Karnataka High Court
Karnataka High Court,Karnataka HC,High Court of Karnataka, High Court of Mysore,Bangalore High Court
![Limitation Period of One Year applicable to Excise Refund Claims: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Refund-Taxscan.jpg "Limitation Period of One Year applicable to Excise Refund Claims: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]")
Limitation Period of One Year applicable to Excise Refund Claims: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]
The Karnataka High Court held that refund applications filed under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 cannot be without reference to limitation or time...
![GST Interest Recovery and Attachment of Bank Account can’t be done without Notice: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Income-Tax-Proceedings-Karnataka-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "GST Interest Recovery and Attachment of Bank Account can’t be done without Notice: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]")
![ATM is Computer: ITAT allows 60% Depreciation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/ATM-RBI-Taxscan.jpg "ATM is Computer: ITAT allows 60% Depreciation [Read Order]")
![Co-Operative Society registered under Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act eligible of Tax Deduction: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Souharda-Sahakari-Act-Karnataka-High-Court-Income-Tax-Act-Society-Taxscan.jpg "Co-Operative Society registered under Karnataka Souharda Sahakari Act eligible of Tax Deduction: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]")
No Immunity to Companies from Prosecution merely because of Punishment prescribed is Mandatory Imprisonment: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]
The Karnataka High Court has held that there is no immunity to the companies from prosecution merely because the prosecution is in respect of offences for which the punishment prescribed is Mandatory...
![No Immunity to Companies from Prosecution merely because of Punishment prescribed is Mandatory Imprisonment: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Notice-Karnataka-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "No Immunity to Companies from Prosecution merely because of Punishment prescribed is Mandatory Imprisonment: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]")
ITC Claim not shown in VAT Return can’t be availed through merely Filing Form 240: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]
The Karnataka High Court has held that the Input Tax Credit ITC claim not shown in the VAT Return cannot be availed through merely filing Form 240. The Court observed that, When the statutory...
![ITC Claim not shown in VAT Return can’t be availed through merely Filing Form 240: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Input-Tax-Credit-Taxscan.jpg "ITC Claim not shown in VAT Return can’t be availed through merely Filing Form 240: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]")
Financial Stringency would not justify Non-Remittance of TDS amount to Govt: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]
The division Bench of the Karnataka High Court has observed that financial stringency would not justify the non-remittance of TDS to the Government, in as much as, it would amount to the utilization...
![Financial Stringency would not justify Non-Remittance of TDS amount to Govt: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Entry-Tax-Karnataka-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Financial Stringency would not justify Non-Remittance of TDS amount to Govt: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]")
Madras HC upholds Provision mandating Vacation of Directorship by Defaulting Directors under Companies Act [Read Judgment]
The Madras High Court held that Section 167(1)(a) Companies Act not Violative of Articles 14, and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India. The judgement was rendered by the divisional bench consisting...
![Madras HC upholds Provision mandating Vacation of Directorship by Defaulting Directors under Companies Act [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Reassessment-Madras-High-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Madras HC upholds Provision mandating Vacation of Directorship by Defaulting Directors under Companies Act [Read Judgment]")
![Tax Amount to be indicated in the Tax Invoice under Sec 33: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Tax-Invoice-Karnataka-High-Court-Taxscan-1.jpg "Tax Amount to be indicated in the Tax Invoice under Sec 33: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]")
Mistake Committed by Chartered Accountant in filing VAT Form 240 not a mistake to attract Section 69[1] of the VAT Act: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]
The Karnataka High Court has ruled that any mistake said to have been committed by the learned Chartered Accountant in filing VAT Form 240 would not be construed as the mistake apparent from the...
![Mistake Committed by Chartered Accountant in filing VAT Form 240 not a mistake to attract Section 69[1] of the VAT Act: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/CA-Chartered-Accountants-Taxscan.jpg "Mistake Committed by Chartered Accountant in filing VAT Form 240 not a mistake to attract Section 69[1] of the VAT Act: Karnataka HC [Read Judgment]")