![Judgment of Civil Court is Binding on Criminal Court to prove Legally Enforceable Debt u/s 138 of NI Act: AP HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Judgment-of-Civil-Court-Binding-on-Criminal-Court-Enforceable-Debt-NI-Act-AP-HC-taxscan.jpg "Judgment of Civil Court is Binding on Criminal Court to prove Legally Enforceable Debt u/s 138 of NI Act: AP HC [Read Order]")
Judgment of Civil Court is Binding on Criminal Court to prove Legally Enforceable Debt u/s 138 of NI Act: AP HC [Read Order]
The Andhra Pradesh High Court ruled that the judgment of the civil court is binding on criminal court to prove legally enforceable debt under Section...
![Misreading of Evidence by Magistrate: Calcutta HC sets aside Order of Acquittal in S. 138 NI Act Case [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Misreading-Evidence-Magistrate-aside-Order-Acquittal-NI-Act-Case-Directing-respondent-surrender-taxscan.jpg "Misreading of Evidence by Magistrate: Calcutta HC sets aside Order of Acquittal in S. 138 NI Act Case [Read Order]")
![Cheque “Drawer” does not Include Authorised Signatory of Company u/s 143A of NI Act: Bombay HC directs not to Pay Interim Compensation [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Cheque-Drawer-Authorised-Signatory-of-Company-NI-Act-Bombay-Highcourt-Interim-Compensation-taxscan.jpg "Cheque “Drawer” does not Include Authorised Signatory of Company u/s 143A of NI Act: Bombay HC directs not to Pay Interim Compensation [Read Order]")
Complainant does not have Financial Capacity: Supreme Court acquits S.138 NI Act accused based on ITRs of Complainant [Read Order]
A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court recently disposed a 10 year old case, wherein conviction of the accused for dishonour of cheque as per Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was...
![Complainant does not have Financial Capacity: Supreme Court acquits S.138 NI Act accused based on ITRs of Complainant [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Supreme-Court-NI-Act-accused-ITRs-Income-Tax-Returns-ITRs-of-Complainant-taxscan.jpg "Complainant does not have Financial Capacity: Supreme Court acquits S.138 NI Act accused based on ITRs of Complainant [Read Order]")
Violation of 269SS does not nullify Transaction in S.138 NI Act Case, but constitutes a Separate Offence under IT Act: Karnataka HC [Read Order]
A Single Bench of the Karnataka High Court has recently held that, transactions of more than Rs.20000/- in cash, does not vitiate the proceedings under Section 138 Of the Negotiable Instruments...
![Violation of 269SS does not nullify Transaction in S.138 NI Act Case, but constitutes a Separate Offence under IT Act: Karnataka HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Violation-of-269SS-Transaction-in-S.138-NI-Act-Case-Offence-under-IT-Act-Karnataka-HighCourt-taxscan.jpg "Violation of 269SS does not nullify Transaction in S.138 NI Act Case, but constitutes a Separate Offence under IT Act: Karnataka HC [Read Order]")
High Court is solely empowered to hear appeal against acquittal Cheque Bounce case: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court ruled that the High Court is solely empowered to hear appeal against acquittal Cheque Bounce case. A Single Bench of the High Court consisting of Justice Subhendu Samanta...
![High Court is solely empowered to hear appeal against acquittal Cheque Bounce case: Calcutta HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/appeal-Cheque-Bounce-case-Calcutta-HC.jpg "High Court is solely empowered to hear appeal against acquittal Cheque Bounce case: Calcutta HC [Read Order]")
Violation of 269SS of Income Tax Act is a Separate Offence, Proceedings for Cheque Dishonour u/s 138 NI Act cannot be Disturbed: Delhi Court [Read Order]
The Delhi Metropolitan Magistrate (Negotiable Instruments) Court of Magistrate Divya Arora has recently held that the violation of Section 269SS of the Income Tax Act, 1961 does not disturb the...
![Violation of 269SS of Income Tax Act is a Separate Offence, Proceedings for Cheque Dishonour u/s 138 NI Act cannot be Disturbed: Delhi Court [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Violation-of-269SS-of-Income-Tax-Act-Proceedings-for-Cheque-Dishonour-us-138-NI-Act-Delhi-Court-Taxscan.jpg "Violation of 269SS of Income Tax Act is a Separate Offence, Proceedings for Cheque Dishonour u/s 138 NI Act cannot be Disturbed: Delhi Court [Read Order]")
![Interim Compensation in Cheque Default Cases is not Mandatory: Bombay HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Interim-Compensation-Cheque-Default-Cases-Bombay-HC-taxscan.jpg "Interim Compensation in Cheque Default Cases is not Mandatory: Bombay HC [Read Order]")
Vicarious Liability under Negotiable Instruments Act arises only to the person who was in Charge of Business while the Offence committed: Supreme Court sets aside Order of Conviction [Read Judgment]
The Supreme Court has quashed the Chhattisgarh High Court order as the vicarious liability under the Negotiable Instrument Act arises only to the person who was in charge of business while the...
