![No Penalty or Redemption Fine if Confiscation of Goods is Set Aside by Customs Tribunal: CESTAT [read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/500x300_2043841-chennai-cestat-no-penalty-cestat-redemption-goods-customs-tribunal-cestat-taxscan-1.webp "No Penalty or Redemption Fine if Confiscation of Goods is Set Aside by Customs Tribunal: CESTAT [read Order]")
No Penalty or Redemption Fine if Confiscation of Goods is Set Aside by Customs Tribunal: CESTAT [read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), while hearing a matter filed by the Commissioner of Customs,...
![Service Tax Demand on Ad Space Sales Pre-2014 Not Sustainable Under Section 66D(g): CESTAT [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/13/250x150_2043609-cestat-service-tax-demand-service-tax-taxscan.webp "Service Tax Demand on Ad Space Sales Pre-2014 Not Sustainable Under Section 66D(g): CESTAT [Read Order]")
![ITAT Deletes Penalty for Non-Filing of Form 15CA as Rules Were Notified Late for Non-Taxable Remittances [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/11/250x150_2042347-itat-itat-surat-form-15-ca-penalty-taxscan.webp "ITAT Deletes Penalty for Non-Filing of Form 15CA as Rules Were Notified Late for Non-Taxable Remittances [Read Order]")
![Incorrect Fabric Label on Reimported Goods: CESTAT Finds No Misdeclaration as Composition Remains Same and Customs Duty Drawback Is Returned [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/11/250x150_2042321-reimported-goods-cestat-taxscan.webp "Incorrect Fabric Label on Reimported Goods: CESTAT Finds No Misdeclaration as Composition Remains Same and Customs Duty Drawback Is Returned [Read Order]")
![CESTAT Upholds Penalty for Misdeclaration and Undervaluation in Import of Glass Chatons, against Importer and Alleged Mastermind [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/09/250x150_2041868-cestat-penalty-misdeclaration-undervaluation-import-glass-chatons-importer-alleged-mastermind-taxscan.webp "CESTAT Upholds Penalty for Misdeclaration and Undervaluation in Import of Glass Chatons, against Importer and Alleged Mastermind [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Based on Estimated Addition: ITAT Deletes Penalty Citing Absence of Concealment [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ( ITAT) deleted the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of Income Tax Act,1961, for the Assessment Year 2008-09, holding that the penalty could...
![Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Based on Estimated Addition: ITAT Deletes Penalty Citing Absence of Concealment [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/09/500x300_2041840-penalty-us-2711c-estimated-itat-penalty-absence-concealment-taxscan.webp "Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Based on Estimated Addition: ITAT Deletes Penalty Citing Absence of Concealment [Read Order]")
Entire Liability Computed from Taxpayer's Records and Returns Filed Before SCN: CESTAT Rules Service Tax Penalty Unjustified [Read Order]
The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) ruled that a service tax penalty is not justified when the entire tax liability was calculated from the...
![Entire Liability Computed from Taxpayers Records and Returns Filed Before SCN: CESTAT Rules Service Tax Penalty Unjustified [Read Order]](https://images.taxscan.in/h-upload/2025/06/09/500x300_2041827-entire-liability-computed-taxpayers-records-returns-filed-scn-cestat-rules-service-tax-penalty-unjustified-taxscan.webp "Entire Liability Computed from Taxpayers Records and Returns Filed Before SCN: CESTAT Rules Service Tax Penalty Unjustified [Read Order]")
![Redemption Fine Not Justified on Re-Exported Goods Due to Suppliers Mistake: CESTAT [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Re-Exported-Goods-1.jpg "Redemption Fine Not Justified on Re-Exported Goods Due to Suppliers Mistake: CESTAT [Read Order]")
Default in the appointment of the whole-time company secretary: MCA imposes 8.92 lakhs on Private Limited Company [Read Order]
In the adjudication order passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Registrar of Companies under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, a total penalty of up to Rs. 8.92 lakh was imposed on...
![Default in the appointment of the whole-time company secretary: MCA imposes 8.92 lakhs on Private Limited Company [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/MCA-imposes-taxscan.jpg "Default in the appointment of the whole-time company secretary: MCA imposes 8.92 lakhs on Private Limited Company [Read Order]")