![Principle of Mutuality not Applicable on Income Earned by Clubs through its Assets and Resources, from Persons who are not Members, Income Tax Applicable: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Principle-Mutuality-Income-Clubs-Assets-Persons-Income-Tax-Supreme-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Principle of Mutuality not Applicable on Income Earned by Clubs through its Assets and Resources, from Persons who are not Members, Income Tax Applicable: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]")
Principle of Mutuality not Applicable on Income Earned by Clubs through its Assets and Resources, from Persons who are not Members, Income Tax Applicable: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]
In a major decision the Supreme Court has ruled that the principle of mutuality is not applicable on income earned by clubs through its assets and...
![Credit Note Issued by Manufacturer to Dealer related to Replacement of Defective Part is a Valuable Consideration, Tata Motors Liable to Pay Sales Tax: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/CREDIT1.jpg "Credit Note Issued by Manufacturer to Dealer related to Replacement of Defective Part is a Valuable Consideration, Tata Motors Liable to Pay Sales Tax: Supreme Court [Read Judgement]")
Bail Condition to Deposit of 70 Lakhs for wrongful availment of ITC based on FIR is invalid, no legal liability proven on GST Liability: Supreme Court [Read Order]
A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court has recently struck down the condition to deposit 70 Lakh Rupees, in bail granted to an accused allegedly involved in a GST scam of around 7 Crore Rupees. ...
![Bail Condition to Deposit of 70 Lakhs for wrongful availment of ITC based on FIR is invalid, no legal liability proven on GST Liability: Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Bail-Deposit-ITC-FIR-GST-Liability-Supreme-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Bail Condition to Deposit of 70 Lakhs for wrongful availment of ITC based on FIR is invalid, no legal liability proven on GST Liability: Supreme Court [Read Order]")
Feminist Judgement from Supreme Court: “Individual” u/s 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act includes both Men and Women,Excluding Married Women is “Discriminatory”
In a ruling striking down a part of section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961, the Supreme Court has held that denial of income tax exemption for “married Sikkimees women” is discriminatory as the...
Repeal of S. 144B(9) vide Finance Act, 2022: Supreme Court stays High Court Order declaring Assessment Order Non-Est [Read Order]
The Supreme Court, in view of repeal of section 144B(9) of the Finance Act, 2022, has stayed an assessment order declared as non-est by the High Court. The petitioner, National Faceless Assessment...
![Repeal of S. 144B(9) vide Finance Act, 2022: Supreme Court stays High Court Order declaring Assessment Order Non-Est [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Repeal-Finance-Act-Supreme-Court-High-Court-Order-Assessment-Order-Non-Est-Taxscan.jpeg "Repeal of S. 144B(9) vide Finance Act, 2022: Supreme Court stays High Court Order declaring Assessment Order Non-Est [Read Order]")
Supreme Court upholds BCI’s decision of Cancellation of Enrolment of Advocate suppressing Criminal Case against him during Enrolment [Read Judgment]
The Apex Court has upheld the decision of Bar Council of India’s (BCI’s) Decision of Cancellation of enrolment of advocate suppressing criminal Case against him during enrolment. At the time when...
![Supreme Court denies ITC for availing Outdoor Catering Services to Employees [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Toyota-Supreme-Court-ITC-Outdoor-Catering-Service-catering-Taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court denies ITC for availing Outdoor Catering Services to Employees [Read Order]")
Advocate losing case on merits could not be termed as Deficiency in Service under the Consumer Protection Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]
The Supreme Court held that the advocate losing the case on merits could not be termed as Deficiency in Service under the Consumer Protection Act. The petitioner, Nandlal Lohariya filed three...
