Madras High Court
Madras High Court,Madras HC ,High court of Madras,Chennai High Court,Tamil Nadu High Court
![RLDA Not a Juristic Entity, Madras HC sets aside Property Tax by Municipality on Railway Land Being Unconstitutional [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/20/500x300_2051133-rlda-madras-hc-property-taxrailway-land-being-unconstitutional-taxscan.webp "RLDA Not a Juristic Entity, Madras HC sets aside Property Tax by Municipality on Railway Land Being Unconstitutional [Read Order]")
RLDA Not a Juristic Entity, Madras HC sets aside Property Tax by Municipality on Railway Land Being Unconstitutional [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has held that the Railway Land Development Authority (RLDA) is not a juristic entity and set aside the property tax imposed by...
![At Least One GST Reminder Must Be Sent via RPAD Before Passing Ex-Parte Order : Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/250x150_2050643-gst-reminder-gst-reminder-must-be-sent-via-rpad-via-rpad-taxscan.webp "At Least One GST Reminder Must Be Sent via RPAD Before Passing Ex-Parte Order : Madras HC [Read Order]")
![Reopening of Assessment Without Complying with S. 143(2) Procedure Is Bad in Law: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/250x150_2050631-procedure-procedure-is-bad-in-law-madras-high-court-taxscan.webp "Reopening of Assessment Without Complying with S. 143(2) Procedure Is Bad in Law: Madras HC [Read Order]")
![Income Tax Deduction u/s 80HHC Had to Be Given Without Reducing S. 80IB Deduction: Madras HC Follows SC Ruling [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/250x150_2050629-income-tax-deduction-income-tax-deduction-madras-hc-taxscan.webp "Income Tax Deduction u/s 80HHC Had to Be Given Without Reducing S. 80IB Deduction: Madras HC Follows SC Ruling [Read Order]")
![GST Appeal filing Delayed by 58 Days due to Pendency in Rectification Application: Madras HC Grants Relief [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/250x150_2050617-gst-appeal-filing-gst-appeal-pendency-in-rectification-application-taxscan.webp "GST Appeal filing Delayed by 58 Days due to Pendency in Rectification Application: Madras HC Grants Relief [Read Order]")
GST Demand of Rs. 16.67Cr Mechanically Confirmed on Mismatch in ITC Claim: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has set aside a GST ( Goods and Services Tax ) demand of ₹16.67 crore raised against a tollway company, holding that the proceedings were mechanical and failed to consider the...
![GST Demand of Rs. 16.67Cr Mechanically Confirmed on Mismatch in ITC Claim: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/19/500x300_2050620-madras-hc-gst-demand-mismatch-itc-taxscan.webp "GST Demand of Rs. 16.67Cr Mechanically Confirmed on Mismatch in ITC Claim: Madras HC Quashes Order [Read Order]")
Inadvertent Non-Compliance of Pre-Deposit Condition: Madras HC Restores GST Appeal on conditions [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has restored a Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) appeal considering the petitioner’s inadvertent failure to pay the mandatory 10% pre-deposit and directed the petitioner to...
![Inadvertent Non-Compliance of Pre-Deposit Condition: Madras HC Restores GST Appeal on conditions [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/18/500x300_2049929-inadvertent-non-compliance-inadvertent-non-compliance-of-pre-deposit-condition-taxscan.webp "Inadvertent Non-Compliance of Pre-Deposit Condition: Madras HC Restores GST Appeal on conditions [Read Order]")
![Madras HC Validates Reassessment Notices Issued Pre-Finance Act, 2021 Citing TOLA Extension [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/18/500x300_2049916-reassessment-notices-finance-act-notices-taxscan.webp "Madras HC Validates Reassessment Notices Issued Pre-Finance Act, 2021 Citing TOLA Extension [Read Order]")
Madras HC Strikes Down Central Excise R.8(4) Ultra Vires, Quashes Demand Orders With Fresh Hearing [Read Order]
The Madras High Court has struck down Rule 8(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 2001 and 2002, declaring it inconsistent with Rules 3 and 4 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2001 and 2002, and ultra vires...
![Madras HC Strikes Down Central Excise R.8(4) Ultra Vires, Quashes Demand Orders With Fresh Hearing [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/18/500x300_2050001-cdc7d6e5-d824-4c7f-9a74-7a7ef9c5ac5b.jfif "Madras HC Strikes Down Central Excise R.8(4) Ultra Vires, Quashes Demand Orders With Fresh Hearing [Read Order]")
ED Search under PMLA Not Harassment: Madras HC Allows PMLA Proceedings Against TASMAC to Continue [Read Order]
The High Court of Madras, held that the Enforcement Directorate’s search under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) was lawful and did not amount to harassment, allowing proceedings ...
![ED Search under PMLA Not Harassment: Madras HC Allows PMLA Proceedings Against TASMAC to Continue [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/18/500x300_2049680-ed.webp "ED Search under PMLA Not Harassment: Madras HC Allows PMLA Proceedings Against TASMAC to Continue [Read Order]")
Proviso to S.3-B(2)(d) of TNGST Act Not Applicable to Contractor Assigning Work to Registered Sub-Contractor: Madras HC [Read Order]
The High Court of Madras held that the proviso to Section 3-B(2)(d) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, would not apply where a contractor assigns work to a registered sub-contractor. ...
![Proviso to S.3-B(2)(d) of TNGST Act Not Applicable to Contractor Assigning Work to Registered Sub-Contractor: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/17/500x300_2049407-section-3-b2d-of-tngst-act-tngst-act-tngst-act-not-applicable-taxscan.webp "Proviso to S.3-B(2)(d) of TNGST Act Not Applicable to Contractor Assigning Work to Registered Sub-Contractor: Madras HC [Read Order]")