![Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1) of Income Tax Act cant be made without Proper Record of Satisfaction: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Imposition-Penalty-Imposition-of-Penalty-Income-Tax-Act-ITAT.jpg "Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1) of Income Tax Act cant be made without Proper Record of Satisfaction: ITAT [Read Order]")
Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1) of Income Tax Act can't be made without Proper Record of Satisfaction: ITAT [Read Order]
The Hyderabad bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the imposition of the penalty under Section 271(1) of the Income Tax Act,...
![Excess Stocks should Represent Income from Undisclosed Sources: Orissa HC Dismisses Appeal by Income Tax Department [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Excess-Stocks-Represent-Income-Undisclosed-Sources-Orissa-HC-Appeal-Income-Tax-Department-TAXSCAN.jpg "Excess Stocks should Represent Income from Undisclosed Sources: Orissa HC Dismisses Appeal by Income Tax Department [Read Order]")
![AO Must Verify Source of Cash Deposits Made During Demonetization Period: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/AO-Verify-Source-Cash-Deposits-Demonetization-Period-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "AO Must Verify Source of Cash Deposits Made During Demonetization Period: ITAT [Read Order]")
![AO rightly takes Approval from PCIT for Reassessment not Elapsed more than 3 years: Calcutta HC upholds addition [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/AO-Approval-Approval-from-PCIT-PCIT-PCIT-for-Reassessment-Reassessment-Elapsed-Calcutta-HC-upholds-addition-Calcutta-High-Court-addition-taxscan.jpg "AO rightly takes Approval from PCIT for Reassessment not Elapsed more than 3 years: Calcutta HC upholds addition [Read Order]")
Power of Attorney should be verified in Sale of an Inherent Property: ITAT sets aside the Assessment Order [Read Order]
The Chennai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the power of attorney should be verified in the sale of an inherent property. The assessee is a housewife earning income...
![Power of Attorney should be verified in Sale of an Inherent Property: ITAT sets aside the Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Power-Attorney-verified-Sale-Inherent-Property-ITAT-Assessment-Order-TAXSCAN.jpg "Power of Attorney should be verified in Sale of an Inherent Property: ITAT sets aside the Assessment Order [Read Order]")
PCIT wrongly invokes Revisionary Powers u/s 263 of IT Act on order issued by AO with Sufficient Enquiry: ITAT revives Assessment Order [Read Order]
The Chandigarh Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) recently revived the assessment order and held that it was not justified for the PCIT to invoke the revisionary powers under Section...
![PCIT wrongly invokes Revisionary Powers u/s 263 of IT Act on order issued by AO with Sufficient Enquiry: ITAT revives Assessment Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Assessment-Order-PCIT-Revisionary-Powers-IT-Act-Income-Tax-AO-Sufficient-Enquiry-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "PCIT wrongly invokes Revisionary Powers u/s 263 of IT Act on order issued by AO with Sufficient Enquiry: ITAT revives Assessment Order [Read Order]")
Claim of Deduction on Freight Outward Expenses Allowable only on Submission of Actual Payment Details: ITAT [Read Order]
The Pune Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that claim of deduction on freight outward expenses would be allowable only on submission of actual payment details. The AO...
![Claim of Deduction on Freight Outward Expenses Allowable only on Submission of Actual Payment Details: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/Claim-of-Deduction-Deduction-Freight-Outward-Expenses-Expenses-Actual-Payment-Details-Submission-of-Actual-Payment-Details-ITAT-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "Claim of Deduction on Freight Outward Expenses Allowable only on Submission of Actual Payment Details: ITAT [Read Order]")
No adverse Inference Drawn against Assessee: Calcutta HC notes that PCIT could not have Ignored Order u/s 153A as Immaterial and Irrelevant [Read Order]
The Calcutta High Court noted that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) could not have ignored order under Section 153A of the Income Tax Act as immaterial and irrelevant as no adverse...
![No adverse Inference Drawn against Assessee: Calcutta HC notes that PCIT could not have Ignored Order u/s 153A as Immaterial and Irrelevant [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Calcutta-High-Court-PCIT-immaterial-Irrelevant-Taxscan.jpg "No adverse Inference Drawn against Assessee: Calcutta HC notes that PCIT could not have Ignored Order u/s 153A as Immaterial and Irrelevant [Read Order]")
Order cannot be treated as “Erroneous” If PCIT thinks that “the Order should have been Written More Elaborately”: ITAT Quashes Revision [Read Order]
The Surat Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed the revision order holding that the order could not be treated as erroneous if the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) had...
![Order cannot be treated as “Erroneous” If PCIT thinks that “the Order should have been Written More Elaborately”: ITAT Quashes Revision [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Order-Erroneous-PCIT-ITAT-Revision-Income-Tax-Taxscan.jpg "Order cannot be treated as “Erroneous” If PCIT thinks that “the Order should have been Written More Elaborately”: ITAT Quashes Revision [Read Order]")
Revisional Power cannot be Invoked When AO Adopted A Plausible View that resulted in Loss of Revenue But the Same is Not Unsustainable in Law: ITAT
The Surat Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the revisional power could not be invoked when the assessing officer had adopted a plausible view resulting in loss of revenue...
AO failed to Conduct Investigation regarding Cash Deposits during Demonetization Period: ITAT Upholds Revision Order [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the revision order observing that the Assessing Officer (AO) had failed to conduct investigation regarding cash deposits...
![AO failed to Conduct Investigation regarding Cash Deposits during Demonetization Period: ITAT Upholds Revision Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/AO-Investigation-Cash-Deposits-Demonetization-Period-ITAT-Revision-Order-Taxscan.jpg "AO failed to Conduct Investigation regarding Cash Deposits during Demonetization Period: ITAT Upholds Revision Order [Read Order]")