![Lease Hold Rights Existing in Favor of Corporate Debtor Cannot be Terminated During Moratorium Period u/s 14 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Lease-hold-rights-Corporate-debtor-rights-NCLAT-ruling-taxscan.jpg "Lease Hold Rights Existing in Favor of Corporate Debtor Cannot be Terminated During Moratorium Period u/s 14 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Lease Hold Rights Existing in Favor of Corporate Debtor Cannot be Terminated During Moratorium Period u/s 14 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) New Delhi has ruled that lease hold rights existing in favour of corporate debtor cannot be...
![Approved Resolution Plan Cannot be Reopened based on Belatedly agitated Claims: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Approved-Resolution-Plan-Reopened-Belatedly-Claims-NCLAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Approved Resolution Plan Cannot be Reopened based on Belatedly agitated Claims: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Issuance of Demand Notice to Personal Guarantor u/r 7 of Personal Guarantors Rules not Amounts to Invocation of Guarantee: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Issuance-of-Demand-Notice-Demand-Notice-Demand-Notice-to-Personal-Guarantor-Personal-Guarantor-Personal-Guarantors-Rules-NCLAT-taxscan.jpg "Issuance of Demand Notice to Personal Guarantor u/r 7 of Personal Guarantors Rules not Amounts to Invocation of Guarantee: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Rejection of Resolution Plan by Suspended Director cannot be Interfered in Absence of Expression of Interest: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Resolution-Plan.jpg "Rejection of Resolution Plan by Suspended Director cannot be Interfered in Absence of Expression of Interest: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Electricity is Essential Supply, cannot Disconnected during CIRP Period under IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Electricity-Essential-Supply-Disconnected-CIRP-Period-IBC-NCLAT-taxscan.jpg "Electricity is Essential Supply, cannot Disconnected during CIRP Period under IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Relief under IBC 60(5) on Liquidator Rejection of Claims Unavailable when Remedy under IBC 42 is not Used: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that relief under section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) cannot be claimed against rejection of claims by the...
![Relief under IBC 60(5) on Liquidator Rejection of Claims Unavailable when Remedy under IBC 42 is not Used: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-Insolvency-and-Bankruptcy-Code-IBC-Section-605-of-IBC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief under IBC 60(5) on Liquidator Rejection of Claims Unavailable when Remedy under IBC 42 is not Used: NCLAT [Read Order]")
![Lone Homebuyer has no right to Challenge Approval of Resolution Plan: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/NCLAT-NCLAT-New-Delhi-NCLAT-case-on-lone-homebuyer-rights-Taxscan.jpg "Lone Homebuyer has no right to Challenge Approval of Resolution Plan: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) New Delhi has ruled that a financial creditor's ability to seek redress under Section 7 of the law is not in any way restricted by a dispute that...
![Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Pending-Arbitration-Prohibit-Financial-Creditors-Financial-Creditors-dispute-even-Pending-Arbitration-avail-remedy-section-7-of-IBC-IBC-taxscan.jpg "Any dispute even Pending Arbitration does not Prohibit Financial Creditors to avail remedy u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]
In a recent ruling , the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that delay in filing an appeal beyond 15 days as per section 61(2) proviso of the Insolvency...
![Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Appeal-Delayed-Condonable-as-Per-Proviso-Per-Proviso-Section-612-of-IBC-IBC-NCLAT-NCLAT-refuses-NCLAT-refuses-to-Condone-Kotak-Mahindra-taxscan.jpg "Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]")
![NCLAT Orders Meta to Pay Penalty; Stays Ban on WhatsApps Data-Sharing Policy [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/NCLAT-NCLAT-Orders-Meta-to-Pay-Penalty-Penalty-Ban-on-WhatsApps-WhatsApps-WhatsApps-Data-Sharing-Policy-Data-Sharing-Policy-taxscan.jpg "NCLAT Orders Meta to Pay Penalty; Stays Ban on WhatsApps Data-Sharing Policy [Read Order]")
Orders Obtained through Fraud may be Recalled by Adjudicating Authority u/r 11 of the NCLT Rules: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) has observed that where the adjudicating authority has been made to rely on distorted facts which the adjudicating authority became aware of...
![Orders Obtained through Fraud may be Recalled by Adjudicating Authority u/r 11 of the NCLT Rules: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/NCLAT-Rule-11-of-NCLT-Orders-Obtained-through-Fraud-NCLAT-on-fraudulent-orders-recall-TAXSCAN.jpg "Orders Obtained through Fraud may be Recalled by Adjudicating Authority u/r 11 of the NCLT Rules: NCLAT [Read Order]")