Issue of Notice on Secondary Email Address when primary address provided: Bombay HC quashes Re-Assessment Notice [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court (HC) in its recent judgment quashed the re-assessment notice secondary email address when the primary address was provided. ...
![Income Tax Departments Delay to comply with Assessees Refund Request: Bombay HC Directs to Issue Additional Refund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Income-Tax-Department-Delay-Assessee-Refund-Bombay-High-Court-Additional-Refund-Taxscan.jpg "Income Tax Departments Delay to comply with Assessees Refund Request: Bombay HC Directs to Issue Additional Refund [Read Order]")
![Failure to Get Sanction u/s 151(ii) from PCIT for Reopening of Assessment beyond 3 years will Invalidate Reassessment Proceedings: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Sanction-PCIT-Reopening-of-Assessment-Assessment-Reassessment-Proceedings-Bombay-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Failure to Get Sanction u/s 151(ii) from PCIT for Reopening of Assessment beyond 3 years will Invalidate Reassessment Proceedings: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
![Disputed Income Tax Calculation based on FAQ from CBDT Circular invalid if Specific Provision exists in Act: Bombay HC remands matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/DIncome-Tax-Calculation-FAQ-CBDT-Circular-Bombay-HC-TAXSCAN.jpg "Disputed Income Tax Calculation based on FAQ from CBDT Circular invalid if Specific Provision exists in Act: Bombay HC remands matter [Read Order]")
![Mere Change of Opinion does not provide Jurisdiction to Re-Open Assessment: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Mere-Change-of-Opinion-Jurisdiction-Re-Open-Assessment-Bombay-HC-Taxscan.jpg "Mere Change of Opinion does not provide Jurisdiction to Re-Open Assessment: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
No Satisfaction of Jurisdictional conditions by AO: Bombay HC quashes Re-Assessment Notice [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court quashed re assessment notice on the ground that no satisfaction of jurisdictional conditions by the Assessing Officer (AO). The petitioner, Standard Industries Limited, is...
![No Satisfaction of Jurisdictional conditions by AO: Bombay HC quashes Re-Assessment Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Bombay-High-Court-Re-Assessment-Notice-Bombay-HC-quashes-Re-Assessment-Notice-Jurisdictional-conditions-AO-Assessing-Officer-Re-Assessment-Taxscan.jpg "No Satisfaction of Jurisdictional conditions by AO: Bombay HC quashes Re-Assessment Notice [Read Order]")
![Re-Opening Assessment based on Mere Change of Opinion is not Allowable: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Re-Opening-Assessment-Bombay-High-Court-Opinion-Assessment-Taxscan.jpg "Re-Opening Assessment based on Mere Change of Opinion is not Allowable: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Failure to satisfy conditions u/s 147 and Non- Application of mind: Bombay HC quashes Reassessment notice [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court quashed the reassessment notice on the ground of failure to satisfy conditions under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and non-application of mind. The Petitioner,...
![Failure to satisfy conditions u/s 147 and Non- Application of mind: Bombay HC quashes Reassessment notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Non-Application-Bombay-High-Court-Reassessment-notice-Reassessment-Taxscan.jpg "Failure to satisfy conditions u/s 147 and Non- Application of mind: Bombay HC quashes Reassessment notice [Read Order]")
![Bombay HC orders re consideration on classification of ACP under CETA [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Bombay-High-Court-ACP-CETA-Central-Excise-Tariff-Act-Excise-Tariff-taxscan-.jpg "Bombay HC orders re consideration on classification of ACP under CETA [Read Order]")
![Re-Assessment Against Non-Existent Company Not Valid despite Active PAN: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Re-Assessment-Non-Existent-Company-PAN-Bombay-HC-Taxscan.jpg "Re-Assessment Against Non-Existent Company Not Valid despite Active PAN: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
“Feigning Ignorance of Law by Authorities Only Increases Burden of Courts”: Bombay HC Quashes Re-Assessment [Read Order]
Quashing a re-assessment notice the Bombay High Court observed that “Feigning Ignorance of Law by Authorities only increases Burden of Courts”. The petitioner in the writ petition is Deepak Marda....
![“Feigning Ignorance of Law by Authorities Only Increases Burden of Courts”: Bombay HC Quashes Re-Assessment [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Ignorance-of-Law-Authorities-Courts-Bombay-High-Court-Re-Assessment-Taxscan.jpg "“Feigning Ignorance of Law by Authorities Only Increases Burden of Courts”: Bombay HC Quashes Re-Assessment [Read Order]")
No Service Tax on Telecom Towers Erected at Site and Affixed to Earth: Bombay HC Quashes Demand of Ineligible Cenvat Credit against Tata Teleservices [Read Order]
In a significant case, the Bombay High court quashed the demand of ineligible Cenvat credit against Tata teleservices and held that no service tax on telecom towers erected at the site and affixed to...
![No Service Tax on Telecom Towers Erected at Site and Affixed to Earth: Bombay HC Quashes Demand of Ineligible Cenvat Credit against Tata Teleservices [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Service-Tax-Telecom-Towers-Bombay-High-Court-Demand-Ineligible-Cenvat-Credit-Cenvat-Credit-Tata-Teleservices-Taxscan.jpg "No Service Tax on Telecom Towers Erected at Site and Affixed to Earth: Bombay HC Quashes Demand of Ineligible Cenvat Credit against Tata Teleservices [Read Order]")