![Assessee’s Non-Compliance before AO & CIT(A): ITAT slaps ₹5,000 Costs and Remands ₹3.2 Cr Income Tax Addition, ₹1.07 Cr Penalty Issue [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/07/23/500x300_2068072-income-tax-addition-penalty-issue-taxscan.webp "Assessee’s Non-Compliance before AO & CIT(A): ITAT slaps ₹5,000 Costs and Remands ₹3.2 Cr Income Tax Addition, ₹1.07 Cr Penalty Issue [Read Order]")
Assessee’s Non-Compliance before AO & CIT(A): ITAT slaps ₹5,000 Costs and Remands ₹3.2 Cr Income Tax Addition, ₹1.07 Cr Penalty Issue [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has remanded a matter back to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ( CIT(A) )...
![Challenge on Non-Compliance of Formalities of Taking Approval of Specified Authority u/s 151(ii) of Income Tax Act: Calcutta HC dismisses Petition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Income-Tax-Income-Tax-Act-Calcutta-HC-Non-Compliance-Approval-of-Specified-Authority-calcutta-hc-news-Petition-Calcutta-HC-Dismisses-Petition-taxscan.jpg "Challenge on Non-Compliance of Formalities of Taking Approval of Specified Authority u/s 151(ii) of Income Tax Act: Calcutta HC dismisses Petition [Read Order]")
MCA Fines Company and Directors Rs. 2 Cr for Failing to Provide Payment Details and Information of Forfeiture of Shares, Violating 42(6) Forfeiture of Shares [Read Order]
The Ministry of Corporate Affairs ( MCA ) imposed fine on the dealer of TATA commercial Vehicles M/s Excel vehicles Private Limited and its directors with Rs. 2 crores for failing to submit the mode...
Non-Compliance of Conditions for Export of Banned Non Basmati White Rice: Delhi HC dismisses Writ Petition [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court upheld the decision of the single bench holding that the exporter cannot be permitted to export banned non- basmati white rice, due to the non-fulfilment of the conditions...
Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) can't be imposed if Assessee Proves that there was a Reasonable Cause for Non-Compliance of Notice: ITAT [Read Order]
The Jaipur bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the penalty under Section 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 cannot be imposed if the assessee proves that there was a...
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) cant be imposed if Assessee Proves that there was a Reasonable Cause for Non-Compliance of Notice: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Penalty-Assessee-Proves-Reasonable-Cause-Non-Compliance-Notice-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) cant be imposed if Assessee Proves that there was a Reasonable Cause for Non-Compliance of Notice: ITAT [Read Order]")
Non-Compliance behavior of assessee before Lower Authorities during Appellate Proceedings: ITAT directs to deposit  cost of Rs 25,000/- In PM relief Fund [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai bench directed to deposit cost of Rs 25,000/- in Prime Minister Relief Fund (PMRF) due to non-compliance behavior of assessee before lower authorities...
![Non-Compliance behavior of assessee before Lower Authorities during Appellate Proceedings: ITAT directs to deposit  cost of Rs 25,000/- In PM relief Fund [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Non-Compliance-behavior-Lower-Authorities-Appellate-Proceedings-ITAT-PM-relief-Fund-taxscan.jpg "Non-Compliance behavior of assessee before Lower Authorities during Appellate Proceedings: ITAT directs to deposit  cost of Rs 25,000/- In PM relief Fund [Read Order]")
Repetition of Addition by AO Without Verification and Non-Compliance to Order of Tribunal: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]
The Indore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), held that instead of conducting any verification in compliance of the direction of the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer has made straight away...
![Repetition of Addition by AO Without Verification and Non-Compliance to Order of Tribunal: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Repetition-of-Addition-Addition-Income-Tax-Addition-Repetition-of-Addition-by-AO-AO-Non-Compliance-to-Order-Verification-ITAT-deletes-Addition-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Repetition of Addition by AO Without Verification and Non-Compliance to Order of Tribunal: ITAT deletes Addition [Read Order]")
Non-Compliance of Taking Approval of Specified Authority Mentioned u/S 151(ii): Calcutta HC quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court quashed the assessment order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 since it was passed without taking approval of the specified authority mentioned under Section...
![Non-Compliance of Taking Approval of Specified Authority Mentioned u/S 151(ii): Calcutta HC quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Non-Compliance-of-Taking-Approval-Approval-Specified-Authority-Calcutta-High-Court-Assessment-Order-Assessment-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Compliance of Taking Approval of Specified Authority Mentioned u/S 151(ii): Calcutta HC quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]")
Appeal via Electronic Mode is Procedural Requirement, Non-Compliance cannot be Hindrance to Justice: ITAT [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) held that non-compliance of appeal via electronic mode cannot be a hindrance to justice as it was a procedural requirement. Shri...
![Appeal via Electronic Mode is Procedural Requirement, Non-Compliance cannot be Hindrance to Justice: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Appeal-Electronic-Mode-Non-Compliance-Justice-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Appeal via Electronic Mode is Procedural Requirement, Non-Compliance cannot be Hindrance to Justice: ITAT [Read Order]")