![Customs Must Decide Importer’s Plea for Provisional Release Despite Ongoing SIIB Probe: Madras HC Directs Time-Bound Consideration [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/28/2127454-madras-high-court-importers-plea-siib-time-bound-consideration-provisional-release-siib-investigation-taxscan.webp "Customs Must Decide Importer’s Plea for Provisional Release Despite Ongoing SIIB Probe: Madras HC Directs Time-Bound Consideration [Read Order]")
Customs Must Decide Importer’s Plea for Provisional Release Despite Ongoing SIIB Probe: Madras HC Directs Time-Bound Consideration [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court held that Customs authorities must consider an importer’s request for provisional release of goods within...
![SCN u/s 124 of Customs Act Mandatory even if Notice allegedly Waived: Madras HC Quashes Customs Confiscation Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/02/28/2127443-madras-high-court-customs-act-customs-confiscation-order-madras-high-court-customs-judgment-taxscan.webp "SCN u/s 124 of Customs Act Mandatory even if Notice allegedly Waived: Madras HC Quashes Customs Confiscation Order [Read Order]")
![Impugned Communication restricting F-Card Holder’s Practice has been Issued without Authority under Law: Madras HC Sets Aside Customs Restriction [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/31/2122742-impugned-communication-restricting-f-card-holders-practice-been-issued-taxscan.webp "Impugned Communication restricting F-Card Holder’s Practice has been Issued without Authority under Law: Madras HC Sets Aside Customs Restriction [Read Order]")
![Madras HC Flags Decade‑Long Delay in Customs Assessment: Directs Finalisation of TVS Motor Imports Within Six Weeks [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/16/2120087-madras-hc-flags-decade-long-delay-customs-assessment-directs-finalisation-tvs-motor-imports-within-six-weeks-taxscan.webp "Madras HC Flags Decade‑Long Delay in Customs Assessment: Directs Finalisation of TVS Motor Imports Within Six Weeks [Read Order]")
![Madras HC directs DRI to Decide Whether ‘Vital Wheat Gluten’ is covered by DFIA for Wheat Flour [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2026/01/06/2117279-madras-hc-dri-decide-vital-wheat-gluten-covered-dfia-wheat-flour-taxscan.webp "Madras HC directs DRI to Decide Whether ‘Vital Wheat Gluten’ is covered by DFIA for Wheat Flour [Read Order]")
Statutory Variation Clause Applicable: Madras HC Upholds Arbitral Awards Granting Full GST Reimbursement and Sets Aside Conflicting Award [Read Order]
The Madras High Court dismissed the petitions filed by the Integral Coach Factory (ICF) and simultaneously set aside a solitary conflicting arbitral award, all revolving around the applicability of ...
![Statutory Variation Clause Applicable: Madras HC Upholds Arbitral Awards Granting Full GST Reimbursement and Sets Aside Conflicting Award [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/10/28/2100325-arbitral-award-taxscan.webp "Statutory Variation Clause Applicable: Madras HC Upholds Arbitral Awards Granting Full GST Reimbursement and Sets Aside Conflicting Award [Read Order]")
Classification of Goods: Madras HC Directs CESTAT to Consider Precedents Cited by BenQ India While Entertaining Appeal [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has directed the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) to take into account judicial precedents mentioned by BenQ India in relation to the...
![Classification of Goods: Madras HC Directs CESTAT to Consider Precedents Cited by BenQ India While Entertaining Appeal [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/18/2078043-classification-goods-taxscan.webp "Classification of Goods: Madras HC Directs CESTAT to Consider Precedents Cited by BenQ India While Entertaining Appeal [Read Order]")
Without Acknowledgement or Returned Cover from Customs Dept, Assessee’s Statement on Date of Receipt of Order Prevails: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has ruled that in the absence of acknowledgement or returned cover evidencing service of the customs adjudication order by the customs dept, the assessee’s statement regarding...
![Without Acknowledgement or Returned Cover from Customs Dept, Assessee’s Statement on Date of Receipt of Order Prevails: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/18/2078046-without-acknowledgement-or-returned-cover-from-customs-dept-taxscan.webp "Without Acknowledgement or Returned Cover from Customs Dept, Assessee’s Statement on Date of Receipt of Order Prevails: Madras HC [Read Order]")
No Notice Issued Prior to Passing Customs Duty Drawback Recovery Order: Madras HC Orders to Consider afresh [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has quashed a Customs Duty Drawback recovery order issued holding that no prior notice was served on the petitioner before passing the order. The writ petition was filed...
![No Notice Issued Prior to Passing Customs Duty Drawback Recovery Order: Madras HC Orders to Consider afresh [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/14/2076622-customs-duty-drawback-taxscan.webp "No Notice Issued Prior to Passing Customs Duty Drawback Recovery Order: Madras HC Orders to Consider afresh [Read Order]")
Gold bars Weighing More than 1kg is Prohibited u/s 2(33) of Customs Act: Madras HC rules No Redemption allowed [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has ruled that gold bars weighing more than 1 kilogram are prohibited goods under Section 2(33) of the Customs Act, 1962, denying the petitioners' request for redemption of...
![Gold bars Weighing More than 1kg is Prohibited u/s 2(33) of Customs Act: Madras HC rules No Redemption allowed [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/06/2073503-gold-bars-gold-bars-weighing-section-233-of-customs-act-taxscan.webp "Gold bars Weighing More than 1kg is Prohibited u/s 2(33) of Customs Act: Madras HC rules No Redemption allowed [Read Order]")
Customs Duty Drawback Recovery u/r 16A initiated after more than 3 years: Madras HC orders to Reconsider [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has directed the customs authorities to reconsider a duty drawback recovery order, which was issued after more than 3 years holding that the adjudication was conducted in...
![Customs Duty Drawback Recovery u/r 16A initiated after more than 3 years: Madras HC orders to Reconsider [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/08/06/2073502-customs-duty-drawback-taxscan.webp "Customs Duty Drawback Recovery u/r 16A initiated after more than 3 years: Madras HC orders to Reconsider [Read Order]")
Customs Revisional Order Based on Another’s Case Without Assessing Taxpayer’s Defense: Madras HC Remands Matter [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court held that a customs revisional order is invalid if it is passed solely based on findings in another person’s case without properly considering the...
![Customs Revisional Order Based on Another’s Case Without Assessing Taxpayer’s Defense: Madras HC Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/2068151-revision-order-taxscan.webp "Customs Revisional Order Based on Another’s Case Without Assessing Taxpayer’s Defense: Madras HC Remands Matter [Read Order]")