![Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [Feb 15th to Feb 21st,2025]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Supreme-court-High-court-Judgments-Supreme-court-tax-judgments-high-court-case-updates-TAXSCAN.jpg "Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [Feb 15th to Feb 21st,2025]")
Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [Feb 15th to Feb 21st,2025]
This weekly round-up analytically summarizes the key stories related to the Supreme Court and High Court reported at Taxscan.in during the previous...
![Cenvat Credit of Service Tax Refund Rejected in GST Regime: Madras HC directs to allow Recredit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Cenvat-Credit-Service-Tax-Refund-Rejected-GST-Regime-Madras-HC-taxscan.jpg "Cenvat Credit of Service Tax Refund Rejected in GST Regime: Madras HC directs to allow Recredit [Read Order]")
![GST Authorities cannot Add New Defects in Orders beyond those Specified in SCNs: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/GST-GST-Authorities-Madras-High-Court-Show-cause-notice-Madras-high-court-on-GST-order-defects-taxscan.jpg "GST Authorities cannot Add New Defects in Orders beyond those Specified in SCNs: Madras HC [Read Order]")
![Unjustified Delay by Customs Dept. in considering Case De Novo: Madras HC directs Expedited Refund of Redemption Fine and Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Madras-HC-Madras-High-Court-Customs-Department-redemption-fine-and-penalty-TAXSCAN.jpeg "Unjustified Delay by Customs Dept. in considering Case De Novo: Madras HC directs Expedited Refund of Redemption Fine and Penalty [Read Order]")
Cross Examination by Excise Dept required only for Confirmation of Demand based Solely on Witness Statements: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court clarified that cross-examination in quasi-judicial proceedings is necessary only when witness statements serve as the exclusive basis for confirming excise...
Mere Mentioning of Wrong VAT Provision does not invalidate Order if Authority has Proper Jurisdiction: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court ruled that mere mentioning of a wrong value-added tax ( VAT ) Provision or non-mentioning of a provision does not invalidate an order if the court or...
![Mere Mentioning of Wrong VAT Provision does not invalidate Order if Authority has Proper Jurisdiction: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/VAT-Madras-High-Court-Madras-HC-value-added-tax-VAT-order-TAXSCAN.jpg "Mere Mentioning of Wrong VAT Provision does not invalidate Order if Authority has Proper Jurisdiction: Madras HC [Read Order]")
GST Recovery and Hearing Notices ignored: Madras HC orders 25% Pre-Deposit from Cash Ledger for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]
In a matter of ignorance of the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) recovery notices and the hearing notices, the Madras High Court has ordered the pre-deposit of 25% from the Electronic Cash Ledger ( ECL...
![GST Recovery and Hearing Notices ignored: Madras HC orders 25% Pre-Deposit from Cash Ledger for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/GST-Goods-and-Services-Tax-pre-deposit-Madras-HC-Electronic-Cash-Ledger-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Recovery and Hearing Notices ignored: Madras HC orders 25% Pre-Deposit from Cash Ledger for Fresh Consideration [Read Order]")
Pre-GST Dues can be Cleared in Monthly Instalments: Madras HC rules Partly in Favour of Manufacturing Company in Loss [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has ruled in favour of a manufacturing company facing financial difficulties, allowing it to clear its pre-GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) dues of Rs. 1.2 crores through monthly...
![Pre-GST Dues can be Cleared in Monthly Instalments: Madras HC rules Partly in Favour of Manufacturing Company in Loss [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-GST-Pre-GST-Dues-Goods-and-Services-Tax-Monthly-instalments-for-tax-dues-Monthly-Instalments-taxscan.jpg "Pre-GST Dues can be Cleared in Monthly Instalments: Madras HC rules Partly in Favour of Manufacturing Company in Loss [Read Order]")
'Powder Coating' for Yokes, Links, and Tubes Constitutes Works Contract, Liable to VAT: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has ruled that the work involving 'powder coating' of yokes, links, and tubes constitutes a works contract and is therefore liable for Value Added Tax ( VAT ). The Commercial...
![Powder Coating for Yokes, Links, and Tubes Constitutes Works Contract, Liable to VAT: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Madras-High-Court-Value-Added-Tax-Powder-coating-tubes-TAXSCAN.jpg "Powder Coating for Yokes, Links, and Tubes Constitutes Works Contract, Liable to VAT: Madras HC [Read Order]")
VAT ITC Denied on Zero Rated Sales: Madras HC Remits to Issue Fresh Order quashing Reassessment Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has quashed a reassessment order and remitted the matter back for fresh consideration in a case involving denial of Input Tax Credit (ITC) on zero-rated sales under the Tamil...
Single Satisfaction Note Sufficient u/s 153C When Same Assessing Officer Handles Both Searched Person and Other Party: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court ruled that a single satisfaction note was sufficient under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961, when the same assessing officer handles both searched...
![Single Satisfaction Note Sufficient u/s 153C When Same Assessing Officer Handles Both Searched Person and Other Party: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Income-Tax-Madras-High-Court-Single-Satisfaction-Note-TAXSCAN.jpg "Single Satisfaction Note Sufficient u/s 153C When Same Assessing Officer Handles Both Searched Person and Other Party: Madras HC [Read Order]")