![Penalty u/s 270A for Misreporting without Proper Charge Specification Invalid: ITAT Deletes Rs. 38.05 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Penalty-Penalty-Section-270A-Misreporting-without-Proper-Charge-Specification-Invalid-Proper-Charge-Specification-taxscan.jpg "Penalty u/s 270A for Misreporting without Proper Charge Specification Invalid: ITAT Deletes Rs. 38.05 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]")
Penalty u/s 270A for Misreporting without Proper Charge Specification Invalid: ITAT Deletes Rs. 38.05 Lakh Penalty [Read Order]
The Bangalore Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)deleted the penalty of Rs. 38.05 lakh imposed on the assessee due to the failure of...
![ITAT Dismisses Department’s Appeal, Upholds 5% Bogus Purchase Addition & Deletes Penalty [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/No-Corroborative-Evidence-Bogus-Purchase-ITAT-Income-Tax-Addition-taxscan.jpg "ITAT Dismisses Department’s Appeal, Upholds 5% Bogus Purchase Addition & Deletes Penalty [Read Order]")
![Failure to file Annual Returns for the FY 2020-21: MCA imposes Penalty of Rs. 5.6 Lakhs on Company and Directors [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Penalty-taxscan.jpg "Failure to file Annual Returns for the FY 2020-21: MCA imposes Penalty of Rs. 5.6 Lakhs on Company and Directors [Read Order]")
![Failure to Address Auditor’s Remarks in Director’s Report: MCA imposes Rs. 4.5 Lakhs Penalty on Company and Directors [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Company-and-Directors-PENALTY-MCA-TAXSCAN.jpg "Failure to Address Auditor’s Remarks in Director’s Report: MCA imposes Rs. 4.5 Lakhs Penalty on Company and Directors [Read Order]")
MCA penalizes Company and Directors for Non-Disclosure of Director Changes in Board Report [Read Order]
In the adjudication passed by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) Registrar of Companies under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, a total penalty of Rs. 3.5 lakhs was imposed on a company...
![MCA penalizes Company and Directors for Non-Disclosure of Director Changes in Board Report [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Chartered-Accountant-Kerala-HC-citing-Technical-Glitches-MCA-Portal-Taxscan.jpg "MCA penalizes Company and Directors for Non-Disclosure of Director Changes in Board Report [Read Order]")
GST Interest & Penalty Not Applicable on Reversed ITCÂ Never Availed or Utilised from Date of Claim of ITC in ECRL: Madras HC [Read Order]
The Madras High Court, in its recent ruling, favoured in favour of petitioner, ruling that the interest and penalty should not be imposed on the reversed input tax credit ( ITC ) under GST (Goods and...
![GST Interest & Penalty Not Applicable on Reversed ITCÂ Never Availed or Utilised from Date of Claim of ITC in ECRL: Madras HC [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/REVERSED-ITC-GST-Interest-Penalty-TAXSCAN.jpg "GST Interest & Penalty Not Applicable on Reversed ITCÂ Never Availed or Utilised from Date of Claim of ITC in ECRL: Madras HC [Read Order]")
GST Authorities Must Draw Samples Before Concluding Goods Misrepresented: Allahabad HC Quashes Detention Order [Read Order]
The GST (Goods and Services Tax) authorities must draw samples before concluding the goods were misrepresented, ruled the Allahabad High Court quashing the detention order. The court noted that the...
![GST Authorities Must Draw Samples Before Concluding Goods Misrepresented: Allahabad HC Quashes Detention Order [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Detention-Order.jpg "GST Authorities Must Draw Samples Before Concluding Goods Misrepresented: Allahabad HC Quashes Detention Order [Read Order]")
Assessment Issued in Name of Deceased Invalid: ITAT Remands Rs. 18.47 Cr addition for fresh adjudication [Read Order]
The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) remanded the matter back to the Assessing Officer (AO) for fresh adjudication in a case where an assessment order was issued in the...
![Assessment Issued in Name of Deceased Invalid: ITAT Remands Rs. 18.47 Cr addition for fresh adjudication [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Assessment-Documents.jpg "Assessment Issued in Name of Deceased Invalid: ITAT Remands Rs. 18.47 Cr addition for fresh adjudication [Read Order]")
![ITAT quashes CIT(A)’s Ex Parte Penalty Orders Due to Wrong Email Service [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Wrong-Email-Service.jpg "ITAT quashes CIT(A)’s Ex Parte Penalty Orders Due to Wrong Email Service [Read Order]")
Importer Aware of IEC Code Misuse: Delhi HC Upholds ₹83 Lakh Penalty in Customs Duty Evasion [Read Order]
In a recent order, the Delhi High Court found that importers were aware of the Importer Exporter Code (IEC) misuse and upheld a penalty and customs duty demand of Rs. 83 lakh. The appeal was filed...
![Importer Aware of IEC Code Misuse: Delhi HC Upholds ₹83 Lakh Penalty in Customs Duty Evasion [Read Order]](https://www.taxscan.in/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Importer-Aware-IEC-Code-Misuse-Delhi-HC-Penalty-taxscan.webp "Importer Aware of IEC Code Misuse: Delhi HC Upholds ₹83 Lakh Penalty in Customs Duty Evasion [Read Order]")