![S. 65 of GST Act Does Not Require Audit Report to Indicate ‘Fraud or Misstatement or Suppression of Facts’ for Demand u/s 74: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Madras-High-Court-Audit-Report-Section-65-CGST-Act-GST-audit-report-taxscan.jpg "S. 65 of GST Act Does Not Require Audit Report to Indicate ‘Fraud or Misstatement or Suppression of Facts’ for Demand u/s 74: Madras HC [Read Order]")
S. 65 of GST Act Does Not Require Audit Report to Indicate ‘Fraud or Misstatement or Suppression of Facts’ for Demand u/s 74: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court clarified that the Section 65 of the Central Goods and Services Tax ( CGST Act ), 2017 does not require the audit report to...
![GST Notice uploaded in “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab Portal, Unaware of Proceedings: Madras HC remands for Reconsideration on Pre-deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-high-court-GST-portal-GST-additional-Notices-and-Orders-petitioner-pre-deposit-taxscan.jpg "GST Notice uploaded in “View Additional Notices and Orders” tab Portal, Unaware of Proceedings: Madras HC remands for Reconsideration on Pre-deposit [Read Order]")
![Proceedings against deceased Unsustainable: Madras HC Sets Aside Order Citing Timely Intimation of Death to Income Tax Officer [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-High-Court-Income-Tax-penalty-Income-Tax-Income-Tax-penalty-proceedings-taxscan.jpg "Proceedings against deceased Unsustainable: Madras HC Sets Aside Order Citing Timely Intimation of Death to Income Tax Officer [Read Order]")
![Counterparts Barred from Initiating Proceedings Against CGST or SGST Allocated assessees in absence of Cross Empowerment Notification: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Counterparts-Barred-CGST-SGST-Cross-Empowerment-Notification-Madras-HC-taxscan.jpg "Counterparts Barred from Initiating Proceedings Against CGST or SGST Allocated assessees in absence of Cross Empowerment Notification: Madras HC [Read Order]")
![GST Consultant fails to inform GST Proceedings w.r.t. GSTR 3B vs 2A Disparity: Madras HC mandates 10% Pre-deposit for Remand [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-GSTR-3B-GSTR-2A-Madras-high-court-GST-Consultant-service-Taxscan.jpg "GST Consultant fails to inform GST Proceedings w.r.t. GSTR 3B vs 2A Disparity: Madras HC mandates 10% Pre-deposit for Remand [Read Order]")
ITC availed Reversed due GSTR 3B returns and GSTR 2A Discrepancy : Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit for Reconsideration [Read Order]
The Madras High Court ordered reconsideration of the issue of Input Tax Credit ( ITC ) under Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) reversed due to the discrepancy in GSTR 3B returns and GSTR 2A. The...
![ITC availed Reversed due GSTR 3B returns and GSTR 2A Discrepancy : Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit for Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-high-court-madras-hc-GST-GSTR-3B-GSTR-2A-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITC availed Reversed due GSTR 3B returns and GSTR 2A Discrepancy : Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit for Reconsideration [Read Order]")
Madras HC Remands Income Tax Reassessment & Penalty Orders Citing Lack of Participation; Directs Petitioner to Respond to SCN [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has rendered a verdict remanding income tax reassessment and penalty orders, highlighting a critical deficiency in the participation of the petitioner. The case revolves...
![Madras HC Remands Income Tax Reassessment & Penalty Orders Citing Lack of Participation; Directs Petitioner to Respond to SCN [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-High-Court-Income-tax-Income-tax-reassessment-Respond-to-show-cause-notice-show-cause-notice-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC Remands Income Tax Reassessment & Penalty Orders Citing Lack of Participation; Directs Petitioner to Respond to SCN [Read Order]")
Adjournment Request Disregarded, No Reasonable Hearing Opportunity Provided: Madras HC sets aside GST Demand Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court quashed the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand order as the adjournment request of the petitioner was disregarded and no reasonable opportunity was provided. Thus, the court...
![Adjournment Request Disregarded, No Reasonable Hearing Opportunity Provided: Madras HC sets aside GST Demand Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-HC-Goods-and-Services-Tax-GST-Demand-Order-Madras-HC-sets-aside-GST-Demand-Order-taxscan.jpg "Adjournment Request Disregarded, No Reasonable Hearing Opportunity Provided: Madras HC sets aside GST Demand Order [Read Order]")
GST Liability of 8.3L Confirmed on alleged Misconception of Intra and Inter State Sales : Madras HC remands for Reconsideration on Pre-deposit [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court directed reconsideration of the matter with respect to the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) liability of Rs. 8.3L confirmed on misconception of Intra and Inter...
![GST Liability of 8.3L Confirmed on alleged Misconception of Intra and Inter State Sales : Madras HC remands for Reconsideration on Pre-deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Liability-Misconception-of-Intra-and-Inter-State-Sales-Madras-HC-Reconsideration-on-Pre-deposit-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Liability of 8.3L Confirmed on alleged Misconception of Intra and Inter State Sales : Madras HC remands for Reconsideration on Pre-deposit [Read Order]")
GST Demand Confirmed Without GSTR 9C Consideration: Madras HC Orders Pre-deposit of Rs. 2.50 Crore [Read Order]
The Madras High Court ordered a pre-deposit of Rs. 2.50 crores for setting aside the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand which was confirmed without the consideration of GSTR 9C. Renaatus...
![GST Demand Confirmed Without GSTR 9C Consideration: Madras HC Orders Pre-deposit of Rs. 2.50 Crore [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Demand-GSTR-9C-Madras-HC-Pre-deposit-taxscan.jpg "GST Demand Confirmed Without GSTR 9C Consideration: Madras HC Orders Pre-deposit of Rs. 2.50 Crore [Read Order]")
Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court, while remanding the matter on 10% Pre-deposit condition, observed that the taxpayers must regularly monitor the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) portal. A Single bench of...
![Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Portal-GST-TAX-NEWS-Madras-High-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Proper Officer failed to Explain Reason for Recovering Amount u/s 78 of TNGST Act before Limitation Period: Madras HC directs Refund [Read Order]
The Madras High Court directed the refund of the recovered amount as the proper officer failed to explain the reason for recovering the amount under Section 78 of Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax,...
![Proper Officer failed to Explain Reason for Recovering Amount u/s 78 of TNGST Act before Limitation Period: Madras HC directs Refund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-High-Court-TNGST-GST-GST-Refund-Section-78-of-TNGST-taxscan.jpg "Proper Officer failed to Explain Reason for Recovering Amount u/s 78 of TNGST Act before Limitation Period: Madras HC directs Refund [Read Order]")