![Taxpayer Mistakenly Labeled ₹21,28,710 as Commission Expenses Instead of Construction Expenses: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Income-Tax-ITAT-ITAT-Pune-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-TAXSCAN.jpg "Taxpayer Mistakenly Labeled ₹21,28,710 as Commission Expenses Instead of Construction Expenses: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]")
Taxpayer Mistakenly Labeled ₹21,28,710 as Commission Expenses Instead of Construction Expenses: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) deleted an addition of Rs. 21,28,710 made by the Assessing Officer due to the taxpayer’s...
![ITAT deletes Rs.1 Cr Addition on Sale of Vegetables/Fruits made u/s 68 instead of S. 69 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/ITAT-Sale-of-Vegetables-Fruits-Vegetables-Fruits-Addition-on-Sale-Income-Tax-Act-Section-69-of-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "ITAT deletes Rs.1 Cr Addition on Sale of Vegetables/Fruits made u/s 68 instead of S. 69 of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
![Validity of Reopening u/s 148 for Verification Purposes: ITAT quashes Reopening as Legally Invalid [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITATDelhi-section-148-of-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-ITAT-Quashes-Reopening-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-taxscan.jpg "Validity of Reopening u/s 148 for Verification Purposes: ITAT quashes Reopening as Legally Invalid [Read Order]")
![ITAT Intervenes, Directs CIT(A) to Grant Personal Hearing to Assessee via Video Conferencing [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-Intervenes-Directs-CITA-Hearing-to-Assessee-via-Video-Conferencing-ITAT-Grant-Personal-Hearing-Income-Tax-ITAT-Ahmedabad-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Intervenes, Directs CIT(A) to Grant Personal Hearing to Assessee via Video Conferencing [Read Order]")
![Mere Cash Deposit Cannot Be Considered as Income: ITAT Deletes Income Tax Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-Mere-Cash-Deposit-ITAT-Deletes-Income-Tax-Addition-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Dinesh-Chandra-Dudhwala-Assessing-Officer-ITAT-news-Commissioner-of-Income-tax-NFAC-CIT-Taxscan.jpg "Mere Cash Deposit Cannot Be Considered as Income: ITAT Deletes Income Tax Addition u/s 69 [Read Order]")
![Cash Gift from Father and Father-in-Law Not Taxable Under Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT-Delhi-Cash-Gift-Father-and-Father-in-Law-Taxable-Under-Income-Tax-Act-taxscan.jpg "Cash Gift from Father and Father-in-Law Not Taxable Under Income Tax Act: ITAT [Read Order]")
Reassessment of Alleged Bogus LTCG/STCG Based on AO's Assumptions u/s 143(3) of Income Tax: ITAT remands case to CIT(A)
In a recent case, the Ranchi bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that mere allegations of fake transactions cannot be the basis of further judicial proceedings. If any allegation...
ITAT orders Condonation of 1809-Day Delay in FTC Disallowance Appeal After Verification of Form 67 [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) passed a decision to condone a delay of 1809 days in a matter regarding disallowance of Foreign Tax Credit ( FTC ), while also...
![ITAT orders Condonation of 1809-Day Delay in FTC Disallowance Appeal After Verification of Form 67 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Bangalore-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Income-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT orders Condonation of 1809-Day Delay in FTC Disallowance Appeal After Verification of Form 67 [Read Order]")
ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A) Order for Failure to Provide Fair Hearing, Remands for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) set aside the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)], due to failure to provide a fair hearing to the assessee...
![ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A) Order for Failure to Provide Fair Hearing, Remands for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/ITAT-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Income-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpeg "ITAT Sets Aside CIT(A) Order for Failure to Provide Fair Hearing, Remands for Fresh Adjudication [Read Order]")
ITAT upholds CIT(A) decision, Rejects Revenue's Claim of Rs.8.77 Crore Income Understatement, Confirms Booking Advances, Not Consultancy Fees [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) upheld the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)], rejecting the Revenue's claim of Rs. 8.77 Crore income...
![ITAT upholds CIT(A) decision, Rejects Revenues Claim of Rs.8.77 Crore Income Understatement, Confirms Booking Advances, Not Consultancy Fees [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/ITAT-Income-Tax-ITAT-Ahmedabad-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT upholds CIT(A) decision, Rejects Revenues Claim of Rs.8.77 Crore Income Understatement, Confirms Booking Advances, Not Consultancy Fees [Read Order]")
ITAT Rejects Revenue's Rs. 39.52 Lakh Overstatement of purchase claim, upholds CIT(A) Ruling due to GST Period Difference [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal( ITAT ) rejected the Revenue’s claim of Rs. 39.52 lakh overstatement of purchases, upholding the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)[CIT(A)]...
![ITAT Rejects Revenues Rs. 39.52 Lakh Overstatement of purchase claim, upholds CIT(A) Ruling due to GST Period Difference [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/ITAT-Ahmedabad-Overstatement-of-Purchase-Claim-GST-Period-Difference-CITA-Ruling-ITAT-GST-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Goods-and-Service-Tax-Commissioner-of-Income-Tax-CITA-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Rejects Revenues Rs. 39.52 Lakh Overstatement of purchase claim, upholds CIT(A) Ruling due to GST Period Difference [Read Order]")
Dismissal of Appeal by CIT(A) even after submitting sufficient reasons: ITAT Condones Delay and Restores Matter to CIT(A) [Read order]
The Delhi Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) Condoned the delay and restored the Matter to Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] as sufficient reasons were submitted by AVA Resources...
![Dismissal of Appeal by CIT(A) even after submitting sufficient reasons: ITAT Condones Delay and Restores Matter to CIT(A) [Read order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/11/Income-Tax-ITAT-ITAT-Delhi-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-ITAT-Condones-Delay-TAXSCAN.jpg "Dismissal of Appeal by CIT(A) even after submitting sufficient reasons: ITAT Condones Delay and Restores Matter to CIT(A) [Read order]")