Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Feminist Judgement from Supreme Court: “Individual” u/s 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act includes both Men and Women,Excluding Married Women is “Discriminatory”
In a ruling striking down a part of section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961, the Supreme Court has held that denial of income tax exemption for...
![Repeal of S. 144B(9) vide Finance Act, 2022: Supreme Court stays High Court Order declaring Assessment Order Non-Est [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Repeal-Finance-Act-Supreme-Court-High-Court-Order-Assessment-Order-Non-Est-Taxscan.jpeg "Repeal of S. 144B(9) vide Finance Act, 2022: Supreme Court stays High Court Order declaring Assessment Order Non-Est [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court denies ITC for availing Outdoor Catering Services to Employees [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Toyota-Supreme-Court-ITC-Outdoor-Catering-Service-catering-Taxscan.jpg "Supreme Court denies ITC for availing Outdoor Catering Services to Employees [Read Order]")
Advocate losing case on merits could not be termed as Deficiency in Service under the Consumer Protection Act: Supreme Court [Read Order]
The Supreme Court held that the advocate losing the case on merits could not be termed as Deficiency in Service under the Consumer Protection Act. The petitioner, Nandlal Lohariya filed three...
