![Notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act lacks Jurisdiction: ITAT set aside Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Notice-IncomeTax-Income-Tax-Act-jurisdiction-ITAT-assessment-order-taxscan.jpg "Notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act lacks Jurisdiction: ITAT set aside Assessment Order [Read Order]")
Notice issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act lacks Jurisdiction: ITAT set aside Assessment Order [Read Order]
The Mumbai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) while set-aside the assessment order passed by the assessing officer (AO) held that, notice...
![Relief to Milton Plastics: Bombay HC quashes Re Assessment Notice in absence of material for basis for Assumption of Jurisdiction [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Milton-Plastics-Re-Assessment-Notice-Assumption-Jurisdiction-TAXSCAN.jpg "Relief to Milton Plastics: Bombay HC quashes Re Assessment Notice in absence of material for basis for Assumption of Jurisdiction [Read Order]")
![Date of Panchnama Last Drawn is Starting Point of Limitation of Two Years for Completing Block Assessment Proceedings: SC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Date-of-Panchnama-Starting-Point-Limitation-Block-Assessment-Proceedings-Assessment-Proceedings-Supreme-court-Taxscan.jpg "Date of Panchnama Last Drawn is Starting Point of Limitation of Two Years for Completing Block Assessment Proceedings: SC [Read Order]")
![Inappropriate Words Not Deleted in Penalty Notice: ITAT quashes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Inappropriate-Words-Deleted-Penalty-Notice-ITAT-TAXSCAN.jpg "Inappropriate Words Not Deleted in Penalty Notice: ITAT quashes Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) [Read Order]")
Accountant of Firm cannot be Considered as Representative of Taxable Person u/s 169(1)(a) GST Act: Allahabad HC quashes Notice Served [Read Order]
The notice served was invalidated by a panel of the Allahabad High Court presided over by Justice Pankaj Bhatia because it was not served in accordance with law. It was determined that the notice was...
![Accountant of Firm cannot be Considered as Representative of Taxable Person u/s 169(1)(a) GST Act: Allahabad HC quashes Notice Served [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Accountant-Taxable-GST-Act-GST-Allahabad-High-Court-Notice-Taxscan.jpg "Accountant of Firm cannot be Considered as Representative of Taxable Person u/s 169(1)(a) GST Act: Allahabad HC quashes Notice Served [Read Order]")
Failure to Serve Notice for Personal Hearing invalidates the Order Confirming Demand u/s 73(2) of the Finance Act: Telangana HC [Read Order]
The Telangana High Court has held that failure to serve notice for a personal hearing invalidates the order confirming demand under Section 73(2) of the Finance Act, 1994. The petitioner...
![Income Tax Notice issued u/s 148A(b) on dissolved Partnership is not valid: Delhi HCÂ [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Income-Tax-Notice-Income-Tax-Notice-Partnership-Delhi-High-Court-taxscan.jpg "Income Tax Notice issued u/s 148A(b) on dissolved Partnership is not valid: Delhi HCÂ [Read Order]")
![Initiating Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act without Valid Notice is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-Notice-ITAT-Taxscan.jpg "Initiating Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act without Valid Notice is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
Notice u/s 148 issued to a Non-Existing Company Despite having Knowledge about Amalgamation is not valid: Calcutta HC [Read Order]
In a recent judgement, the Calcutta High Court (HC) has held thata notice under 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 issued to a non-existing company despite having knowledge about its amalgamation is not...
No proposal in Pre-Assessment Notice for levy of interest or Penalty: Madras HC quashes Assessment Order [Read Order]
The Madras High Court quashed an assessment order on the ground that there was no proposal in pre-assessment notice for levy of interest or penalty. The writ petitioner is K.Baskaran. The writ...
