Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
![Defect in Statutory Notice in Not Striking Out of Irrelevant Ground Vitiates Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Statutory-Notice-Penalty-Proceedings-ITAT-Penalty-income-tax-taxscan.jpg "Defect in Statutory Notice in Not Striking Out of Irrelevant Ground Vitiates Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]")
Defect in Statutory Notice in Not Striking Out of Irrelevant Ground Vitiates Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Mumbai Bench, has recently, in an appeal filed before it, held that defect in statutory notice in not...
![Mere Ignorance of Law cannot be a Reason to Quash Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Mere-Ignorance-of-Law-Penalty-ITAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Mere Ignorance of Law cannot be a Reason to Quash Penalty Proceedings: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty under Wealth Tax Act can’t be levied without any specific findings: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Penalty-Wealth-Tax-Act-ITAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Penalty under Wealth Tax Act can’t be levied without any specific findings: ITAT [Read Order]")
![Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) not sustainable if reason not specified: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Penalty-proceedings-ITAT-Taxscan.jpeg "Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) not sustainable if reason not specified: ITAT [Read Order]")
Additions towards share capital in question would not ipso facto tantamount to alleged concealment of income: ITAT deletes penalty
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Ahmedabad Bench while deleting the penalty held that the Additions towards share capital in question would not be ipso facto tantamount to alleged...
![CBDT assigns all Penalty cases to National Faceless Penalty Centre [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/CBDT-Penalty-cases-National-Faceless-Penalty-Centre-Taxscan.jpg "CBDT assigns all Penalty cases to National Faceless Penalty Centre [Read Order]")
![Penalty Proceedings shall not survive if Assessment is Debatable: Delhi High Court [Read Judgment]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Penalty-Proceedings-Assessment-is-Debatable-Delhi-High-Court-Taxsan.jpg "Penalty Proceedings shall not survive if Assessment is Debatable: Delhi High Court [Read Judgment]")
![CBDT notifies Setting up of NFAC and RFAC under Faceless Appellate Scheme, 2020 [Read Notification]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/CBDT-Faceless-Assessment-Scheme-Guidelines-Taxscan.jpg "CBDT notifies Setting up of NFAC and RFAC under Faceless Appellate Scheme, 2020 [Read Notification]")
GST: NAA didn’t impose Penalty for denying benefit of ITC for Nestle Munch & Cadbury Dairy Milk as no penalty provisions existed [Read Order]
The National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) found M/s Harish Bakers and Confectioners Private Limited guilty of profiteering but did not impose the penalty for denying the benefit of Input Tax...
![GST: NAA didn’t impose Penalty for denying benefit of ITC for Nestle Munch & Cadbury Dairy Milk as no penalty provisions existed [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/NAA-ITC-Penalty-Nestle-Taxscan.jpg "GST: NAA didn’t impose Penalty for denying benefit of ITC for Nestle Munch & Cadbury Dairy Milk as no penalty provisions existed [Read Order]")
GST: Delhi HC stays Penalty proceedings of 75 Cr. against Patanjali Ayurved by Anti-Profiteering Authority [Read Order]
The Delhi High Court on Friday stayed the penalty proceedings initiated against Patanjali Ayurved for allegedly profiteering Rs 75 crore through sale of its products. The stay was subjected to the...
![GST: Delhi HC stays Penalty proceedings of 75 Cr. against Patanjali Ayurved by Anti-Profiteering Authority [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Patanjali-Ayurved-penalty-proceedings-Taxscan.jpg "GST: Delhi HC stays Penalty proceedings of 75 Cr. against Patanjali Ayurved by Anti-Profiteering Authority [Read Order]")
![Penalty Proceedings can’t be initiated without a specific Charge: ITAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/PAN-Penalty-TAN-Taxscan.jpg "Penalty Proceedings can’t be initiated without a specific Charge: ITAT [Read Order]")