Top
Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
undefined

ITAT

Stay updated with the latest ITAT judgments, orders, and appellate rulings impacting income tax matters in India.

    No Separate Rent provided by Co-tenants: ITAT Grants relief to Landlord based on Tenant’s Bank Records [Read Order]

    The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has granted relief to a landlord after holding that the Assessing Officer (AO) wrongly assumed that separate rent was being paid by two...

    No Separate Rent provided by Co-tenants: ITAT Grants relief to Landlord based on Tenant’s Bank Records [Read Order]
    Navasree A.M

    Taxpayer cannot be Penalised for Mistake of Previous Tax Consultant: ITAT Grants Relief [Read Order}

    The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Rajkot has held that a taxpayer should not be penalised for the mistake of a previous tax consultant. The tribunal, condoned a 104-day delay...

    Taxpayer cannot be Penalised for Mistake of Previous Tax Consultant: ITAT Grants Relief [Read Order}
    Navasree A.M

    Rebate u/s 87A allowable to STCG and LTCG Taxed under New Regime, Not Applicable on VDA Transfers: ITAT [Read Order]

    The Indore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) has held that rebate under Section 87A is allowable against tax payable on Short-Term Capital Gains ( STCG ) under Section 111A and...

    Rebate u/s 87A allowable to STCG and LTCG Taxed under New Regime, Not Applicable on VDA Transfers: ITAT [Read Order]
    Navasree A.M

    Deeming Provision of S. 69A applies only when ‘Money Found’ with Taxpayer and Not Explained: ITAT [Read Order]

    The deeming provision under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 applies only when “money” is found with the assessee and the assessee fails to explain its nature and source, ruled the Income...

    Deeming Provision of S. 69A applies only when ‘Money Found’ with Taxpayer and Not Explained: ITAT [Read Order]
    Navasree A.M

    ESOP Cost allowable as Business Expenditure u/s 37: ITAT allows Yatra’s ₹93L Claim Despite same Issue Pending before SC [Read Order]

    The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Delhi Bench allowed that ESOP (Employee Stock Option Plan) expenditure to Yatra as business deduction under Section37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961...

    ESOP Cost allowable as Business Expenditure u/s 37: ITAT allows Yatra’s ₹93L Claim Despite same Issue Pending before SC [Read Order]
    Navasree A.M

    ITAT Weekly Round-up

    This weekly round-up encapsulates the key stories related to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) reported at Taxscan during the previous week, from January 12, 2025 to January 17, 2025. ...

    ITAT Weekly Round-up
    Mansi Yadav

    Penalty Invalid as Notice did not specify sub-clause of S.270: ITAT Rules in Favour of Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd [Read Order]

    The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside the penalty against Bajaj Housing Finance, holding that such a penalty will be invalid as the notice for the same did not specify a sub-clause...

    Penalty Invalid as Notice did not specify sub-clause of S.270: ITAT Rules in Favour of Bajaj Housing Finance Ltd [Read Order]
    Raheel Midhat

    Quick Links

    Know More

    © 2025 Taxscan. All rights reserved.

    Powered by  Blink CMS

    All Rights Reserved. Copyright @2019
    Powered By Hocalwire
    X