Fake ‘Penalty Notice’ Emails Target Indian Taxpayers Amid Rising e-PAN Phishing Scams
Tахpаyers аcrоss Indiа аre fаcing а new wаve оf рhishing аttempts, with emаils fаlsеly сlаiming tо be pеnаlty nоtices frоm thе Incоme Tаx Depаrtment....
![ITAT quashes Final Assessment Order Passed Without Draft Order, terms it Void ab Initio [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Draft-Order-Delhi-ITAT-Assessment-Order-taxscan.jpg "ITAT quashes Final Assessment Order Passed Without Draft Order, terms it Void ab Initio [Read Order]")
![An Omnibus Notice suffers from vice of vagueness’: ITAT invalidates Ambiguous Penalty Notice u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/An-Omnibus-Notice-vice-of-vagueness-ITAT-Ambiguous-Penalty-Notice-Income-Tax-taxscan.jpg "An Omnibus Notice suffers from vice of vagueness’: ITAT invalidates Ambiguous Penalty Notice u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax [Read Order]")
Notices communicated to E-mail ID created by Former Accountant: Karnataka HC Returns Case to S. 148A(b) Stage [Read Order]
In a recent ruling, the Karnataka High Court remits the case back to the Section 148A(b) stage as the income tax notices are being sent to an outdated email address created by the former accountant...
140-Day Delay in Filing Appeal before CIT(A) due to wrong Tax Consultant Advice: ITAT condones Delay [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) condoned a 140-day delay in filing an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] due to the appellant's...
![140-Day Delay in Filing Appeal before CIT(A) due to wrong Tax Consultant Advice: ITAT condones Delay [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/ITAT-ITAT-bangalore-Delay-in-Filing-Appeal-Income-Tax-Appellate-Tribunal-Wrong-Tax-Consultant-Advice-taxscan.jpg "140-Day Delay in Filing Appeal before CIT(A) due to wrong Tax Consultant Advice: ITAT condones Delay [Read Order]")
Penalty Notice issued without deleting or striking off inapplicable part: ITAT Deletes Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]
Mumbai bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), while deleting the penalty levied under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the bench held that penalty notice was issued...
![Penalty Notice issued without deleting or striking off inapplicable part: ITAT Deletes Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/itat-mumbai-ITAT-Penalty-Deletion-Inapplicable-Penalty-Notice-Incorrect-Penalty-Notice-Deletion-ITAT-Decisions-on-Tax-Penalties-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty Notice issued without deleting or striking off inapplicable part: ITAT Deletes Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act [Read Order]")
Interim Relief to Paypal: Bombay HC stays Rs. 32.39 Crore time barred Income Tax Demand [Read Order]
The Bombay High Court has issued an ad-interim order, staying the enforcement of a substantial tax demand amounting to Rs. 32.39 crore and all associated proceedings against PayPal Payments Private...
Penalty Notice Issued u/s 274 of Income Tax Act not Specifying Charge against Assessee is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]
The Mumbai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that show cause notice issued by the Assessing Officer (AO) under Section 274 read with Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act,1961 is...
![Penalty Notice Issued u/s 274 of Income Tax Act not Specifying Charge against Assessee is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/08/Penalty-Notice-Income-Tax-Act-Specifying-Charge-Assessee-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty Notice Issued u/s 274 of Income Tax Act not Specifying Charge against Assessee is Invalid: ITAT [Read Order]")
Penalty Notice u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act Issued in a Stereotyped Manner Without Applying Mind Not Valid: ITAT [Read Order]
Penalty imposed on the assessee was deleted by the Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT ) chaired by Anil Chaturvedi (Accountant member) and N.K. Chaudhry (Judicial Member). The...
![Penalty Notice u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act Issued in a Stereotyped Manner Without Applying Mind Not Valid: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Penalty-Notice-Penalty-Notice-Income-Tax-Act-Income-Tax-Tax-ITAT-taxscan.jpg "Penalty Notice u/s 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act Issued in a Stereotyped Manner Without Applying Mind Not Valid: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Defective Penalty Notice: ITAT grants relief to Ecorea and Kuroda Electric India [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/penalty-notice-ITAT-Ecorea-and-Kuroda-Electric-India-taxscan.jpeg "Defective Penalty Notice: ITAT grants relief to Ecorea and Kuroda Electric India [Read Order]")