audit Report and ITR [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ITAT-Upholds-addition-made-on-Mismatch-ITAT-Sales-Turnover-report-Audit-Report-ITR-Mismatch-in-Sales-Turnover-report-in-Audit-Report-and-ITR-Mismatch-in-Sales-Turnover-report-Taxscan.jpg "ITAT Upholds addition made on Mismatch in Sales Turnover Report in Audit Report and ITR [Read Order]")
![No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be Imposed, Without Assistance of Assessee in Prosecuting the Levy of Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/No-Penalty-Imposed-Assistance-of-Assessee-Assessee-Penalty-Proceedings-Proceedings-ITAT-Income-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "No Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be Imposed, Without Assistance of Assessee in Prosecuting the Levy of Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]")
![DSIR Registration is Sufficient to Claim Deduction u/s 35 (2AB) for Cases Prior to Clause (b) Rule 6(7A) Amendment: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/DSIR-Registration-is-Sufficient-to-Claim-Deduction-Cases-Prior-to-Clause-b-Rule-67A-Amendment-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "DSIR Registration is Sufficient to Claim Deduction u/s 35 (2AB) for Cases Prior to Clause (b) Rule 6(7A) Amendment: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Failure of Assessee to Substantiate Enhanced Cost of Acquisition with Cogent Evidence: ITAT upholds Disallowance of Excess Cost [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Failure-of-Assessee-Cost-of-Acquisition-Cost-of-Acquisition-with-Cogent-Evidence-ITAT-ITAT-upholds-Disallowance-of-Excess-Cost-Excess-Cost-taxscan.jpg "Failure of Assessee to Substantiate Enhanced Cost of Acquisition with Cogent Evidence: ITAT upholds Disallowance of Excess Cost [Read Order]")
Fee u/s 234E of Income Tax Act is Leviable Only for Default Committed after June 1st 2015: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench, has recently, in appeals filed before it, held that fee under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act is leviable, only for defaults committed after...
![Fee u/s 234E of Income Tax Act is Leviable Only for Default Committed after June 1st 2015: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Income-Tax-Act-is-Leviable-Income-Tax-Act-Fee-Income-Tax-Default-Committed-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Fee u/s 234E of Income Tax Act is Leviable Only for Default Committed after June 1st 2015: ITAT [Read Order]")
ITAT upholds Penalty under Section 271AAA on Failure of Assessee to Substantiate Source and Manner of Undisclosed Income [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, on failure of the assessee to substantiate the source and manner of undisclosed income, upheld the...
![ITAT upholds Penalty under Section 271AAA on Failure of Assessee to Substantiate Source and Manner of Undisclosed Income [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/ITAT-upholds-Penalty-under-Section-271AAA-Substantiate-Source-and-Manner-of-Undisclosed-Income-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT upholds Penalty under Section 271AAA on Failure of Assessee to Substantiate Source and Manner of Undisclosed Income [Read Order]")
![Undisclosed Investments in Unaccounted Stock should be Taxed Separately: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Undisclosed-Investments-Unaccounted-Stock-Investments-Taxed-Separately-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Undisclosed Investments in Unaccounted Stock should be Taxed Separately: ITAT [Read Order]")
Claim of Deduction on Freight Outward Expenses Allowable only on Submission of Actual Payment Details: ITAT [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that claim of deduction on freight outward expenses would be allowable only on submission of actual payment details. The AO...
![Claim of Deduction on Freight Outward Expenses Allowable only on Submission of Actual Payment Details: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Claim-of-Deduction-Deduction-Freight-Outward-Expenses-Expenses-Actual-Payment-Details-Submission-of-Actual-Payment-Details-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Claim of Deduction on Freight Outward Expenses Allowable only on Submission of Actual Payment Details: ITAT [Read Order]")
Default in Furnishing TDS Statement, Section 200A only applicable after 1st June 2015: ITAT [Read Order]
The Pune bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently held that the levy of a fee under Section 234E of the Income Tax Act for default in TDS statements was applicable since 1st June...
![Default in Furnishing TDS Statement, Section 200A only applicable after 1st June 2015: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Default-in-furnishing-TDS-statement-furnishing-TDS-statement-TDS-TDS-statement-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Default in Furnishing TDS Statement, Section 200A only applicable after 1st June 2015: ITAT [Read Order]")
Levy of Fees under Section 234E for Delayed Furnishing Unlawful in the Absence of Enabling Provision of Section 200A(1)(c): ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Pune Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, held that the levy of fees under Section 234E for delayed furnishing, in the absence of enabling...
![Levy of Fees under Section 234E for Delayed Furnishing Unlawful in the Absence of Enabling Provision of Section 200A(1)(c): ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Levy-of-Fees-Furnishing-Unlawful-Provision-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Levy of Fees under Section 234E for Delayed Furnishing Unlawful in the Absence of Enabling Provision of Section 200A(1)(c): ITAT [Read Order]")
No TDS u/s 194H of Income Tax Act for Expenditure claimed to have been Debited to Profit & Loss Account under head “Commission”: ITAT
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), observed that no Tax Deduction at Source (TDS) deduction under Section 194H of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for expenditure claimed to have...
