![Allegation based on Mere Suspicion “Violates Natural Justice and Manifestation Of Arbitrariness”: CESTAT quashes Notice [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Natural-Justice-and-Manifestation-Of-Arbitrariness-CESTAT-Notice-taxscan.jpg "Allegation based on Mere Suspicion “Violates Natural Justice and Manifestation Of Arbitrariness”: CESTAT quashes Notice [Read Order]")
Allegation based on Mere Suspicion “Violates Natural Justice and Manifestation Of Arbitrariness”: CESTAT quashes Notice [Read Order]
The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) quashed notice on the ground that allegation based on mere...
![Circulars, though binding on the Department, is not so on the Tribunal: CESTAT Quashes Notice Against DCM Hyundai [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Circulars-Department-Tribunal-CESTAT-Notice-DCM-Hyundai-TAXSCAN.jpg "Circulars, though binding on the Department, is not so on the Tribunal: CESTAT Quashes Notice Against DCM Hyundai [Read Order]")
![ITAT order Jet Airways to pay cost of Rs 25,000 to PM Relief Fund due to Fail to comply with Notice issue by IT department [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/ITAT-Jet-Airways-Fund-Notice-IT-department-TAXSCAN.jpg "ITAT order Jet Airways to pay cost of Rs 25,000 to PM Relief Fund due to Fail to comply with Notice issue by IT department [Read Order]")
![No change of law and No new material on record: Bombay HC quashes Notice u/s 148 [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/law-Bombay-High-Court-Notice-taxscan.jpg "No change of law and No new material on record: Bombay HC quashes Notice u/s 148 [Read Order]")
Non-Compliance of Notice and Non-Submission of Details: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 927 Days in filing of Appeal [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ), Kolkata Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, refused to condone the delay of 927 days in the filing of appeal, on the ground of non-...
![Non-Compliance of Notice and Non-Submission of Details: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 927 Days in filing of Appeal [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Condone-Delay-Notice-ITAT-Appeal-filing-of-Appeal-Income-Tax-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Non-Compliance of Notice and Non-Submission of Details: ITAT Refuses to Condone Delay of 927 Days in filing of Appeal [Read Order]")
Mere Appearance of staff of person in Judicial Custody should not be taken as appearance by Assessee himself in absence of Valid Notice: Orissa HC [Read Order]
In a major decision the Orissa High Court observed that mere appearance of staff of person in judicial custody should not be taken as appearance by assessee himself in absence of valid notice ...
![Mere Appearance of staff of person in Judicial Custody should not be taken as appearance by Assessee himself in absence of Valid Notice: Orissa HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Appearance-of-staff-Judicial-Custody-Assessee-Notice-Orissa-High-Court-Orissa-HC-taxscan.jpg "Mere Appearance of staff of person in Judicial Custody should not be taken as appearance by Assessee himself in absence of Valid Notice: Orissa HC [Read Order]")
![Bombay HC quashes Re-Assessment Notice citing jurisdictional errors by AO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Bombay-High-Court-Re-Assessment-Notice-Re-Assessment-Notice-jurisdictional-errors-taxscan.jpg "Bombay HC quashes Re-Assessment Notice citing jurisdictional errors by AO [Read Order]")
Delhi HC Stays order u/s 148A(d) and Consequential Notice as AO committed Error in Law in Framing Initial Assessment [Read Order]
The Division Bench of Delhi High Court has stayed order under Section 148A(d) and consequential notice finding that the Assessing Officer had committed error in law in framing initial assessment. ...
Contravention of general directions issued by Court where Notice u/s 148 for Reopening Assessment: Bombay HC remands matter to AO [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court remanded back matter to Assessing Officer (AO) as there was contravention of general directions issued by Court where notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for...
![Contravention of general directions issued by Court where Notice u/s 148 for Reopening Assessment: Bombay HC remands matter to AO [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Bombay-High-Court-Bombay-HC-High-Court-Notice-Reopening-Assessment-Assessing-Officer-AO-taxscan-.jpg "Contravention of general directions issued by Court where Notice u/s 148 for Reopening Assessment: Bombay HC remands matter to AO [Read Order]")
Notice issued Without satisfy Condition Precedent u/s 147 of IT ACT is invalid :Bombay HC quashes proceedings [Read Order]
The division bench of the Bombay high court in a writ petition filed before it quashed the reopening assessment proceedings and held that Notice issued without satisfied condition precedent under...
