ITAT
Stay updated with the latest ITAT judgments, orders, and appellate rulings impacting income tax matters in India.
![Setback to NDTV: ITAT dismisses Deduction Claim towards Business Expenditure [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/NDTV-ITAT-Deduction-Business-Expenditure-taxscan.jpg "Setback to NDTV: ITAT dismisses Deduction Claim towards Business Expenditure [Read Order]")
Setback to NDTV: ITAT dismisses Deduction Claim towards Business Expenditure [Read Order]
In a major setback to NDTV, the Delhi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has confirmed the orders of the income tax department...
![Original Cost and Period of Acquisition of Property by previous owner is relevant for Claim of Capital Gain: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/cost-acquisition-of-property-claim-capital-gain-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "Original Cost and Period of Acquisition of Property by previous owner is relevant for Claim of Capital Gain: ITAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT dismisses Appeal stating delay of 1070 days on lack of prima facie Bonafideness [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/ITAT-appeal-bonafideness-taxscan.jpeg "ITAT dismisses Appeal stating delay of 1070 days on lack of prima facie Bonafideness [Read Order]")
![Supporting Evidence mandatory for claim TDS Credit in absence of TDS Certificate: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/evidence-claim-TDS-Credit-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Supporting Evidence mandatory for claim TDS Credit in absence of TDS Certificate: ITAT [Read Order]")
![True Copies submitted before Income Tax Authorities do not have Evidentiary Value: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Evidentiary-Value-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "True Copies submitted before Income Tax Authorities do not have Evidentiary Value: ITAT [Read Order]")
Addition as Unexplained Investment in difference in Value on Purchase of Property without considering Co-owner is not valid: ITAT [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ruled that the addition as unexplained investment in difference in value on the purchase of property without considering co-owner is not...
![Addition as Unexplained Investment in difference in Value on Purchase of Property without considering Co-owner is not valid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/investment-purchase-of-property-co-owner-ITAT-taxscan-1.jpg "Addition as Unexplained Investment in difference in Value on Purchase of Property without considering Co-owner is not valid: ITAT [Read Order]")
No Penalty u/s 271C when delay in Filing Appeal occurred due to Ambiguity on direction contained in Statutory Document: ITAT [Read Order]
No Penalty u/s 271C when delay in filing appeal occurred due to ambiguity on direction contained in statutory document, so was held by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), New Delhi. The...
![No Penalty u/s 271C when delay in Filing Appeal occurred due to Ambiguity on direction contained in Statutory Document: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Penalty-appeal-statutory-document-ITAT-taxscan.jpeg "No Penalty u/s 271C when delay in Filing Appeal occurred due to Ambiguity on direction contained in Statutory Document: ITAT [Read Order]")
Notice u/s 274 Fails to specify Concealment or Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars of Income: ITAT deletes Penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Delhi Bench presided by Mr. N.K. Billaiya, Accountant Member, and Mr. N.K. Choudhry, Judicial Member has deleted the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c)...
![Notice u/s 274 Fails to specify Concealment or Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars of Income: ITAT deletes Penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Notice-Concealment-Income-ITAT-Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Notice u/s 274 Fails to specify Concealment or Furnishing Inaccurate Particulars of Income: ITAT deletes Penalty imposed u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
MAT provisions u/s 115JB are applicable only to Domestic Companies and not to Foreign Companies: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench has held that Minimum Alternate Tax (MAT) provisions under section 115JB are applicable only to domestic companies and not to foreign companies....
![MAT provisions u/s 115JB are applicable only to Domestic Companies and not to Foreign Companies: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/MAT-provisions-Domestic-Companies-Foreign-Companies-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "MAT provisions u/s 115JB are applicable only to Domestic Companies and not to Foreign Companies: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Law Protects Only Those Who are Vigilant: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 2985 Days [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/ITAT-Condone-Delay-taxscan.jpeg "Law Protects Only Those Who are Vigilant: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 2985 Days [Read Order]")
![Tamil Actor Vijayakant gets Partial Relief from ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Tamil-Actor-Vijayakant-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Tamil Actor Vijayakant gets Partial Relief from ITAT [Read Order]")
Appeal against ITAT order lies before HC in whose Jurisdiction AO Situates: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]
The division bench of the Supreme Court has held that appeals against Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) order lies before the High Court in whose jurisdiction the Assessing Officer who passes the...
![Appeal against ITAT order lies before HC in whose Jurisdiction AO Situates: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Appeal-ITAT-Jurisdiction-AO-Supreme-Court-taxscan.jpeg "Appeal against ITAT order lies before HC in whose Jurisdiction AO Situates: Supreme Court [Read Judgment]")