![‘CERSAI Registration Enough to Claim Secured Creditor Status Under IBC; RoC Non-Registration Not Fatal’: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/21/500x300_2066901-cersai-registration.webp "‘CERSAI Registration Enough to Claim Secured Creditor Status Under IBC; RoC Non-Registration Not Fatal’: NCLAT [Read Order]")
‘CERSAI Registration Enough to Claim Secured Creditor Status Under IBC; RoC Non-Registration Not Fatal’: NCLAT [Read Order]
The Delhi bench of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that CERSAI registration was enough to claim secured creditor status...
![NCLAT Rejects Financial Creditor Claim as No Valid Guarantee Was Executed or Invoked Under IBC [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/250x150_2063738-nclat-ibc-financial-creditor-taxscan.webp "NCLAT Rejects Financial Creditor Claim as No Valid Guarantee Was Executed or Invoked Under IBC [Read Order]")
![NCLAT Rejects Appellant’s Corporate Guarantee Claim as Time-Barred, Holds 388-Day Delay Violates IBC S.12 [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/14/250x150_2063724-no-appeal-under-section-61-filed-against-an-order-nclat-not-covered-by-part-ii-of-i-b-code-part-ii-of-i-b-code-taxscan-2.webp "NCLAT Rejects Appellant’s Corporate Guarantee Claim as Time-Barred, Holds 388-Day Delay Violates IBC S.12 [Read Order]")
![S. 238 of IBC cannot Override PMLA in Cases Involving Proceeds of Crime: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/12/250x150_2063032-ibc-vs-pmla.webp "S. 238 of IBC cannot Override PMLA in Cases Involving Proceeds of Crime: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Issuance of Demand Notice on Registered Email Address of Corporate Debtor is Sufficient u/s 8 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) New Delhi bench has ruled that the corporate debtor's registered email address, as shown in the Company Master Data, can be used to receive a...
![Issuance of Demand Notice on Registered Email Address of Corporate Debtor is Sufficient u/s 8 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/Demand-notice-NCLAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Issuance of Demand Notice on Registered Email Address of Corporate Debtor is Sufficient u/s 8 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
NCLAT Finds Insolvency Plea Within Limitation Citing Debt Acknowledgment and COVID Exclusion [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal(NCLAT) found the insolvency plea filed by Respondent No. 1 to be within the limitation period, citing debt acknowledgment and COVID-19...
![NCLAT Finds Insolvency Plea Within Limitation Citing Debt Acknowledgment and COVID Exclusion [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/NCLAT-Insolvency-Plea-COVID-Exclusion-TAXSCAN.jpg "NCLAT Finds Insolvency Plea Within Limitation Citing Debt Acknowledgment and COVID Exclusion [Read Order]")
CoC Abstention from Voting on Resolution Plan Leads to Liquidation: NCLAT Upholds NCLT’s Decision [Read Order]
The Delhi Bench of National Company Law Appellate Tribunal(NCLAT)upheld the National Company Law Tribunal(NCLT)’s decision to approve liquidation for Sintex Plastics Technologies Ltd. following the...
![CoC Abstention from Voting on Resolution Plan Leads to Liquidation: NCLAT Upholds NCLT’s Decision [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/CoC-Abstention-Voting-Resolution-Plan-Leads-Liquidation-NCLAT-NCLTs-Decision-taxscan.jpg "CoC Abstention from Voting on Resolution Plan Leads to Liquidation: NCLAT Upholds NCLT’s Decision [Read Order]")
Approved Resolution Plan Cannot be Reopened based on Belatedly agitated Claims: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi dismissed the appeals filed under Section 61 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 due to failure of appellant to exercise due...
![Approved Resolution Plan Cannot be Reopened based on Belatedly agitated Claims: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Approved-Resolution-Plan-Reopened-Belatedly-Claims-NCLAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Approved Resolution Plan Cannot be Reopened based on Belatedly agitated Claims: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Existence of Financial Debt and Corresponding Default is a Sine Qua Non for Initiating Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, upheld the adjudicating authority's ruling and dismissed a Section 7 petition under the Insolvency Bankruptcy Code...
![Existence of Financial Debt and Corresponding Default is a Sine Qua Non for Initiating Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Existence-of-Financial-Debt-Corresponding-Proceedings-us-7-of-IBC-NCLAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Existence of Financial Debt and Corresponding Default is a Sine Qua Non for Initiating Proceedings u/s 7 of IBC: NCLAT [Read Order]")
Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), New Delhi held that a creditor may be considered a "Secured Creditor" under section 3(30) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by...
![Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/WhatsApp-Image-2025-02-20-at-10.40.51-AM.jpeg "Non-Registration of “Charge” u/s 77 of Companies Act does not remove “Secured Creditor” Under IBC during CIRP: NCLAT [Read Order]")