![S. 138 NI Act Cases: Supreme Court issues New Format for Synopsis to be Attached with Complaint [Read Judgement]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/09/27/500x300_2091535-supreme-court-taxscan.webp "S. 138 NI Act Cases: Supreme Court issues New Format for Synopsis to be Attached with Complaint [Read Judgement]")
S. 138 NI Act Cases: Supreme Court issues New Format for Synopsis to be Attached with Complaint [Read Judgement]
The Supreme Court has directed that all complaints filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (cheque bounce cases) must...
![Difference of grounds between Order and SCN: Delhi HC quashes proceedings [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Difference-of-grounds-between-Order-and-SCN-Delhi-HC-show-cause-notice-order-Taxscan.jpg "Difference of grounds between Order and SCN: Delhi HC quashes proceedings [Read Order]")
![Writ Remedy cannot be invoked in Tax Matters as IT Act provides complete machinery for Assessment / Re-assessment: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Writ-Remedy-Tax-IT-Act-Assessment-Re-assessment-Delhi-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Writ Remedy cannot be invoked in Tax Matters as IT Act provides complete machinery for Assessment / Re-assessment: Delhi HC [Read Order]")
![Licensing of Microsoft Softwares in India is not Taxable as ‘Royalty’ as per Indo-US Treaty: Delhi HC [Read judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Licensing-of-Microsoft-Softwares-in-India-Taxable-Royalty-Indo-US-Treaty-Delhi-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Licensing of Microsoft Softwares in India is not Taxable as ‘Royalty’ as per Indo-US Treaty: Delhi HC [Read judgment]")
![Period of Tax Appeal filed before an Authority without Jurisdiction shall be excluded from Limitation Period: Delhi HC upholds Validity of Revision Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Period-of-Tax-Limitation-Period-Delhi-HC-Revision-Petition.jpg "Period of Tax Appeal filed before an Authority without Jurisdiction shall be excluded from Limitation Period: Delhi HC upholds Validity of Revision Petition [Read Order]")
Remand is not a power to be exercised by ITAT in routine manner but to be used sparingly: Delhi High Court grants partial relief to Microsoft India [Read Judgment]
The Delhi High Court while granting the partial relief to Microsoft India held that the remand is not a power to be exercised by ITAT in a routine manner but to be used sparingly. The assessee,...
![Remand is not a power to be exercised by ITAT in routine manner but to be used sparingly: Delhi High Court grants partial relief to Microsoft India [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Microsoft-India-ITAT-Delhi-High-court-Taxscan.jpg "Remand is not a power to be exercised by ITAT in routine manner but to be used sparingly: Delhi High Court grants partial relief to Microsoft India [Read Judgment]")
GST: Delhi High Court seeks Centre’s reply on plea challenging Constitutionality of Power to Arrest under CGST Act
The Delhi High Court has sought the Centre and Directorate General of GST Intelligence’s (DGGI) reply on a plea challenging the constitutional validity of various provisions of the Central...
GST: Citing COVID-19 pandemic, Delhi HC allows Samsonite to deposit Profiteered Amount within 6 months [Read Order]
The Delhi HC via video conferencing allows Samsonite to deposit the principal profiteered amount of Rs. 21.2 crores (after adjustment of Rs. 3 crores which amount to GST) in 6 equated monthly...
![GST: Citing COVID-19 pandemic, Delhi HC allows Samsonite to deposit Profiteered Amount within 6 months [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Samsonite-Profiteered-Amount-Taxscan.jpeg "GST: Citing COVID-19 pandemic, Delhi HC allows Samsonite to deposit Profiteered Amount within 6 months [Read Order]")
GST: Delhi HC stays Penalty proceedings of 75 Cr. against Patanjali Ayurved by Anti-Profiteering Authority [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court on Friday stayed the penalty proceedings initiated against Patanjali Ayurved for allegedly profiteering Rs 75 crore through sale of its products. The stay was subjected to the...
![GST: Delhi HC stays Penalty proceedings of 75 Cr. against Patanjali Ayurved by Anti-Profiteering Authority [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Patanjali-Ayurved-penalty-proceedings-Taxscan.jpg "GST: Delhi HC stays Penalty proceedings of 75 Cr. against Patanjali Ayurved by Anti-Profiteering Authority [Read Order]")
SCN quashed where it was possible for authority to adjudicate within period of limitation: Delhi HC [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court in the case of Sunder System Pvt Ltd v Union of India held that the SCN to be quashed where it was possible on behalf of the adjudicating authority to adjudicate within the period...
![SCN quashed where it was possible for authority to adjudicate within period of limitation: Delhi HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Delhi-High-Court-1-Tax-Scan.jpg "SCN quashed where it was possible for authority to adjudicate within period of limitation: Delhi HC [Read Order]")