Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Composition of GSTAT is Unconstitutional, rules Madras High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/GSTAT-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Composition of GSTAT is Unconstitutional, rules Madras High Court [Read Judgment]")
Composition of GSTAT is Unconstitutional, rules Madras High Court [Read Judgment]
The Madras High Court has ruled that the constitution of GST Appellate Tribunal ( GSTAT ) is unconstitutional. The division bench comprising of...
![Old Newspapers sold as Waste Paper not liable to State Sales Tax: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Old-News-Papers-Taxscan.jpg "Old Newspapers sold as Waste Paper not liable to State Sales Tax: Madras HC [Read Order]")
![No Service Tax since Agreement for Work of Engineering Design as well as Construction is a Composite Contract: Madras HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Service-Tax-Construction-Taxscan.jpg "No Service Tax since Agreement for Work of Engineering Design as well as Construction is a Composite Contract: Madras HC [Read Judgment]")
Madras HC disallows depreciation on Computerised counting machine under the head ‘Computer & Computer peripherals’ [Read Judgment]
In a recent decision, the Madras High Court held that depreciation is not allowable to items such as Scanner, Computerised counting machine, CTP machines etc. under the head “computer and computer...
![Madras HC disallows depreciation on Computerised counting machine under the head ‘Computer & Computer peripherals’ [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Madras-High-Court-Tax-Scan-1.jpg "Madras HC disallows depreciation on Computerised counting machine under the head ‘Computer & Computer peripherals’ [Read Judgment]")
Right to Cross Examine is an essential element of Natural Justice Principles; Madras HC quashes order of CESTAT for not granting opportunity to Cross-Examination [Read Order]
The Madras High Court, in a recently quashed the Order of the CESTAT, Chennai in which the appellant was denied the right to cross-examine the necessary parties at the time of proceedings under the...
![Right to Cross Examine is an essential element of Natural Justice Principles; Madras HC quashes order of CESTAT for not granting opportunity to Cross-Examination [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Madras-High-Court-Tax-Scan.jpg "Right to Cross Examine is an essential element of Natural Justice Principles; Madras HC quashes order of CESTAT for not granting opportunity to Cross-Examination [Read Order]")
Assessee is entitled for deduction u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act to the interest on loan waived by bank in one time settlement: Madras HC [Read Order]
The division bench of Madras High Court upheld the decision of ITAT holding that the assessee is entitled for deduction under Section 43B of the Income Tax Act with respect to the interest on loan...