![CESTAT upholds Duty Valuation under Rule 10A, Rejects Vehicle Manufacturers appeal on Refund Claim [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/CESTAT-Duty-Valuation-Vehicle-Manufacturer-appeal-Refund-Claim-taxscan.jpg "CESTAT upholds Duty Valuation under Rule 10A, Rejects Vehicle Manufacturers appeal on Refund Claim [Read Order]")
CESTAT upholds Duty Valuation under Rule 10A, Rejects Vehicle Manufacturer's appeal on Refund Claim [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Chandigarh bench of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) upheld the duty valuation made under...
![Interest Not Allowable When Customs Refund was Granted within 3 months from Date of Final Assessment under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/CESTAT-CESTAT-Chandigarh-Customs-Act-Interest-Interest-Not-Allowable-Customs-Refund-Final-Assessment-Granted-Customs-taxscan.jpg "Interest Not Allowable When Customs Refund was Granted within 3 months from Date of Final Assessment under Customs Act: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty u/s 78 of Finance Act Not Invokable in Absence of Invocation of Extended Limitation Period: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Penalty-Finance-Act-Absence-of-Invocation-Limitation-Period-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 78 of Finance Act Not Invokable in Absence of Invocation of Extended Limitation Period: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![No Penalty Imposable in Absence of Intent to Evade Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Penalty-Imposable-Absence-of-Intent-to-Evade-Tax-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "No Penalty Imposable in Absence of Intent to Evade Tax: CESTAT [Read Order]")
![Demanding Service Tax under Financial Leasing without Considering Nature of Transaction is invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Demanding-Service-Tax-Financial-Leasing-Considering-Nature-Transaction-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Demanding Service Tax under Financial Leasing without Considering Nature of Transaction is invalid: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Deodorants not Prohibited Goods under Drugs and Cosmetics Rules: CESTAT deletes Penalties Citing Re-determination of value w.r.t. non-existing Illegal Imports [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ), South Zonal Bench, Chennai, has held that deodorants are not considered prohibited goods under the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules, 1945....
![Deodorants not Prohibited Goods under Drugs and Cosmetics Rules: CESTAT deletes Penalties Citing Re-determination of value w.r.t. non-existing Illegal Imports [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/CESTAT-CESTAT-Chennai-Deodorants-legality-Drugs-and-Cosmetics-Rules-Penalties-taxscan.jpg "Deodorants not Prohibited Goods under Drugs and Cosmetics Rules: CESTAT deletes Penalties Citing Re-determination of value w.r.t. non-existing Illegal Imports [Read Order]")
Intention to Evade Payment of Excise duty not Established: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/r 25 of Central Excise Rules [Read Order]
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) quashed penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 as the intention to evade payment of excise duty was not established....
![Intention to Evade Payment of Excise duty not Established: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/r 25 of Central Excise Rules [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/CESTAT-CESTAT-Chandigarh-Excise-Duty-Customs-CESTAT-quashes-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "Intention to Evade Payment of Excise duty not Established: CESTAT quashes Penalty u/r 25 of Central Excise Rules [Read Order]")
Ingredients for Invocation of Extended Period not Alleged: CESTAT upholds Non-Imposition of Penalty u/s 11A of Central Excise Act [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal ( CESTAT ) upheld the non-imposition of penalty under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act, 1944 as there was no...
![Ingredients for Invocation of Extended Period not Alleged: CESTAT upholds Non-Imposition of Penalty u/s 11A of Central Excise Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/CESTAT-CESTAT-Chandigarh-Non-Imposition-of-Penalty-Penalty-Excise-Customs-TAXSCAN.jpg "Ingredients for Invocation of Extended Period not Alleged: CESTAT upholds Non-Imposition of Penalty u/s 11A of Central Excise Act [Read Order]")
Input Tax Credit Can be Claimed on Service Received from a Foreign Service Provider: CESTAT Grants Relief to Ericsson India [Read Order]
A two member bench of CESTAT has held that liability of the service tax under reverse charge mechanism will arise only w.e.f. 18.04.2006 in case the services are provided by a person located outside...
![Input Tax Credit Can be Claimed on Service Received from a Foreign Service Provider: CESTAT Grants Relief to Ericsson India [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/CESTAT-CESTAT-Chandigarh-Input-Tax-Credit-Ericsson-India-Tax-Case-Service-from-Foreign-Service-Provider-CESTAT-Decision-on-Ericsson-India-Tax-News-TAXSCAN.jpg "Input Tax Credit Can be Claimed on Service Received from a Foreign Service Provider: CESTAT Grants Relief to Ericsson India [Read Order]")
No Service Tax on Providing Services of Sale And Purchase of SIM Cards on Behalf of BSNL: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT) has held that no service tax is leviable for providing services of sale and purchase of SIM cards. The...
![No Service Tax on Providing Services of Sale And Purchase of SIM Cards on Behalf of BSNL: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/No-Service-Tax-Service-Tax-Services-of-Sale-And-Purchase-SIM-Cards-BSNL-CESTAT-taxscan.jpg "No Service Tax on Providing Services of Sale And Purchase of SIM Cards on Behalf of BSNL: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Rejection of Excise Duty Refund claim deposited under Protest is liable to be Refunded: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), observed that the rejection of excise duty refund claim deposited under protest is liable to be refunded. ...
![Rejection of Excise Duty Refund claim deposited under Protest is liable to be Refunded: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Rejection-Excise-Duty-Refund-claim-Protest-Refunded-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Rejection of Excise Duty Refund claim deposited under Protest is liable to be Refunded: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Benefit of SVLDR Scheme cannot be denied just because of Non Filing of Declaration: CESTAT [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal(CESTAT) observed that the benefit of the Sabka Vishwas Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme (SVLDR) scheme cannot be denied...
![Benefit of SVLDR Scheme cannot be denied just because of Non Filing of Declaration: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Benefit-SVLDR-Scheme-denied-Non-Filing-Declaration-CESTAT-TAXSCAN.webp "Benefit of SVLDR Scheme cannot be denied just because of Non Filing of Declaration: CESTAT [Read Order]")