Karnataka High Court
Karnataka High Court,Karnataka HC,High Court of Karnataka, High Court of Mysore,Bangalore High Court
![Karnataka HC Grants IGST Refund to Columbia Sportswear, Clarifies Intermediary vs. Principal-to-Principal Distinction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/refund-Service-Tax-Address-Mismatch-taxscan.jpg "Karnataka HC Grants IGST Refund to Columbia Sportswear, Clarifies Intermediary vs. Principal-to-Principal Distinction [Read Order]")
Karnataka HC Grants IGST Refund to Columbia Sportswear, Clarifies Intermediary vs. Principal-to-Principal Distinction [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Karnataka High Court directed the Revenue Department to refund the Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) along with...
![Karnataka HC Halts Coercive Recovery of ₹9.5 Crore GST from Nexus Shantiniketan Retail; Advises Appellate Remedy [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Karnataka-HC-Halts-Coercive-Recovery-GST-GST-from-Nexus-Shantiniketan-taxscan.jpg "Karnataka HC Halts Coercive Recovery of ₹9.5 Crore GST from Nexus Shantiniketan Retail; Advises Appellate Remedy [Read Order]")
![Relief to Toyota Boshoku: ITAT Rules Royalty Payments to Parent Company Justified, Rejects Dept’s NIL Valuation Claim [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Relief-to-Toyota-Boshoku-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief to Toyota Boshoku: ITAT Rules Royalty Payments to Parent Company Justified, Rejects Dept’s NIL Valuation Claim [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [April 19th to April 25th,2025]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Weekly-Round-up-Supreme-Court-High-Courts-Supreme-Court-High-Courts-Weekly-Round-up-Taxscan.jpeg "Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [April 19th to April 25th,2025]")
Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory Before FIR in Corruption Cases Against Public Servants: Supreme Court [Read Order]
The Supreme Court of India ruled that a preliminary enquiry is not a mandatory precondition for registering an FIR against a public servant accused of corruption, provided the source information is...
![Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory Before FIR in Corruption Cases Against Public Servants: Supreme Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Preliminary-Inquiry-Preliminary-Inquiry-Not-Mandatory-FIR-FIR-in-Corruption-Cases-taxscan.jpg "Preliminary Inquiry Not Mandatory Before FIR in Corruption Cases Against Public Servants: Supreme Court [Read Order]")
Karnataka HC Holds ₹25 Crore Stamp Duty Cap Excludes 10% Cess as S.3B of Karnataka Stamp Act Functions Independently [Read Order]
The Karnataka High Court,upheld the validity of an additional ₹2.5 crore stamp duty charged as 10% cess under Section 3B of the Karnataka Stamp Act,1957 ruling that the ₹25 crore cap under Article...
![Karnataka HC Holds ₹25 Crore Stamp Duty Cap Excludes 10% Cess as S.3B of Karnataka Stamp Act Functions Independently [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Karnataka-HC-Stamp-Duty-Cap-Cess-Karnataka-Stamp-Act-Independently-taxscan.webp "Karnataka HC Holds ₹25 Crore Stamp Duty Cap Excludes 10% Cess as S.3B of Karnataka Stamp Act Functions Independently [Read Order]")
![Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [April 12th to April 18th,2025]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Supreme-Court-High-Courts-Weekly-Round-up.jpg "Supreme Court & High Courts Weekly Round-up [April 12th to April 18th,2025]")
ITAT Allows Rs. 6.47 Crore Lease Rent Expense as Deduction Citing Lessee’s Right to Claim Depreciation [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)], which allowed depreciation as an alternative claim on finance lease...
![ITAT Allows Rs. 6.47 Crore Lease Rent Expense as Deduction Citing Lessee’s Right to Claim Depreciation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Depreciation-ITAT-Lease-Rent-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT Allows Rs. 6.47 Crore Lease Rent Expense as Deduction Citing Lessee’s Right to Claim Depreciation [Read Order]")
Allegation of Illegal Gratification u/s 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act with uncorroborated Evidence is not Conclusive: Karnataka HC [Read Order]
The Karnataka High Court held that the allegation of illegal gratification under section 13 (1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with uncorroborated evidence is not conclusive. Yogesh,...
![Allegation of Illegal Gratification u/s 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act with uncorroborated Evidence is not Conclusive: Karnataka HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Karnataka-High-Court-Illegal-Gratification-Evidence-is-not-Conclusive-taxscan.jpg "Allegation of Illegal Gratification u/s 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act with uncorroborated Evidence is not Conclusive: Karnataka HC [Read Order]")