![Fees Paid to Liquidator to be Paid under Regulation 4(2)(b) of Liquidation Process Regulations on Realization and Distribution of Proceeds from Auction of Assets: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/NCLAT-Liquidation-Process-Liquidator-fees-Auction-of-Assets-TAXSCAN.jpg "Fees Paid to Liquidator to be Paid under Regulation 4(2)(b) of Liquidation Process Regulations on Realization and Distribution of Proceeds from Auction of Assets: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Fees Paid to Liquidator to be Paid under Regulation 4(2)(b) of Liquidation Process Regulations on Realization and Distribution of Proceeds from Auction of Assets: NCLAT [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) observed that the fees paid to Liquidator to be paid under Regulation...
Claim on Goods not in Possession of Port Authority cannot be treated as Secured Creditor under IBC: NCLAT
The Chennai Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal ( NCLAT ) ruled that the claim on goods not in possession of port authority cannot be treated as secured creditor under the Insolvency...
Proof beyond doubt that disobedience or breach was wilful necessary to constitute contempt of Tribunal's Orders: NCLAT
The New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal( NCLAT ) held that Resolution Professional(RP) proof beyond doubt that disobedience or breach was wilful necessary to...
Being part of Technical Bid of Cartel by Supplier of ‘Vinyl’ and ‘Flex’ is an Offence u/s 3(3)(c) of Competition Act: NCLAT upholds PenaltyÂ
The Principal bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal(NCLAT)has held that being part of the technical bid of a cartel by a supplier of ‘vinyl’ and ‘flex’ is an offence under section...
Claim of Return of Stock from CD Without any Solid Documentary Evidence is invalid: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Principal Bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the claim return of stock from the Corporate Debtor (CD) without any solid documentary evidence is invalid. ...
Delay beyond 15 days is Uncondonable as per Statutory Provisions; so as Delay of 45 days: NCLAT Delhi Dismisses Appeal
The Delhi National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) while dismissing the appeal held that delay beyond 15 days is uncondonable as per statutory provisions so no scope for condonation of delay...
