Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![NCLAT upholds ₹36.53 Crore Liability against Former Directors in Fraudulent Trading Case [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/12/07/500x300_2110721-nclat-upholds-liability-former-directors-fraudulent-trading-case.webp "NCLAT upholds ₹36.53 Crore Liability against Former Directors in Fraudulent Trading Case [Read Order]")
NCLAT upholds ₹36.53 Crore Liability against Former Directors in Fraudulent Trading Case [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench at New Delhi, has dismissed an appeal filed by former directors of Chamber...
![NCLAT Dismisses Appeal, Grants Liberty to Seek Withdrawal of CIRP Under Section 12A; CoC Constitution Deferred for Two Weeks [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/29/250x150_2070453-download-nclat-dismisses-appeal-grants-liberty-to-seek-withdrawal-of-cirp-under-section-12a-coc-constitution-deferred-for-two-weeks.webp "NCLAT Dismisses Appeal, Grants Liberty to Seek Withdrawal of CIRP Under Section 12A; CoC Constitution Deferred for Two Weeks [Read Order]")
Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]
In a recent ruling , the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that delay in filing an appeal beyond 15 days as per section 61(2) proviso of the Insolvency...
![Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Appeal-Delayed-Condonable-as-Per-Proviso-Per-Proviso-Section-612-of-IBC-IBC-NCLAT-NCLAT-refuses-NCLAT-refuses-to-Condone-Kotak-Mahindra-taxscan.jpg "Appeal Delayed Beyond 15 Days Not Condonable as Per Proviso of Section 61(2) of IBC: NCLAT refuses to Condone 19 Days Delay by Kotak Mahindra [Read Order]")
![Unexplained Cash Deposit of ₹6.5 Lakh during Demonetization: ITAT Remands Case for fresh [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Demonetization-Unexplained-Cash-Deposit-ITAT-Remands-Case-taxscan.jpg "Unexplained Cash Deposit of ₹6.5 Lakh during Demonetization: ITAT Remands Case for fresh [Read Order]")
ITAT upholds Addition of Unexplained Income under Section 69A due to Assessee's Non-Compliance [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) upheld the addition of unexplained income under Section 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to the assessee's continuous non-compliance. ...
![ITAT upholds Addition of Unexplained Income under Section 69A due to Assessees Non-Compliance [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Unexplained-Money-Banking-Channel-sale-Consideration-of-Shares-ITAT-Upholds-Addition-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "ITAT upholds Addition of Unexplained Income under Section 69A due to Assessees Non-Compliance [Read Order]")