![50% Disputed GST Demand deposited in Wrong Head: Madras HC sets aside Matter on 10% Pre-deposit out of remaining 50% [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Disputed-GST-Demand-deposited-in-Wrong-Head-Madras-HC-Matter-Pre-deposit-taxscan.jpg "50% Disputed GST Demand deposited in Wrong Head: Madras HC sets aside Matter on 10% Pre-deposit out of remaining 50% [Read Order]")
50% Disputed GST Demand deposited in Wrong Head: Madras HC sets aside Matter on 10% Pre-deposit out of remaining 50% [Read Order]
The Madras High Court recently quashed a GST demand order, citing procedural lapses and violations of natural justice. Even though the 50% disputed...
![Madras HC slams Chennai Customs for Seizing Sri Lankan Bride’s Gold Thaali (mangalsutra) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Madras-HC-Chennai-Customs-Seizing-Sri-Lankan-Brides-Gold-Thaali-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC slams Chennai Customs for Seizing Sri Lankan Bride’s Gold Thaali (mangalsutra) [Read Order]")
![GST Evasion by Transporting Gold Jewellery citing Display at Exhibition: Madras HC upholds Confiscation Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/GST-Evasion-Transporting-Gold-Jewellery-Display-Exhibition-Madras-HC-Confiscation-Notice-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Evasion by Transporting Gold Jewellery citing Display at Exhibition: Madras HC upholds Confiscation Notice [Read Order]")
![Order in Deceaseds Name Despite Condonation of Delay Application by Legal Heir for Late ITR Filing: Madras HC directs Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/Madras-HC-Madras-High-Court-Madras-HC-Directs-Reconsideration-Order-in-Deceaseds-Name-Condonation-of-Delay-taxscan.jpg "Order in Deceaseds Name Despite Condonation of Delay Application by Legal Heir for Late ITR Filing: Madras HC directs Reconsideration [Read Order]")
![GST Consultant’s Failure to Notify Proceedings, Paid 90% of Disputed Tax: Madras HC Orders Fresh Hearing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/GST-Madras-High-Court-Madras-HC-decision-on-GST-dispute-Fresh-hearing-for-GST-tax-case-taxscan.jpg "GST Consultant’s Failure to Notify Proceedings, Paid 90% of Disputed Tax: Madras HC Orders Fresh Hearing [Read Order]")
GST ITC Blocking allowed Even with Zero ITC Balance in ECL: Madras HC delivers Detailed Interpretation of Rule 86A [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has ruled that the Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) under the GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) can be blocked even with zero ITC balance in the Electronic Credit Ledger (ECL). It was...
![GST ITC Blocking allowed Even with Zero ITC Balance in ECL: Madras HC delivers Detailed Interpretation of Rule 86A [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Madras-HC-Madras-High-Court-GST-Goods-and-Services-Tax-ITC-Input-Tax-Credit-Zero-ITC-Balance-in-ECL-taxscan.jpg "GST ITC Blocking allowed Even with Zero ITC Balance in ECL: Madras HC delivers Detailed Interpretation of Rule 86A [Read Order]")
[BREAKING] ITC Claims Permissible in GST Returns Filed On or Before 30th Nov 2021 for FYs 2017-18 to 2020-21: Madras HC rules in Light of Finance Act [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court has ruled that the Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) claims are permissible in the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) returns filed on or before 30th November 2021 for...
![[BREAKING] ITC Claims Permissible in GST Returns Filed On or Before 30th Nov 2021 for FYs 2017-18 to 2020-21: Madras HC rules in Light of Finance Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/gst-return-late-Filing-of-GST-return-GST-ITC-taxscan.jpg "[BREAKING] ITC Claims Permissible in GST Returns Filed On or Before 30th Nov 2021 for FYs 2017-18 to 2020-21: Madras HC rules in Light of Finance Act [Read Order]")
Co-Insurance Premiums and Reinsurance Commissions Not Taxable following Inclusion of Items 9 and 10 in Schedule III of CGST Act: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court ( HC ) ruled that co-insurance premiums and reinsurance commissions are not taxable under the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) following the inclusion of Items...
![Co-Insurance Premiums and Reinsurance Commissions Not Taxable following Inclusion of Items 9 and 10 in Schedule III of CGST Act: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/GST-Madras-High-Court-GST-Act-Insurance-premiums-Tax-Reinsurance-Commissions-tax-TAXSCAN-1.jpg "Co-Insurance Premiums and Reinsurance Commissions Not Taxable following Inclusion of Items 9 and 10 in Schedule III of CGST Act: Madras HC [Read Order]")
GST Dept neither considered Reply nor Provided any Hearing Opportunity before Passing Order: Madras HC sets aside Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court set aside the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand order noting that the GST department neither considered reply nor provided any hearing opportunity before passing the demand...
![GST Dept neither considered Reply nor Provided any Hearing Opportunity before Passing Order: Madras HC sets aside Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/GST-GST-Department-Madras-High-Court-High-Court-of-Madras-Goods-and-Services-Tax-GST-demand-order-Taxscan.jpg "GST Dept neither considered Reply nor Provided any Hearing Opportunity before Passing Order: Madras HC sets aside Order [Read Order]")
Madras HC Quashes GST Demand order issued against Deceased Proprietor after 4 Years of her Death, Remands Matter [Read Order]
The Madras High Court quashed the GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) demand order issued against the deceased proprietor after 4 years. The court remanded the matter for reconsideration. The counsel...
![Madras HC Quashes GST Demand order issued against Deceased Proprietor after 4 Years of her Death, Remands Matter [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Madras-HC-Madras-HC-Quashes-Madras-High-Court-GST-GST-Demand-Goods-and-Services-Tax-Remands-Matter-GST-Demand-order-taxscan.jpeg "Madras HC Quashes GST Demand order issued against Deceased Proprietor after 4 Years of her Death, Remands Matter [Read Order]")
GST Payer fails to File Reply within 90-Day Extension: Madras High Court upholds Demand Order, Dismisses Petition [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has upheld a Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand order after the assessee failed to submit a reply within the 90-day extension granted by the GST authorities. The...
![GST Payer fails to File Reply within 90-Day Extension: Madras High Court upholds Demand Order, Dismisses Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/GST-Madras-High-Court-GST-demand-order-GST-reply-filing-taxscan.jpg "GST Payer fails to File Reply within 90-Day Extension: Madras High Court upholds Demand Order, Dismisses Petition [Read Order]")