ITAT Surat
Explore the latest ITAT Surat judgments, orders, and appellate decisions on direct tax matters from the Surat bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
![CIT(A) cannot Direct Reopening u/s 150(1) if Time Limit beyond 6 years u/s 150(2) has Expired: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/CIT-Time-Limit-CITA-cannot-Direct-Reopening-taxscan.jpg "CIT(A) cannot Direct Reopening u/s 150(1) if Time Limit beyond 6 years u/s 150(2) has Expired: ITAT [Read Order]")
CIT(A) cannot Direct Reopening u/s 150(1) if Time Limit beyond 6 years u/s 150(2) has Expired: ITAT [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that CIT ( A ) could not be reopened under Section 150 of the Income Tax Act due...
![ITAT confirms Rs. 35.83 Lakh LTCG Addition, rejects Sauda Chitthi Claim for Enhanced Acquisition Cost due to Absence in Previous Financial Records [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Surat-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Long-Term-Capital-Gain-LTCG-addition-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "ITAT confirms Rs. 35.83 Lakh LTCG Addition, rejects Sauda Chitthi Claim for Enhanced Acquisition Cost due to Absence in Previous Financial Records [Read Order]")
![Credit Card payment without showing Income Source attracts S. 69A Addition: ITAT upholds Rs. 6.16L Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Credit-Card-payment-Income-Source-attracts-S-69A-Addition-ITAT-upholds-TAXSCAN.jpg "Credit Card payment without showing Income Source attracts S. 69A Addition: ITAT upholds Rs. 6.16L Addition [Read Order]")
![Non-Compliance Due to Notice for Seven AYs Issued in Short Period: ITAT Deletes 6 Penalties, Upholds Only One [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Non-Compliance-6-Penalties-Seven-AYs-ITAT-Deletes-ITAT-Surat-year-penalty-Short-Period-taxscan.jpg "Non-Compliance Due to Notice for Seven AYs Issued in Short Period: ITAT Deletes 6 Penalties, Upholds Only One [Read Order]")
![CIT(A) Fails to consider written submission and issued notice via email despite opted No in Form 35: ITAT Quashes Ex Parte order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Surat-CITA-issued-notice-via-email-despite-ITAT-Quashes-ITAT-Quashes-Ex-Parte-order-taxscan.jpg "CIT(A) Fails to consider written submission and issued notice via email despite opted No in Form 35: ITAT Quashes Ex Parte order [Read Order]")
AO Adds Rs. 2.37 Crore u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) for Valuation Discrepancy in Agricultural Land Purchase: ITAT directs to obtain DVO report [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) directed the Assessing Officer (AO) to obtain the District Valuation Officer (DVO) report, as the AO added Rs. 2.37 under section...
![AO Adds Rs. 2.37 Crore u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) for Valuation Discrepancy in Agricultural Land Purchase: ITAT directs to obtain DVO report [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/agricultural-land-valuation.jpg "AO Adds Rs. 2.37 Crore u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) for Valuation Discrepancy in Agricultural Land Purchase: ITAT directs to obtain DVO report [Read Order]")
Cash Deposits from Business Income during Demonetization cannot be treated as Unexplained Entirely: ITAT upholds 20% of Additions due to Unknown Source
The Surat Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that the cash deposits made during demonetization out of business income cannot be treated as unexplained cash deposits completely....
Non-compliance due to notice issue only via email: ITAT Remands Cash deposits during Demonetization Matter [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) remanded the matter concerning cash deposits made by the assessee during demonetization for fresh assessment considering the notice was...
![Non-compliance due to notice issue only via email: ITAT Remands Cash deposits during Demonetization Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/cash-deposit.jpeg "Non-compliance due to notice issue only via email: ITAT Remands Cash deposits during Demonetization Matter [Read Order]")
Disallowance of TDS Credit on IMP Transfer Due to assessed in wrong AY: ITAT directs to give Credit in Relevant AY [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that Tax deducted at source ( TDS ) credit on immovable property shall be allowed only for the relevant assessment year for which the...
![Disallowance of TDS Credit on IMP Transfer Due to assessed in wrong AY: ITAT directs to give Credit in Relevant AY [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Surat-IMP-Transfer-Due-TDS-credit-Taxscan.jpg "Disallowance of TDS Credit on IMP Transfer Due to assessed in wrong AY: ITAT directs to give Credit in Relevant AY [Read Order]")
Inapplicability of 12A(1)(ba) Amendment for 2017-18 AY: ITAT grants Temple Trust Exemptions u/s 11&12 [Read Order]
The Surat bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), in the case of Shri Siddhanath Mahadev Temple, held that the temple trust is entitled to tax exemptions under Sections 11 and 12 of the...
![Inapplicability of 12A(1)(ba) Amendment for 2017-18 AY: ITAT grants Temple Trust Exemptions u/s 11&12 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Inapplicability-12A1ba-Amendment-2017-18-AY-ITAT-Temple-Trust-Exemptions-taxscan.jpg "Inapplicability of 12A(1)(ba) Amendment for 2017-18 AY: ITAT grants Temple Trust Exemptions u/s 11&12 [Read Order]")
Natural Justice Violated by unfair Deadline: ITAT Remands ₹1.3 Cr Addition case u/s 69C to AO [Read Order]
The Surat bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) in the case of supersonic impex held that a deadline of three days for submission of all relevant records of the assessee’s accounts was...
![Natural Justice Violated by unfair Deadline: ITAT Remands ₹1.3 Cr Addition case u/s 69C to AO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Surat-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Section-250-of-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Natural Justice Violated by unfair Deadline: ITAT Remands ₹1.3 Cr Addition case u/s 69C to AO [Read Order]")
ITAT Rejects Cooperative Bank's Bad Debt Reserve Claim u/s 36(1)(viia), Allows FD Loss as Business Expense [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), in a recent ruling, rejected a cooperative bank's claim of bank debt reserves under Section 36(1)(viia) of the Income Tax Act 1961,...
![ITAT Rejects Cooperative Banks Bad Debt Reserve Claim u/s 36(1)(viia), Allows FD Loss as Business Expense [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Surat-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Section-361viia-of-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Rejects Cooperative Banks Bad Debt Reserve Claim u/s 36(1)(viia), Allows FD Loss as Business Expense [Read Order]")