Madras High Court
Madras High Court,Madras HC ,High court of Madras,Chennai High Court,Tamil Nadu High Court
![Adjournment Request Disregarded, No Reasonable Hearing Opportunity Provided: Madras HC sets aside GST Demand Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-HC-Goods-and-Services-Tax-GST-Demand-Order-Madras-HC-sets-aside-GST-Demand-Order-taxscan.jpg "Adjournment Request Disregarded, No Reasonable Hearing Opportunity Provided: Madras HC sets aside GST Demand Order [Read Order]")
Adjournment Request Disregarded, No Reasonable Hearing Opportunity Provided: Madras HC sets aside GST Demand Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court quashed the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand order as the adjournment request of the petitioner was disregarded and no...
![GST Liability of 8.3L Confirmed on alleged Misconception of Intra and Inter State Sales : Madras HC remands for Reconsideration on Pre-deposit [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Liability-Misconception-of-Intra-and-Inter-State-Sales-Madras-HC-Reconsideration-on-Pre-deposit-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Liability of 8.3L Confirmed on alleged Misconception of Intra and Inter State Sales : Madras HC remands for Reconsideration on Pre-deposit [Read Order]")
![No Additions Proposed in Income Tax Assessment Order: Madras HC quashes Demand in Computation Sheet and Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Income-Tax-Assessment-Order-Madras-HC-Computation-Sheet-Notice-taxscan.jpg "No Additions Proposed in Income Tax Assessment Order: Madras HC quashes Demand in Computation Sheet and Notice [Read Order]")
![Madras HC dismisses WP against Revision Order, Stresses Distinction from Scrutiny Assessment Order u/s 143(3) of IT Act; Directs Pursuit of Statutory Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-HC-WP-Revision-Order-Scrutiny-Assessment-Order-IT-Act-Statutory-Appeal-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC dismisses WP against Revision Order, Stresses Distinction from Scrutiny Assessment Order u/s 143(3) of IT Act; Directs Pursuit of Statutory Appeal [Read Order]")
![Madras HC sets aside GST DRC-07 Order issued without Considering Reply Submitted, Remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-HC-GST-GST-DRC-07-Order-Reply-Submitted-Reconsideration-taxscan.jpg "Madras HC sets aside GST DRC-07 Order issued without Considering Reply Submitted, Remands for Reconsideration [Read Order]")
Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court, while remanding the matter on 10% Pre-deposit condition, observed that the taxpayers must regularly monitor the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) portal. AÂ Single bench of...
![Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Portal-GST-TAX-NEWS-Madras-High-Court-TAXSCAN.jpg "Taxpayers Must Regularly Monitor GST Portal; Unawareness as Justification Not Convincing: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Proper Officer failed to Explain Reason for Recovering Amount u/s 78 of TNGST Act before Limitation Period: Madras HC directs Refund [Read Order]
The Madras High Court directed the refund of the recovered amount as the proper officer failed to explain the reason for recovering the amount under Section 78 of Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax,...
![Proper Officer failed to Explain Reason for Recovering Amount u/s 78 of TNGST Act before Limitation Period: Madras HC directs Refund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Madras-High-Court-TNGST-GST-GST-Refund-Section-78-of-TNGST-taxscan.jpg "Proper Officer failed to Explain Reason for Recovering Amount u/s 78 of TNGST Act before Limitation Period: Madras HC directs Refund [Read Order]")
CBDT’s Office Memo (Instr No.1914) does not Mandate 20% Remittance of Disputed Tax for Stay Application: Madras HC [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court ruled that the Office Memorandum (Instruction No.1914) of the Central Board of Direct Taxes ( CBDT ) does not mandate 20% remittance of the disputed tax for...
Unawareness of Proceedings w.r.t GST Returns Disparity due to Order Uploaded in Additional Notices and Orders tab: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit Remand
The Madras High Court ordered a pre-deposit of 10% for contesting the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) demand which confirmed failure to respond to the Goods and Services Tax ( GST ) proceedings as...
GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, Income Tax Document Not Enough to Establish Goods Transport Services falls under RCM Category: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court held that the documents such as GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, and Income Tax records alone are insufficient to establish that Goods Transport Services fall under the Reverse Charge Mechanism...
![GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, Income Tax Document Not Enough to Establish Goods Transport Services falls under RCM Category: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/GST-Reverse-Charge-Mechanism-Goods-Transport-Services-Madras-High-Court-GSTR-9-GSTR-9C-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "GSTR 9, GSTR 9C, Income Tax Document Not Enough to Establish Goods Transport Services falls under RCM Category: Madras HC [Read Order]")
Non-Participation in GST Proceedings Confirmed Tax Liability with 100% Penalty: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit to Contest [Read Order]
The Madras High Court orders pre-deposit of 10% of the disputed demand to nullify the contested order. The court's decision came in light of the assessee's non-participation in the Goods and Services...
![Non-Participation in GST Proceedings Confirmed Tax Liability with 100% Penalty: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit to Contest [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Goods-and-service-tax-Madras-High-court-Tax-Liability-GST-Proceedings-GST-penalty-taxscan.jpg "Non-Participation in GST Proceedings Confirmed Tax Liability with 100% Penalty: Madras HC orders 10% Pre-deposit to Contest [Read Order]")
Faceless Personal Hearing is mandatory u/s 144B(6)(8) of Income Tax Act if Requested: Madras HC Interprets term ‘Shall’
In a recent ruling, the Madras High Court has ruled that the faceless personal hearing is mandatory under Section 144B(6)(8) of Income Tax Act, 1961 if requested. The court interpreted the ‘Shall’ in...
